Salmon provides fast and bias-aware quantification of transcript expression
Open accessPublished version of a preprint
Abstract
We introduce Salmon, a lightweight method for quantifying transcript abundance from RNA-seq reads. Salmon combines a new dual-phase parallel inference algorithm and feature-rich bias models with an ultra-fast read mapping procedure. It is the first transcriptome-wide quantifier to correct for fragment GC-content bias, which, as we demonstrate here, substantially improves the accuracy of abundance estimates and the sensitivity of subsequent differential expression analysis.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
0 of 26 cited sources checked · 0 supported · 0 flagged
- Findingnone given
Salmon attains the same order-of-magnitude speed gains as kallisto and Sailfish.
“simultaneously achieves the same order-of-magnitude speed benefits as kallisto and Sailfish”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Salmon's dual-phase inference and sample-specific bias models improve inter-replicate concordance relative to kallisto and eXpress.
“Salmon’s dual-phase inference algorithm and sample-specific bias models yield improved inter-replicate concordance (Supplementary Fig. 4) compared to both kallisto and eXpress.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- The authors state this as an assumption: For a given sequencing experiment, the true transcriptome and its transcript copy numbers are treated as fixed and known.
- The authors state this as an assumption: Without experimental bias, fragments are assumed to be sampled in proportion to transcript copy number times effective length.
- The authors state this as an assumption: All fragments are assumed to be generated independently.
- The authors state this as an assumption: The auxiliary model parameters are assumed not to depend on the current transcript abundance estimates.
- Rests on an assumption: Sequence-specific and fragment GC biases are assumed to have a conditional dependence.
- Findingown data
Salmon generally outperforms kallisto and eXpress in accuracy.
“We show that Salmon typically outperforms both kallisto and eXpress in terms of accuracy”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- The authors state this as an assumption: For a given sequencing experiment, the true transcriptome and its transcript copy numbers are treated as fixed and known.
- The authors state this as an assumption: Without experimental bias, fragments are assumed to be sampled in proportion to transcript copy number times effective length.
- The authors state this as an assumption: All fragments are assumed to be generated independently.
- The authors state this as an assumption: The auxiliary model parameters are assumed not to depend on the current transcript abundance estimates.
- Findingreasoning
Salmon is more accurate than kallisto and eXpress.
“Our novel quantification procedure, called Salmon, achieves greater accuracy than tools such as kallisto and eXpress”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- The authors state this as an assumption: For a given sequencing experiment, the true transcriptome and its transcript copy numbers are treated as fixed and known.
- The authors state this as an assumption: Without experimental bias, fragments are assumed to be sampled in proportion to transcript copy number times effective length.
- The authors state this as an assumption: All fragments are assumed to be generated independently.
- The authors state this as an assumption: The auxiliary model parameters are assumed not to depend on the current transcript abundance estimates.
- Findingown data
For differential expression testing, Salmon's quantification estimates give much higher sensitivity at the same false discovery rate, with sensitivity 53% to 250% higher.
“the quantification estimates produced by Salmon exhibit markedly higher sensitivity at the same false discovery rate (Table 1c) — achieving a sensitivity 53% to 250% higher, at the same FDRs.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- The authors state this as an assumption: For a given sequencing experiment, the true transcriptome and its transcript copy numbers are treated as fixed and known.
- The authors state this as an assumption: Without experimental bias, fragments are assumed to be sampled in proportion to transcript copy number times effective length.
- The authors state this as an assumption: All fragments are assumed to be generated independently.
- The authors state this as an assumption: The auxiliary model parameters are assumed not to depend on the current transcript abundance estimates.
- Findingown data
Permuting samples and performing within-center t-tests consistently produced much less than 1 differentially expressed transcript on average for all methods.
“This assumption was confirmed by permuting the samples and performing t-tests as well as making t-test comparisons of random subsets within sequencing center, which consistently produced ≪ 1 DE transcript on average for all methods.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
For most genes with four or more isoforms, nearly all expression was concentrated in the first three isoforms.
“The choice of distributing expression among three isoforms was motivated by exploratory data analysis of estimated transcript abundance revealing that for most genes nearly all of expression was concentrated in the first three isoforms for genes with four or more isoforms.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The model's performance seems robust to how many conditional GC models are used.
“The performance of the model appears robust to the number of conditional GC models used (Supplementary Fig. 7).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Sequence-specific and fragment GC biases are assumed to have a conditional dependence.
- Findingown data
In GEUVADIS experiments, dominant isoform switching seen between samples with kallisto or eXpress estimates disappears with Salmon's GC bias aware estimates.
“Supplementary Fig. 5 shows specific examples from the GEUVADIS experiments where dominant isoform switching is observed (p < 1 × 10−6) between samples under the quantification estimates produced by kallisto or eXpress, but this isoform switching is eliminated under the Salmon’s GC bias aware abundance estimates.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- The authors state this as an assumption: For a given sequencing experiment, the true transcriptome and its transcript copy numbers are treated as fixed and known.
- The authors state this as an assumption: Without experimental bias, fragments are assumed to be sampled in proportion to transcript copy number times effective length.
- The authors state this as an assumption: All fragments are assumed to be generated independently.
- The authors state this as an assumption: The auxiliary model parameters are assumed not to depend on the current transcript abundance estimates.
- Rests on an assumption: Sequence-specific and fragment GC biases are assumed to have a conditional dependence.
- Findingown data
Salmon lowers the isoform switching rate across various thresholds and gene categories.
“Supplementary Table 2 provides the rate of isoform switching for the different methods, underscoring that Salmon reduces this rate across various thresholds and for various categories of genes.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- The authors state this as an assumption: For a given sequencing experiment, the true transcriptome and its transcript copy numbers are treated as fixed and known.
- The authors state this as an assumption: Without experimental bias, fragments are assumed to be sampled in proportion to transcript copy number times effective length.
- The authors state this as an assumption: All fragments are assumed to be generated independently.
- The authors state this as an assumption: The auxiliary model parameters are assumed not to depend on the current transcript abundance estimates.
- Findingown data
Sampling the fragment length distribution usually gives large speed gains with only a modest loss in model fidelity.
“sampling the fragment length distribution tends to produce substantial speed improvements with only a very moderate effect on the model fidelity.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingreasoning
In idealized simulations such as RSEM-sim, where realistic biases are absent, different methods' accuracy estimates are more similar.
“In idealized simulations, like those generated by RSEM-sim, where realistic biases are not simulated, the accuracy estimates of different methods tend to be more similar”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- The authors state this as an assumption: For a given sequencing experiment, the true transcriptome and its transcript copy numbers are treated as fixed and known.
- The authors state this as an assumption: Without experimental bias, fragments are assumed to be sampled in proportion to transcript copy number times effective length.
- The authors state this as an assumption: All fragments are assumed to be generated independently.
- The authors state this as an assumption: The auxiliary model parameters are assumed not to depend on the current transcript abundance estimates.
- Findingnone given
Quasi-mapping is faster than traditional alignment.
“quasi-mapping is faster than traditional alignment.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Salmon makes fewer false-positive differential expression calls in comparisons expected to have few or no true transcript expression differences.
“Likewise, Salmon produces fewer false-positive differential expression calls in comparisons that are expected to contain few or no true differences in transcript expression (Table 1d).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- The authors state this as an assumption: For a given sequencing experiment, the true transcriptome and its transcript copy numbers are treated as fixed and known.
- The authors state this as an assumption: Without experimental bias, fragments are assumed to be sampled in proportion to transcript copy number times effective length.
- The authors state this as an assumption: All fragments are assumed to be generated independently.
- The authors state this as an assumption: The auxiliary model parameters are assumed not to depend on the current transcript abundance estimates.
- Findingown data
Using Salmon estimates for gene-level differential expression analysis reduces the number of genes called DE by about 2.6-fold.
