Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 380

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 35 of the 35 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

UVB-Induced Tumor Heterogeneity Diminishes Immune Response in Melanoma

Open access
Wolf, Yochai, Bartok, Osnat, Patkar, Sushant, Eli, Gitit Bar, Cohen, Sapir, Litchfield, Kevin, Levy, Ronen, Jiménez-Sánchez, Alejandro, Trabish, Sophie, Lee, Joo Sang, Karathia, Hiren, Barnea, Eilon, Day, Chi-Ping, Cinnamon, Einat, Stein, Ilan, Solomon, Adam, Bitton, Lital, Pérez-Guijarro, Eva, Dubovik, Tania, Shen-Orr, Shai S., Miller, Martin L., Merlino, Glenn, Levin, Yishai, Pikarsky, Eli, Eisenbach, Lea, Admon, Arie, Swanton, Charles, Ruppin, Eytan, Samuels, Yardena·2019·Cell

Abstract

Although clonal neo-antigen burden is associated with improved response to immune therapy, the functional basis for this remains unclear. Here we study this question in a novel controlled mouse melanoma model that enables us to explore the effects of intra-tumor heterogeneity (ITH) on tumor aggressiveness and immunity independent of tumor mutational burden. Induction of UVB-derived mutations yields highly aggressive tumors with decreased anti-tumor activity. However, single-cell-derived tumors with reduced ITH are swiftly rejected. Their rejection is accompanied by increased T cell reactivity and a less suppressive microenvironment. Using phylogenetic analyses and mixing experiments of single-cell clones, we dissect two characteristics of ITH: the number of clones forming the tumor and their clonal diversity. Our analysis of melanoma patient tumor data recapitulates our results in terms of overall survival and response to immune checkpoint therapy. These findings highlight the importance of clonal mutations in robust immune surveillance and the need to quantify patient ITH to determine the response to checkpoint blockade.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.cell.2019.08.032

Cites

35 of 35 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 35 references

Cited by

See all 380

Metadata

Authors
Wolf, Y., Bartok, O., Patkar, S., Eli, G. B., Cohen, S., Litchfield, K., Levy, R., Jiménez-Sánchez, A., Trabish, S., Lee, J. S., Karathia, H., Barnea, E., Day, C.-P., Cinnamon, E., Stein, I., Solomon, A., Bitton, L., Pérez-Guijarro, E., Dubovik, T., Shen-Orr, S. S., Miller, M. L., Merlino, G., Levin, Y., Pikarsky, E., Eisenbach, L., Admon, A., Swanton, C., Ruppin, E., & Samuels, Y.
Venue
Cell
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2019-09
Volume
179
Issue
1
Pages
219-235.e21
ISSN
0092-8674 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2972939290
Cited by
380
References
35
FWCI
18.59
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
hybrid

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: UVB-Induced Tumor Heterogeneity Diminishes Immune Response in Melanoma. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.cell.2019.08.032
The paper
Wolf, Y., Bartok, O., Patkar, S., Eli, G. B., Cohen, S., Litchfield, K., Levy, R., Jiménez-Sánchez, A., Trabish, S., Lee, J. S., Karathia, H., Barnea, E., Day, C.-P., Cinnamon, E., Stein, I., Solomon, A., Bitton, L., Pérez-Guijarro, E., Dubovik, T., . . . Samuels, Y. (2019). UVB-Induced Tumor Heterogeneity Diminishes Immune Response in Melanoma. Cell. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2019.08.032

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.