“where the use of Salmon’s estimates for gene-level DE analysis leads to a decrease by a factor of ~2.6 in the number of genes that are called as DE (Supplementary Table 1).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- The authors state this as an assumption: For a given sequencing experiment, the true transcriptome and its transcript copy numbers are treated as fixed and known.
- The authors state this as an assumption: Without experimental bias, fragments are assumed to be sampled in proportion to transcript copy number times effective length.
- The authors state this as an assumption: All fragments are assumed to be generated independently.
- The authors state this as an assumption: The auxiliary model parameters are assumed not to depend on the current transcript abundance estimates.
- Findingown data
The extra computational cost of applying bias correction is usually small.
“Typically, the extra computational cost required to apply bias correction is rather small”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
Salmon's two-phase inference lets it construct a probabilistic model of the sequencing experiment that includes information not used by Sailfish and kallisto.
“This two-phase inference procedure allows Salmon to build a probabilistic model of the sequencing experiment that incorporates information — like terms contributing to the conditional probability of drawing a fragment given a transcript — not considered by Sailfish [9] and kallisto [10].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked - Premisecitation
Existing transcriptome-wide abundance estimators, whether alignment-based or alignment-free, do not have sample-specific bias models detailed enough to capture major effects such as fragment GC content bias.
“However, existing methods for transcriptome-wide abundance estimation, both alignment-based and alignment-free, lack sample-specific bias models rich enough to capture important effects, like fragment GC content bias.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [5] Love, M.I., Hogenesch, J.B. & Irizarry, R.A. Nat. Biotechnol. 34, 1287–1291 (2016). source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
If not corrected, these biases can cause high false positive rates in differential expression studies.
“When uncorrected, these biases can lead to, e.g., high false positive rates in differential expression studies [5].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [5] Love, M.I., Hogenesch, J.B. & Irizarry, R.A. Nat. Biotechnol. 34, 1287–1291 (2016). source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
The concurrent cuckoo hash map allows many threads to simultaneously query and write to the map with very little contention.
“The efficient, concurrent nature of the data structure means that many threads can simultaneously query and write to the map while encountering very little contention.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [28] Li, X., David, G., Andersen, M.K. & Freedman, M.J. in Proc. Ninth Eur. Conf. Computer Syst. 27 (ACM, 2014).
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Asynchronous updates with little synchronization have little-to-no detrimental effect on estimation due to the stochastic and additive nature of the updates.
“However, due to the stochastic and additive nature of the updates, this has little-to-no detrimental effect [24].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [24] Hsieh, C.-J., Yu, H.-F. & Dhillon, I.S. ICML 15, 2370–2379 (2015).
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationcitation
Sparse updates, where only transcripts appearing in a mini-batch are updated, allow efficient updates to the α parameters.
“These updates are sparse; i.e., only transcripts that appeared in some alignment in mini-batch Bτ will have their global weight updated after Bτ has been processed. This ensures, as in [15], that updates to the parameters α can be performed efficiently.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [15] Roberts, A. & Pachter, L. Nat. Methods 10, 71–73 (2013). source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
The sequence around the 5' and 3' ends of RNA-seq fragments affects how likely those fragments are to be selected for sequencing.
“It has been previously observed that the sequence surrounding the 5′ and 3′ ends of RNA-seq fragments influences the likelihood that these fragments are selected for sequencing [4].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [4] Roberts, A., Trapnell, C., Donaghey, J., Rinn, J.L. & Pachter, L. Genome Biol. 12, R22 (2011). source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Collapsing fragments into equivalence classes greatly reduces the time required for iterative optimization in transcript quantification.
“Collapsing fragments into equivalence classes is a well-established idea in the transcript quantification literature, and numerous different notions of equivalence classes have been previously introduced, and shown to greatly reduce the time required to perform iterative optimization such as that described in Offline phase.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites [25] Salzman, J., Jiang, H. & Wong, W.H. Stat. Sci. 26, 1 (2011). source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [26] Nicolae, M., Mangul, S., Maă ndoiu, I.I. & Zelikovsky, A. Algorithms Mol. Biol. 6, 9 (2011). source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [27] Turro, E. et al. Genome Biol. 12, R13 (2011). source
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationreasoning
Results from SEQC, GEUVADIS, and Polyester (simulated with bias) are expected to better represent typical real-world performance.
“However, we expect results on the SEQC [12], GEUVADIS [11], and Polyester [13] (simulated with bias) data sets to be more representative of typical real-world performance.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites [12] SEQC/MAQ-III Consortium. Nat. Biotechnol. 32, 903–914 (2014).
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [11] Lappalainen, T. et al. Nature 501, 506–511 (2013). source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [13] Frazee, A.C., Jaffe, A.E., Langmead, B. & Leek, J.T. Bioinformatics 31, 2778–2784 (2015). source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
The GC content of an entire fragment can strongly affect its likelihood of being selected for sequencing.
“it has also been observed that the GC-content of the entire fragment can play a substantial role in the likelihood that it will be selected for sequencing [5].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [5] Love, M.I., Hogenesch, J.B. & Irizarry, R.A. Nat. Biotechnol. 34, 1287–1291 (2016). source
Not checked in the free run.
- May combine two claims. 14
- Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 15
May combine two claims.
Findingown dataSalmon provides accurate and fast quantification of transcript abundance from RNA-seq reads.
“We introduce Salmon, a method for quantifying transcript abundance from RNA-seq reads that is accurate and fast.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- The authors state this as an assumption: For a given sequencing experiment, the true transcriptome and its transcript copy numbers are treated as fixed and known.
- The authors state this as an assumption: Without experimental bias, fragments are assumed to be sampled in proportion to transcript copy number times effective length.
- The authors state this as an assumption: All fragments are assumed to be generated independently.
- The authors state this as an assumption: The auxiliary model parameters are assumed not to depend on the current transcript abundance estimates.
May combine two claims.
Findingown dataCorrecting fragment GC content bias markedly improves abundance estimate accuracy and the reliability of downstream differential expression analysis.
“which we demonstrate substantially improves the accuracy of abundance estimates and the reliability of subsequent differential expression analysis”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- The authors state this as an assumption: For a given sequencing experiment, the true transcriptome and its transcript copy numbers are treated as fixed and known.
- The authors state this as an assumption: Without experimental bias, fragments are assumed to be sampled in proportion to transcript copy number times effective length.
- The authors state this as an assumption: All fragments are assumed to be generated independently.
- The authors state this as an assumption: The auxiliary model parameters are assumed not to depend on the current transcript abundance estimates.
- Rests on an assumption: Sequence-specific and fragment GC biases are assumed to have a conditional dependence.
May combine two claims.
Findingown dataSetting --biasSpeedSamp to 5 cuts additional bias correction time on sample ERR188021 from 119 to 20 seconds, with only a slight rise in false positive calls on GEUVADIS data.
“setting --biasSpeedSamp to 5 reduces the additional bias correction time on sample ERR188021 mentioned above from 119 to 20 seconds, yet it leads to only a marginal increase in the number of false positive calls on the GEUVADIS data”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataSalmon is built to use multiple CPU cores, and its mapping and inference procedures scale well with read count.
“Salmon is designed take advantage of multiple CPU cores, and the mapping and inference procedures scale well with the number of reads in an experiment.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataSalmon can quantify about 600 million 75bp paired-end reads in roughly 23 minutes with 30 threads, close to kallisto's roughly 20 minutes for the same task.
“Salmon can quantify an experiment of approximately 600 million reads (75bp, paired-end) in ≈ 23 minutes (1384 seconds) using 30 threads— this roughly matches the speed of the recently-introduced kallisto, which takes ≈ 20 minutes (1198 seconds) to complete the same task using the same number of threads on the same machine”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe first 8 GEUVADIS samples exhibited weak GC content dependence while the last 8 samples exhibited more severe fragment-level GC bias.
“The first 8 GEUVADIS samples exhibited weak GC content dependence while the last 8 samples exhibited more severe fragment-level GC bias.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationnone givenNo earlier transcriptome-wide quantification tool corrected for fragment GC content bias; Salmon does.
“Salmon is the first transcriptome-wide quantifier to correct for fragment GC content bias”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationThe setup for continuous accuracy tracking overlaps considerably with the setup suggested for continuous analysis by Beaulieu-Jones and Greene.
“We note that this setup overlaps considerably with the setup suggested for “continuous analysis” by Beaulieu-Jones and Greene [32].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [32] Brett, K.B.-J. & Greene, C.S. Preprint at https://doi.org/10.1101/056473 (2016). source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationWith enough training data, one can learn a separate bin for each read position.
“given sufficient training data, it is even possible to learn a separate bin for each position of a read [15].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [15] Roberts, A. & Pachter, L. Nat. Methods 10, 71–73 (2013). source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationThe bootstrap sampling process is inspired by kallisto.
“Additionally, inspired by kallisto [10], Salmon also provides the ability to draw bootstrap samples, which is an alternative way to assign confidence to the estimates returned by the main inference algorithm.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [10] Bray, N.L., Pimentel, H., Melsted, P. & Pachter, L. Nat. Biotechnol. 34, 525–527 (2016). source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductreasoningLack of synchronization in the online phase means the most up-to-date values of α may not be used when estimating xy.
“This lack of synchronization means that when estimating xy, we cannot be certain that the most up-to-date values of α are being used.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationEven a single spatially homogeneous error profile seems to perform reasonably well.
“even a single, spatially homogeneous error profile appears to work reasonably well [22]”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [22] Nariai, N. et al. BMC Genomics 15 (Suppl. 10), S5 (2014). source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).
Interpretationnone givenSalmon's approach is unique in combining experimental data and bias models with an efficient dual-phase inference procedure.
“Salmon’s approach is unique in how it combines models of experimental data and bias with an efficient dual-phase inference procedure.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationPolyester allows simulating experiments with differential transcript expression and biological variability, enabling assessment of accuracy and downstream differential expression performance.
“In addition to the ability to generate reads, Polyester allows simulating experiments with differential transcript expression and biological variability. Thus, we can assess not only the accuracy of the resulting estimates, but also how these estimates would perform in a typical downstream analysis task like differential expression testing.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [13] Frazee, A.C., Jaffe, A.E., Langmead, B. & Leek, J.T. Bioinformatics 31, 2778–2784 (2015). source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningVery small non-zero expression values may negatively affect the MARD metric, so truncating TPMs below 0.01 before computing MARD mitigates this.
“However, eXpress does not perform such a truncation, and very small, non-zero values may have a negative effect on the MARD metric. To mitigate such effects, we first truncate to 0 all TPMs less than 0.01 before computing the MARDs.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationThe SCVB0 inference algorithm is essentially equivalent to variants of the online-EM algorithm with a modified prior.
“As outlined in [19], the SCVB0 inference algorithm is essentially equivalent to variants of the online-EM [23] algorithm with a modified prior.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [19] Foulds, J., Boyles, L., DuBois, C., Smyth, P. & Welling, M. in Proc. 19th ACM SIGKDD Int. Conf. Knowledge Discov. & Data Mining 446–454 (ACM, 2013). source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [23] Cappé, O. in Mixtures: Estimation and Applications (eds. Mengersen, K.L., Robert, C.P. & Titterington, D.M.) Ch. 2 (John Wiley & Sons, 2011).
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Premisenone givenSalmon and kallisto truncate very tiny expression values to 0 by default, while eXpress does not.
“We note that Salmon and kallisto, by default, truncate very tiny expression values to 0. For example, any transcript estimated to produce < 1 × 10−8 reads is assigned an estimated read count of 0 (which, likewise, affects the TPM estimates). However, eXpress does not perform such a truncation”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Study design and conductreasoningA parallel self-hosted continuous integration system runs Salmon on simulated samples on each commit, stores accuracy metrics, and allows tracking accuracy and identifying performance regressions across commits.
“For this task, a parallel, self-hosted continuous integration system has been created. On each commit to the Salmon repository, a Drone (Drone-CI) server pulls the latest commit, and builds it in a clean CentOS5 environment using Docker [30]. In addition to the functionality tests, Salmon is run on simulated samples (generated using Polyester [13]).”
- Also stated in: § Validation · plain
“This allows us to track accuracy over various Salmon commits, and to identify the commit corresponding to any performance regressions.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites [30] Merkel, D. Linux J. 2014 (2014).
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [13] Frazee, A.C., Jaffe, A.E., Langmead, B. & Leek, J.T. Bioinformatics 31, 2778–2784 (2015). source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [31] Di Tommaso, P., Chatzou, M., Baraja, P.P. & Notredame, C. figshare https://dx.doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.1254958.v2 (2014). source
Not checked in the free run.
- Also stated in: § Validation · plain
May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningThe likelihood over rich equivalence classes with aggregate weights is not exactly equivalent to the full fragment likelihood, but the weights allow consideration of conditional probabilities without continuously reconsidering each fragment.
“Though the likelihood function over equivalence classes that considers these weights (Equation (10)) is no longer exactly equivalent to the likelihood defined over all fragments (Equation (9)), these weights nonetheless allow us to take into consideration the conditional probabilities specified in the full model, without having to continuously reconsider each of the fragments in ℱ.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningBecause the bias model evaluates bias along reference transcriptome bases, its cost scales with the number of expressed transcripts rather than reads, making the extra cost nearly independent of fragment count.
“since the bias model works by evaluating the bias along bases of the reference transcriptome, it scales in the number of active (i.e., expressed) transcripts rather than in the number of reads, so the extra cost of bias modeling is almost entirely independent of the number of fragments in an experiment.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationThe Gibbs sampling procedure for posterior sampling adopts the model of Turro et al.
“To perform this Gibbs sampling, we adopt the model of Turro et al. [27] (details in Supplementary Note 2).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [27] Turro, E. et al. Genome Biol. 12, R13 (2011). source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisenone givenThe inference procedure is generic over the type of alignments being processed, accepting either regular alignments or quasi-mappings.
“The inference procedure itself is generic over the type of alignments being processed; they may be either regular alignments (e.g. coming from a bam file), or quasi-mappings computed from the raw reads (e.g. coming from FASTA/Q files).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Study design and conductreasoningTesting during Salmon development is highly automated, with continuous integration that builds each commit and runs functionality tests, but these tests do not assess quantification accuracy.
“Testing during the Salmon development and release process is highly-automated.”
- Also stated in: § Validation · plain
“A publicly-facing continuous integration service (Travis-CI) automatically builds each commit, and runs a small set of functionality tests to ensure that no breaking changes have been committed. However, these tests do not assess or track quantification accuracy.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Also stated in: § Validation · plain
The authors state this as an assumption.
For a given sequencing experiment, the true transcriptome and its transcript copy numbers are treated as fixed and known.
“Assume that, for a particular sequencing experiment, the underlying true transcriptome is given as 𝒥 = {(t1, … , tM), (c1, … , cM)}, where each ti is the nucleotide sequence of some transcript (an isoform of some gene) and each ci is the corresponding number of copies of t in the sample.”
The authors state this as an assumption.
Without experimental bias, fragments are assumed to be sampled in proportion to transcript copy number times effective length.
“We adopt a generative model of the sequencing experiment that dictates that, in the absence of experimental bias, library fragments are sampled proportional to ci · ℓ̃ι.”
The authors state this as an assumption.
All fragments are assumed to be generated independently.
“if we assume that all fragments are generated independently”
The authors state this as an assumption.
The auxiliary model parameters are assumed not to depend on the current transcript abundance estimates.
“This probability, in turn, depends on auxiliary models whose parameters do not explicitly depend upon the current estimates of transcript abundances.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Sequence-specific and fragment GC biases are assumed to have a conditional dependence.
“Additionally, we note that sequence-specific and fragment GC biases do seem to display a conditional dependence.”
The authors state this as an assumption.
Samples from the same human population are expected to have few to no true differences in transcript abundance.
“Because the samples are from the same human population, it is expected that there would be few to no true differences in transcript abundance produced by this comparison.”
The paper relies on this without support.
RSEM estimates on sample NA12716_7 represent true expression.
“RSEM was run on sample NA12716_7 from the GEUVADIS RNA-seq data to learn model parameters and estimate true expression, and the learned model was then used to generate 20 different simulated datasets”
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
PSAP variants are associated with lysosomal storage disorders and Parkinson's Disease.
“Given the screen phenotypes of PSAP, which were unexpected based on its known functions, and the association of PSAP variants not only with lysosomal storage disorders60–62 but also Parkinson’s Disease63, we decided to further investigate the underlying mechanisms of PSAP in neuronal redox regulation.”
From Genome-wide CRISPRi/a screens in human neurons link lysosomal failure to ferroptosis (2021) · cites this paper as [61]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.
Fragment-origin probability is also defined as zero
MinorThe text identifies this conditional probability as the chance of generating a fragment from its source transcript, then says the same probability is uniformly zero. If it were zero for every fragment, the stated likelihood model could not assign positive probability to any observation.
“We will use Pr{fj | ti} as shorthand for Pr{fj | ti, zij = 1} since Pr{fj | ti, zij = 1} is defined to be uniformly 0.”
“We have that Pr{fj | ti, zij = 1} is the probability of generating fragment j given that it came from transcript i.”
Cites
Fast gapped-read alignment with Bowtie 2
Langmead, B., & Salzberg, S. L. (2012) · Nature Methods · doi:10.1038/nmeth.1923 · Cited by 56,400 · see citing works
Near-optimal probabilistic RNA-seq quantification
Bray, N. L., Pimentel, H., Melsted, P., & Pachter, L. (2016) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/nbt.3519 · Cited by 9,723 · see citing works
The cancer genome atlas pan-cancer analysis project
The Cancer Genome Atlas Research Network, Weinstein, J. N., Collisson, E. A., Mills, G. B., Shaw, K. R. M., Ozenberger, B. A., Ellrott, K., Shmulevich, I., Sander, C., & Stuart, J. M. (2013) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/ng.2764 · Cited by 9,092 · see citing works
Ancient DNA and the rewriting of human history: be sparing with Occam’s razor
Haber, M., Mezzavilla, M., Xue, Y., & Tyler-Smith, C. (2016) · Genome Biology · doi:10.1186/s13059-015-0866-z · Cited by 1,924 · see citing works
Transcriptome and genome sequencing uncovers functional variation in humans
The Geuvadis Consortium, Lappalainen, T., Sammeth, M., Friedländer, M. R., ‘t Hoen, P. A. C., Monlong, J., Rivas, M. A., Gonzàlez-Porta, M., Kurbatova, N., Griebel, T., et al. (2013) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature12531 · Cited by 1,888 · see citing works
Improving RNA-Seq expression estimates by correcting for fragment bias
Roberts, A., Trapnell, C., Donaghey, J., Rinn, J. L., & Pachter, L. (2011) · Genome Biology · doi:10.1186/gb-2011-12-3-r22 · Cited by 1,725 · see citing works
Hoadley, K. A., Yau, C. S. F., Wolf, D. M., Cherniack, A. D., Tamborero, D., Ng, S., Leiserson, M. D. M., Niu, B., McLellan, M. D., Uzunangelov, V., et al. (2014) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2014.06.049 · Cited by 1,500 · see citing works
RNA-Seq gene expression estimation with read mapping uncertainty
Li, B., Ruotti, V., Stewart, R. M., Thomson, J. A., & Dewey, C. N. (2010) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btp692 · Cited by 1,198 · see citing works
Streaming fragment assignment for real-time analysis of sequencing experiments
Roberts, A., & Pachter, L. (2013) · Nature Methods · doi:10.1038/nmeth.2251 · Cited by 1,063 · see citing works
SEQC/MAQC-III Consortium (2014) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/nbt.2957 · Cited by 983 · cited 5× · see citing works
“SEQC/MAQ-III Consortium et al. A comprehensive assessment of RNA-seq accuracy, reproducibility and information content by the Sequencing Quality Control Consortium.”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialThe sequence read archive: explosive growth of sequencing data
Kodama, Y., Shumway, M., Leinonen, R., & on behalf of the International Nucleotide Sequence Database Collaboration (2012) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkr854 · Cited by 894 · see citing works
Patro, R., Mount, S. M., & Kingsford, C. (2014) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/nbt.2862 · Cited by 586 · see citing works
Self-citationMorán, I., Akerman, I., van de Bunt, M., Xie, R., Benazra, M., Nammo, T., Arnes, L., Nakić, N., García-Hurtado, J., Rodríguez-Seguí, S., et al. (2012) · Cell Metabolism · doi:10.1016/j.cmet.2012.08.010 · Cited by 422 · see citing works
<i>Polyester</i> : simulating RNA-seq datasets with differential transcript expression
Frazee, A. C., Jaffe, A. E., Langmead, B., & Leek, J. T. (2015) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btv272 · Cited by 313 · see citing works
Haplotype and isoform specific expression estimation using multi-mapping RNA-seq reads
Turro, E., Su, S.-Y., Gonçalves, Â., Coin, L. J., Richardson, S., & Lewin, A. (2011) · Genome Biology · doi:10.1186/gb-2011-12-2-r13 · Cited by 264 · see citing works
Reproducibility of high-throughput mRNA and small RNA sequencing across laboratories
The GEUVADIS Consortium, 't Hoen, P. A. C., Friedländer, M. R., Almlöf, J., Sammeth, M., Pulyakhina, I., Anvar, S. Y., Laros, J. F. J., Buermans, H. P. J., Karlberg, O., et al. (2013) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/nbt.2702 · Cited by 250 · see citing works
A benchmark for RNA-seq quantification pipelines
Teng, M., Love, M. I., Davis, C., Djebali, S., Dobin, A., Graveley, B. R., Li, S., Mason, C. E., Olson, S., Pervouchine, D. D., et al. (2016) · Genome biology · doi:10.1186/s13059-016-0940-1 · Cited by 189 · see citing works
Self-citationLove, M. I., Hogenesch, J. B., & Irizarry, R. A. (2016) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/nbt.3682 · Cited by 186 · see citing works
Self-citationAlgorithmic improvements for fast concurrent Cuckoo hashing
Li, X., Andersen, D. G., Kaminsky, M., et al. (2014) · European Conference on Computer Systems · doi:10.1145/2592798.2592820 · Cited by 185 · see citing works
Estimation of alternative splicing isoform frequencies from RNA-Seq data
Nicolae, M., Mangul, S., Măndoiu, I. I., & Zelikovsky, A. (2011) · Algorithms for Molecular Biology · doi:10.1186/1748-7188-6-9 · Cited by 178 · see citing works
Reproducible Computational Workflows with Continuous Analysis
Beaulieu-Jones, B. K., & Greene, C. S. (2016) · doi:10.1101/056473 · Cited by 154 · see citing works
Reproducibility of computational workflows is automated using continuous analysis
Beaulieu‐Jones, B. K., & Greene, C. S. (2017) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/nbt.3780 · Cited by 151 · see citing works
Stochastic collapsed variational Bayesian inference for latent Dirichlet allocation
Foulds, J., Boyles, L., DuBois, C., Smyth, P., & Welling, M. (2013) · Proceedings of the 19th ACM SIGKDD international conference on Knowledge discovery and data mining · doi:10.1145/2487575.2487697 · Cited by 126 · see citing works
Statistical Inference: The Big Picture
Kass, R. E. (2011) · Statistical Science · doi:10.1214/10-sts337 · Cited by 114 · see citing works
RapMap: a rapid, sensitive and accurate tool for mapping RNA-seq reads to transcriptomes
Srivastava, A., Sarkar, H., Gupta, N., & Patro, R. (2016) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btw277 · Cited by 106 · see citing works
Self-citationLi, J. J., Huang, H., Bickel, P. J., & Brenner, S. E. (2014) · Genome Research · doi:10.1101/gr.170100.113 · Cited by 95 · see citing works
Statistical Modeling of RNA-Seq Data
Salzman, J., Jiang, H., & Wong, W. H. (2011) · Statistical Science · doi:10.1214/10-sts343 · Cited by 68 · see citing works
Statistical modeling of RNA-Seq data
Salzman, J., Jiang, H., & Wong, W. H. (2011) · Cited by 62 · see citing works
TIGAR2: sensitive and accurate estimation of transcript isoform expression with longer RNA-Seq reads
Nariai, N., Kojima, K., Mimori, T., Sato, Y., Kawai, Y., Yamaguchi-Kabata, Y., & Nagasaki, M. (2014) · BMC Genomics · doi:10.1186/1471-2164-15-s10-s5 · Cited by 51 · see citing works
PASSCoDe: Parallel ASynchronous Stochastic dual Co-ordinate DescentPreprint
Hsieh, C., Yu, H., & Dhillon, I. S. (2015) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1504.01365 · Cited by 39 · see citing works
Online Expectation Maximisation
Cappé, O. (2011) · Wiley series in probability and statistics · doi:10.1002/9781119995678.ch2 · Cited by 35 · see citing works
Fast and accurate approximate inference of transcript expression from RNA-seq data
Hensman, J. J., Papastamoulis, P., Glaus, P., Honkela, A., & Rattray, M. (2015) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btv483 · Cited by 32 · see citing works
Efficient and scalable scaffolding using optical restriction maps
Saha, S., & Rajasekaran, S. (2014) · BMC Genomics · doi:10.1186/1471-2164-15-s5-s5 · Cited by 24 · see citing works
Linuxbrew and Homebrew for cross-platform package management
Jackman, S. D., & Birol, İ. (2016) · doi:10.7490/f1000research.1112681.1 · Cited by 15 · see citing works
A novel tool for highly scalable computational pipelines
Tommaso, P. D., Chatzou, M., Baraja, P. P., & Notredame, C. (2014) · figshare · doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.1254958.v2 · Cited by 13 · cited 1× · see citing works
“These test (automated using Next Flow [31]), build the Salmon index, quantify all of the simulated samples, and store the resulting accuracy metrics in a JSON formatted file.”
MethodA novel tool for highly scalable computational pipelines
Di Tommaso, P., Chatzou, M., Prieto Baraja, P., et al. (2014) · Figshare · doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.1254958 · Cited by 12 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 5
- Bishop, C.M. et al. Pattern Recognition and Machine Learning (Springer, 2006).
- Cappé, O. in Mixtures: Estimation and Applications (eds. Mengersen, K.L., Robert, C.P. & Titterington, D.M.) Ch. 2 (John Wiley & Sons, 2011).
- Hsieh, C.-J., Yu, H.-F. & Dhillon, I.S. ICML 15, 2370–2379 (2015).
- Li, X., David, G., Andersen, M.K. & Freedman, M.J. in Proc. Ninth Eur. Conf. Computer Syst. 27 (ACM, 2014).
- Jackman, S. & Birol, I. F1000Research 5, 1795 (2016).
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The Galaxy platform for accessible, reproducible and collaborative biomedical analyses: 2018 update
Afgan, E., Baker, D., Batut, B., van den Beek, M., Bouvier, D., Čech, M., Chilton, J., Clements, D., Coraor, N., Grüning, B. A., et al. (2018) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gky379 · Cited by 3,662 · see citing works
The complete sequence of a human genome
Nurk, S., Koren, S., Rhie, A., Rautiainen, M., Bzikadze, A. V., Mikheenko, A., Vollger, M. R., Altemose, N., Uralsky, L., Gershman, A., et al. (2022) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.abj6987 · Cited by 3,136 · see citing works
Slide-seq: A scalable technology for measuring genome-wide expression at high spatial resolution
Rodriques, S. G., Stickels, R. R., Goeva, A., Martin, C. A., Murray, E., Vanderburg, C. R., Welch, J., Chen, L. M., Chen, F., & Macosko, E. Z. (2019) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aaw1219 · Cited by 2,424 · see citing works
MetaWRAP—a flexible pipeline for genome-resolved metagenomic data analysis
Uritskiy, G. V., DiRuggiero, J., & Taylor, J. (2018) · Microbiome · doi:10.1186/s40168-018-0541-1 · Cited by 2,642 · see citing works
Opportunities and challenges in long-read sequencing data analysis
Amarasinghe, S. L., Su, S., Dong, X., Zappia, L., Ritchie, M. E., & Gouil, Q. (2020) · Genome Biology · doi:10.1186/s13059-020-1935-5 · Cited by 2,530 · see citing works
Single-cell transcriptional diversity is a hallmark of developmental potential
Gulati, G. S., Sikandar, S. S., Wesche, D. J., Manjunath, A., Bharadwaj, A., Berger, M. J., Ilagan, F., Kuo, A. H., Hsieh, R. W., Cai, S., et al. (2020) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aax0249 · Cited by 1,571 · see citing works
Functional aspects of meningeal lymphatics in ageing and Alzheimer’s disease
Da Mesquita, S., Louveau, A., Vaccari, A., Smirnov, I., Cornelison, R. C., Kingsmore, K. M., Contarino, C., Onengut-Gumuscu, S., Farber, E., Raper, D., et al. (2018) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-018-0368-8 · Cited by 1,445 · see citing works
A large-scale binding and functional map of human RNA-binding proteins
Van Nostrand, E. L., Freese, P., Pratt, G. A., Wang, X., Wei, X., Xiao, R., Blue, S. M., Chen, J.-Y., Cody, N. A. L., Dominguez, D., et al. (2020) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-020-2077-3 · Cited by 1,317 · see citing works
Next-Generation Sequencing Technology: Current Trends and Advancements
Satam, H., Joshi, K., Mangrolia, U., Waghoo, S., Zaidi, G., Rawool, S., Thakare, R. P., Banday, S., Mishra, A. K., Das, G., et al. (2023) · Biology · doi:10.3390/biology12070997 · Cited by 1,299 · see citing works
A draft human pangenome reference.
Liao, W.-W., Asri, M., Ebler, J., Doerr, D., Haukness, M., Hickey, G., Lu, S., Lucas, J. K., Monlong, J., Abel, H. J., et al. (2023) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-023-05896-x · Cited by 1,129 · see citing works
Orchestrating single-cell analysis with Bioconductor
Amezquita, R. A., Lun, A. T. L., Becht, E., Carey, V. J., Carpp, L. N., Geistlinger, L., Marini, F., Rue-Albrecht, K., Risso, D., Soneson, C., et al. (2020) · Nature Methods · doi:10.1038/s41592-019-0654-x · Cited by 945 · see citing works
Splatter: simulation of single-cell RNA sequencing data
Zappia, L., Phipson, B., & Oshlack, A. (2017) · Genome Biology · doi:10.1186/s13059-017-1305-0 · Cited by 905 · see citing works
Bias, robustness and scalability in single-cell differential expression analysis
Soneson, C., & Robinson, M. D. (2018) · Nature Methods · doi:10.1038/nmeth.4612 · Cited by 770 · see citing works
Lung adenocarcinoma promotion by air pollutants
Hill, W., Lim, E. L., Weeden, C. E., Lee, C., Augustine, M., Chen, K., Kuan, F.-C., Marongiu, F., Evans, E. J., Moore, D. A., et al. (2023) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-023-05874-3 · Cited by 808 · see citing works
Single-cell RNA counting at allele and isoform resolution using Smart-seq3
Hagemann-Jensen, M., Ziegenhain, C., Chen, P., Ramsköld, D., Hendriks, G.-J., Larsson, A. J. M., Faridani, O. R., & Sandberg, R. (2020) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/s41587-020-0497-0 · Cited by 700 · see citing works
Decoding myofibroblast origins in human kidney fibrosis
Kuppe, C., Ibrahim, M. M., Kranz, J., Zhang, X., Ziegler, S., Perales-Patón, J., Jansen, J., Reimer, K. C., Smith, J. R., Dobie, R., et al. (2021) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-020-2941-1 · Cited by 769 · see citing works
High-dimensional single-cell analysis predicts response to anti-PD-1 immunotherapy
Krieg, C., Nowicka, M., Guglietta, S., Schindler, S., Hartmann, F. J., Weber, L. M., Dummer, R., Robinson, M. D., Levesque, M. P., & Becher, B. (2018) · Nature Medicine · doi:10.1038/nm.4466 · Cited by 735 · see citing works
Mitochondrial stress is relayed to the cytosol by an OMA1–DELE1–HRI pathway
Guo, X., Aviles, G., Liu, Y., Tian, R., Unger, B. A., Lin, Y.-H. T., Wiita, A. P., Xu, K., Correia, M. A., & Kampmann, M. (2020) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-020-2078-2 · Cited by 674 · see citing works
Complete genomic and epigenetic maps of human centromeres
Altemose, N., Logsdon, G. A., Bzikadze, A. V., Sidhwani, P., Langley, S. A., Caldas, G. V., Hoyt, S. J., Uralsky, L., Ryabov, F. D., Shew, C. J., et al. (2022) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.abl4178 · Cited by 618 · see citing works
Rodig, S. J., Gusenleitner, D., Jackson, D. G., Gjini, E., Giobbie-Hurder, A., Jin, C., Chang, H., Lovitch, S. B., Horak, C., Weber, J. S., et al. (2018) · Science Translational Medicine · doi:10.1126/scitranslmed.aar3342 · Cited by 579 · see citing works
Human gut bacteria produce ΤΗ17-modulating bile acid metabolites
Paik, D., Yao, L., Zhang, Y., Bae, S., D’Agostino, G. D., Zhang, M., Kim, E., Franzosa, E. A., Avila-Pacheco, J., Bisanz, J. E., et al. (2022) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-022-04480-z · Cited by 594 · see citing works
Human ADAR1 Prevents Endogenous RNA from Triggering Translational Shutdown
Chung, H., Calis, J. J. A., Wu, X., Sun, T., Yu, Y., Sarbanes, S. L., Dao Thi, V. L., Shilvock, A. R., Hoffmann, H.-H., Rosenberg, B. R., et al. (2018) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2017.12.038 · Cited by 538 · see citing works
A test metric for assessing single-cell RNA-seq batch correction
Büttner, M., Miao, Z., Wolf, F. A., Teichmann, S. A., & Theis, F. J. (2019) · Nature Methods · doi:10.1038/s41592-018-0254-1 · Cited by 511 · see citing works
Power analysis of single-cell RNA-sequencing experiments
Svensson, V., Natarajan, K. N., Ly, L.-H., Miragaia, R. J., Labalette, C., Macaulay, I. C., Cvejic, A., & Teichmann, S. A. (2017) · Nature Methods · doi:10.1038/nmeth.4220 · Cited by 568 · see citing works
Single-Cell Transcriptomics of Regulatory T Cells Reveals Trajectories of Tissue Adaptation
Miragaia, R. J., Gomes, T., Chomka, A., Jardine, L., Riedel, A., Hegazy, A. N., Whibley, N., Tucci, A., Chen, X., Lindeman, I., et al. (2019) · Immunity · doi:10.1016/j.immuni.2019.01.001 · Cited by 499 · see citing works
A gut-derived metabolite alters brain activity and anxiety behaviour in mice
Needham, B. D., Funabashi, M., Adame, M. D., Wang, Z., Boktor, J. C., Haney, J., Wu, W.-L., Rabut, C., Ladinsky, M. S., Hwang, S.-J., et al. (2022) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-022-04396-8 · Cited by 489 · see citing works
Meningeal lymphatics affect microglia responses and anti-Aβ immunotherapy
Da Mesquita, S., Papadopoulos, Z., Dykstra, T., Brase, L., Farias, F. G., Wall, M., Jiang, H., Kodira, C. D., de Lima, K. A., Herz, J., et al. (2021) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-021-03489-0 · Cited by 431 · see citing works
Single-nucleus profiling of human dilated and hypertrophic cardiomyopathy
Chaffin, M., Papangeli, I., Simonson, B., Akkad, A.-D., Hill, M. C., Arduini, A., Fleming, S. J., Melanson, M., Hayat, S., Kost-Alimova, M., et al. (2022) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-022-04817-8 · Cited by 418 · see citing works
Genome-wide CRISPRi/a screens in human neurons link lysosomal failure to ferroptosis
Tian, R., Abarientos, A., Hong, J., Hashemi, S. H., Yan, R., Dräger, N., Leng, K., Nalls, M. A., Singleton, A. B., Xu, K., et al. (2021) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/s41593-021-00862-0 · Cited by 414 · see citing works
Resurrection of endogenous retroviruses during aging reinforces senescence
Liu, X., Liu, Z., Wu, Z., Ren, J., Fan, Y., Sun, L., Cao, G., Niu, Y., Zhang, B., Ji, Q., et al. (2023) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2022.12.017 · Cited by 390 · see citing works
Mills, R. H., Dulai, P. S., Vázquez-Baeza, Y., Sauceda, C., Daniel, N., Gerner, R. R., Batachari, L. E., Malfavon, M., Zhu, Q., Weldon, K., et al. (2022) · Nature Microbiology · doi:10.1038/s41564-021-01050-3 · Cited by 385 · see citing works
Pertea, M., Shumate, A., Pertea, G., Varabyou, A., Breitwieser, F. P., Chang, Y.-C., Madugundu, A. K., Pandey, A., & Salzberg, S. L. (2018) · Genome Biology · doi:10.1186/s13059-018-1590-2 · Cited by 335 · see citing works
Aged skeletal stem cells generate an inflammatory degenerative niche
Ambrosi, T. H., Marecic, O., McArdle, A., Sinha, R., Gulati, G. S., Tong, X., Wang, Y., Steininger, H. M., Hoover, M. Y., Koepke, L. S., et al. (2021) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-021-03795-7 · Cited by 392 · see citing works
Dube, U., Del-Aguila, J. L., Li, Z., Budde, J. P., Jiang, S., Hsu, S., Ibanez, L., Fernandez, M. V., Farias, F., Norton, J., et al. (2019) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/s41593-019-0501-5 · Cited by 345 · see citing works
Sahraeian, S. M. E., Mohiyuddin, M., Sebra, R., Tilgner, H., Afshar, P. T., Au, K. F., Bani Asadi, N., Gerstein, M. B., Wong, W. H., Snyder, M. P., et al. (2017) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-017-00050-4 · Cited by 376 · see citing works
Gut-licensed IFNγ+ NK cells drive LAMP1+TRAIL+ anti-inflammatory astrocytes
Sanmarco, L. M., Wheeler, M. A., Gutiérrez-Vázquez, C., Polonio, C. M., Linnerbauer, M., Pinho-Ribeiro, F. A., Li, Z., Giovannoni, F., Batterman, K. V., Scalisi, G., et al. (2021) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-020-03116-4 · Cited by 331 · see citing works
Cuomo, A. S. E., Seaton, D. D., McCarthy, D. J., Martinez, I., Bonder, M. J., Garcia-Bernardo, J., Amatya, S., Madrigal, P., Isaacson, A., Buettner, F., et al. (2020) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-020-14457-z · Cited by 331 · see citing works
Single-cell and spatial transcriptomics: deciphering brain complexity in health and disease
Piwecka, M., Rajewsky, N., & Rybak-Wolf, A. (2023) · Nature Reviews Neurology · doi:10.1038/s41582-023-00809-y · Cited by 320 · see citing works
Dream: powerful differential expression analysis for repeated measures designs
Hoffman, G. E., & Roussos, P. (2021) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btaa687 · Cited by 319 · see citing works
Li, X., Francies, H. E., Secrier, M., Perner, J., Miremadi, A., Galeano-Dalmau, N., Barendt, W. J., Letchford, L., Leyden, G. M., Goffin, E. K., et al. (2018) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-018-05190-9 · Cited by 316 · see citing works
Organoid Cultures as Preclinical Models of Non–Small Cell Lung Cancer
Shi, R., Radulovich, N., Ng, C., Liu, N., Notsuda, H., Cabanero, M., Martins-Filho, S. N., Raghavan, V., Li, Q., Mer, A. S., et al. (2020) · Clinical Cancer Research · doi:10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-19-1376 · Cited by 316 · see citing works
Sun, W., Samimi, H., Gamez, M., Zare, H., & Frost, B. (2018) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/s41593-018-0194-1 · Cited by 315 · see citing works
Endogenous retroviral signatures predict immunotherapy response in clear cell renal cell carcinoma
Smith, C. C., Beckermann, K. E., Bortone, D. S., De Cubas, A. A., Bixby, L. M., Lee, S. J., Panda, A., Ganesan, S., Bhanot, G., Wallen, E. M., et al. (2018) · Journal of Clinical Investigation · doi:10.1172/jci121476 · Cited by 303 · see citing works
Breast tumours maintain a reservoir of subclonal diversity during expansion
Minussi, D. C., Nicholson, M. D., Ye, H., Davis, A., Wang, K., Baker, T., Tarabichi, M., Sei, E., Du, H., Rabbani, M., et al. (2021) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-021-03357-x · Cited by 256 · see citing works
Guler, G. D., Tindell, C. A., Pitti, R., Wilson, C., Nichols, K., KaiWai Cheung, T., Kim, H.-J., Wongchenko, M., Yan, Y., Haley, B., et al. (2017) · Cancer Cell · doi:10.1016/j.ccell.2017.07.002 · Cited by 277 · see citing works
Frodermann, V., Rohde, D., Courties, G., Severe, N., Schloss, M. J., Amatullah, H., McAlpine, C. S., Cremer, S., Hoyer, F. F., Ji, F., et al. (2019) · Nature Medicine · doi:10.1038/s41591-019-0633-x · Cited by 292 · see citing works
A heterochromatin-dependent transcription machinery drives piRNA expression
Andersen, P. R., Tirian, L., Vunjak, M., & Brennecke, J. (2017) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature23482 · Cited by 280 · see citing works
KDM5B promotes immune evasion by recruiting SETDB1 to silence retroelements
Zhang, S.-M., Cai, W. L., Liu, X., Thakral, D., Luo, J., Chan, L. H., McGeary, M. K., Song, E., Blenman, K. R. M., Micevic, G., et al. (2021) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-021-03994-2 · Cited by 272 · see citing works
The <i>MS4A</i> gene cluster is a key modulator of soluble TREM2 and Alzheimer’s disease risk
Deming, Y., Filipello, F., Cignarella, F., Cantoni, C., Hsu, S., Mikesell, R., Li, Z., Del-Aguila, J. L., Dube, U., Farias, F. G., et al. (2019) · Science Translational Medicine · doi:10.1126/scitranslmed.aau2291 · Cited by 271 · see citing works
“2 (78) transcript expression quantification of the coding transcripts of H.”
Gene expression variability across cells and species shapes innate immunity
Hagai, T., Chen, X., Miragaia, R. J., Rostom, R., Gomes, T., Kunowska, N., Henriksson, J., Park, J.-E., Proserpio, V., Donati, G., et al. (2018) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-018-0657-2 · Cited by 220 · see citing works
The multiple myeloma microenvironment is defined by an inflammatory stromal cell landscape
de Jong, M. M. E., Kellermayer, Z., Papazian, N., Tahri, S., Hofste op Bruinink, D., Hoogenboezem, R., Sanders, M. A., van de Woestijne, P. C., Bos, P. K., Khandanpour, C., et al. (2021) · Nature Immunology · doi:10.1038/s41590-021-00931-3 · Cited by 250 · see citing works
Genetic and epigenetic characteristics of inflammatory bowel disease-associated colorectal cancer
Rajamäki, K., Taira, A., Katainen, R., Välimäki, N., Kuosmanen, A., Plaketti, R.-M., Seppälä, T. T., Ahtiainen, M., Wirta, E.-V., Vartiainen, E., et al. (2021) · Gastroenterology · doi:10.1053/j.gastro.2021.04.042 · Cited by 230 · see citing works
Koda, Y., Teratani, T., Chu, P.-S., Hagihara, Y., Mikami, Y., Harada, Y., Tsujikawa, H., Miyamoto, K., Suzuki, T., Taniki, N., et al. (2021) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-021-24734-0 · Cited by 219 · see citing works
Loss-of-function variants in ADCY3 increase risk of obesity and type 2 diabetes
Grarup, N., Moltke, I., Andersen, M. K., Dalby, M., Vitting-Seerup, K., Kern, T., Mahendran, Y., Jørsboe, E., Larsen, C. V. L., Dahl-Petersen, I. K., et al. (2018) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/s41588-017-0022-7 · Cited by 216 · see citing works
Liu, W., Taso, O., Wang, R., Bayram, S., Graham, A. C., Garcia-Reitboeck, P., Mallach, A., Andrews, W. D., Piers, T. M., Botia, J. A., et al. (2020) · Human Molecular Genetics · doi:10.1093/hmg/ddaa209 · Cited by 214 · see citing works
Tumour-selective activity of RAS-GTP inhibition in pancreatic cancer
Wasko, U. N., Jiang, J., Dalton, T. C., Curiel-Garcia, A., Edwards, A. C., Wang, Y., Lee, B., Orlen, M., Tian, S., Stalnecker, C. A., et al. (2024) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-024-07379-z · Cited by 209 · see citing works
SARS-CoV-2 Infects Human Engineered Heart Tissues and Models COVID-19 Myocarditis
Bailey, A. L., Dmytrenko, O., Greenberg, L., Bredemeyer, A. L., Ma, P., Liu, J., Penna, V., Winkler, E. S., Sviben, S., Brooks, E., et al. (2021) · JACC: Basic to Translational Science · doi:10.1016/j.jacbts.2021.01.002 · Cited by 193 · see citing works
Single-Cell RNA-Sequencing Reveals a Continuous Spectrum of Differentiation in Hematopoietic Cells
Macaulay, I. C., Svensson, V., Labalette, C., Ferreira, L., Hamey, F., Voet, T., Teichmann, S. A., & Cvejic, A. (2016) · Cell Reports · doi:10.1016/j.celrep.2015.12.082 · Cited by 191 · see citing works
Love, M. I., Hogenesch, J. B., & Irizarry, R. A. (2016) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/nbt.3682 · Cited by 186 · see citing works
Self-citationTumor microbiome links cellular programs and immunity in pancreatic cancer
Ghaddar, B., Biswas, A., Harris, C., Omary, M. B., Carpizo, D. R., Blaser, M. J., & De, S. (2022) · Cancer Cell · doi:10.1016/j.ccell.2022.09.009 · Cited by 181 · see citing works
A new genetic strategy for targeting microglia in development and disease
McKinsey, G. L., Lizama, C. O., Keown-Lang, A. E., Niu, A., Santander, N., Larpthaveesarp, A., Chee, E., Gonzalez, F. F., & Arnold, T. D. (2020) · eLife · doi:10.7554/elife.54590 · Cited by 176 · see citing works
Christophersen, A., Lund, E. G., Snir, O., Solà, E., Kanduri, C., Dahal-Koirala, S., Zühlke, S., Molberg, Ø., Utz, P. J., Rohani-Pichavant, M., et al. (2019) · Nature Medicine · doi:10.1038/s41591-019-0403-9 · Cited by 164 · see citing works
Rizzardi, L. F., Hickey, P. F., Rodriguez DiBlasi, V., Tryggvadóttir, R., Callahan, C. M., Idrizi, A., Hansen, K. D., & Feinberg, A. P. (2019) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/s41593-018-0297-8 · Cited by 146 · see citing works
Gabriele, M., Vulto-van Silfhout, A. T., Germain, P.-L., Vitriolo, A., Kumar, R., Douglas, E., Haan, E., Kosaki, K., Takenouchi, T., Rauch, A., et al. (2017) · The American Journal of Human Genetics · doi:10.1016/j.ajhg.2017.05.006 · Cited by 163 · see citing works
Sceneay, J., Goreczny, G. J., Wilson, K., Morrow, S., DeCristo, M. J., Ubellacker, J. M., Qin, Y., Laszewski, T., Stover, D. G., Barrera, V., et al. (2019) · Cancer Discovery · doi:10.1158/2159-8290.cd-18-1454 · Cited by 156 · see citing works
Litvinchuk, A., Suh, J. H., Guo, J. L., Lin, K., Davis, S. S., Bien-Ly, N., Tycksen, E., Tabor, G. T., Remolina Serrano, J., Manis, M., et al. (2024) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2023.10.023 · Cited by 161 · see citing works
Discovery of a Functional Covalent Ligand Targeting an Intrinsically Disordered Cysteine within MYC
Boike, L., Cioffi, A. G., Majewski, F. C., Co, J., Henning, N. J., Jones, M. D., Liu, G., McKenna, J. M., Tallarico, J. A., Schirle, M., et al. (2021) · Cell Chemical Biology · doi:10.1016/j.chembiol.2020.09.001 · Cited by 154 · see citing works
Monocytes re-enter the bone marrow during fasting and alter the host response to infection
Janssen, H., Kahles, F., Liu, D., Downey, J., Koekkoek, L. L., Roudko, V., D’Souza, D., McAlpine, C. S., Halle, L., Poller, W. C., et al. (2023) · Immunity · doi:10.1016/j.immuni.2023.01.024 · Cited by 142 · see citing works
Beagan, J. A., Pastuzyn, E. D., Fernandez, L. R., Guo, M. H., Feng, K., Titus, K. R., Chandrashekar, H., Shepherd, J. D., & Phillips-Cremins, J. E. (2020) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/s41593-020-0634-6 · Cited by 143 · see citing works
A survey of k-mer methods and applications in bioinformatics
Moeckel, C., Mareboina, M., Konnaris, M. A., Chan, C. S. Y., Mouratidis, I., Montgomery, A., Chantzi, N., Pavlopoulos, G. A., & Georgakopoulos-Soares, I. (2024) · Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal · doi:10.1016/j.csbj.2024.05.025 · Cited by 131 · see citing works
“Recently, k-mer-based alignment algorithms have been utilized in detecting and filtering out contamination by comparing observed k-mers against a BFCounter[201], CHTKC [202], Discount[203], DSK2 [204], GECKO[205], Gerbil [206], Jellyfish2[8], KAnalyze [207], KCMBT[208], KCOSS [209], KHMer[210], KMC3 [45], KmerAnalysis…”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialAging clocks based on accumulating stochastic variation
Meyer, D. H., & Schumacher, B. (2024) · Nature Aging · doi:10.1038/s43587-024-00619-x · Cited by 128 · see citing works
Incorporation of a nucleoside analog maps genome repair sites in postmitotic human neurons
Reid, D. A., Reed, P. J., Schlachetzki, J. C. M., Nitulescu, I. I., Chou, G., Tsui, E. C., Jones, J. R., Chandran, S., Lu, A. T., McClain, C. A., et al. (2021) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.abb9032 · Cited by 121 · see citing works
From tissues to cell types and back: single-cell gene expression analysis of tissue architecture
Chen, X., Teichmann, S. A., & Meyer, K. B. (2018) · Annual Review of Biomedical Data Science · doi:10.1146/annurev-biodatasci-080917-013452 · Cited by 112 · see citing works
Fazal, R., Boeynaems, S., Swijsen, A., De Decker, M., Fumagalli, L., Moisse, M., Vanneste, J., Guo, W., Boon, R., Vercruysse, T., et al. (2021) · The EMBO Journal · doi:10.15252/embj.2020106177 · Cited by 108 · see citing works
Multi-Omics Approaches to Define Calcific Aortic Valve Disease Pathogenesis
Blaser, M. C., Kraler, S., Lüscher, T. F., & Aikawa, E. (2021) · Circulation Research · doi:10.1161/circresaha.120.317979 · Cited by 109 · see citing works
A tissue injury sensing and repair pathway distinct from host pathogen defense
Liu, S., Hur, Y. H., Cai, X., Cong, Q., Yang, Y., Xu, C., Bilate, A. M., Gonzales, K. A. U., Parigi, S. M., Cowley, C. J., et al. (2023) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2023.03.031 · Cited by 108 · see citing works
Small-Molecule PAPD5 Inhibitors Restore Telomerase Activity in Patient Stem Cells
Nagpal, N., Wang, J., Zeng, J., Lo, E., Moon, D. H., Luk, K., Braun, R. O., Burroughs, L. M., Keel, S. B., Reilly, C., et al. (2020) · Cell Stem Cell · doi:10.1016/j.stem.2020.03.016 · Cited by 105 · see citing works
Li, Z., Farias, F. H. G., Dube, U., Del-Aguila, J. L., Mihindukulasuriya, K. A., Fernandez, M. V., Ibanez, L., Budde, J. P., Wang, F., Lake, A. M., et al. (2020) · Acta Neuropathologica · doi:10.1007/s00401-019-02066-0 · Cited by 85 · see citing works
Epigenomic map of human liver reveals principles of zonated morphogenic and metabolic control
Brosch, M., Kattler, K., Herrmann, A., von Schönfels, W., Nordström, K., Seehofer, D., Damm, G., Becker, T., Zeissig, S., Nehring, S., et al. (2018) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-018-06611-5 · Cited by 98 · see citing works
Hennrich, M. L., Romanov, N., Horn, P., Jaeger, S., Eckstein, V., Steeples, V., Ye, F., Ding, X., Poisa-Beiro, L., Lai, M. C., et al. (2018) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-018-06353-4 · Cited by 101 · see citing works
Guo, J., Otis, J. M., Suciu, S. K., Catalano, C., Xing, L., Constable, S., Wachten, D., Gupton, S., Lee, J., Lee, A., et al. (2019) · Developmental Cell · doi:10.1016/j.devcel.2019.11.005 · Cited by 100 · see citing works
Rapid idiosyncratic mechanisms of clinical resistance to KRAS G12C inhibition
Tsai, Y. S., Woodcock, M. G., Azam, S. H., Thorne, L. B., Kanchi, K. L., Parker, J. S., Vincent, B. G., & Pecot, C. V. (2022) · Journal of Clinical Investigation · doi:10.1172/jci155523 · Cited by 103 · see citing works
Germain, P.-L., & Testa, G. (2017) · Stem Cell Reports · doi:10.1016/j.stemcr.2017.05.012 · Cited by 94 · see citing works
Epigenomic priming of immune genes implicates oligodendroglia in multiple sclerosis susceptibility
Meijer, M., Agirre, E., Kabbe, M., van Tuijn, C. A., Heskol, A., Zheng, C., Mendanha Falcão, A., Bartosovic, M., Kirby, L., Calini, D., et al. (2022) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2021.12.034 · Cited by 98 · see citing works
Rossaert, E., Pollari, E., Jaspers, T., Van Helleputte, L., Jarpe, M., Van Damme, P., De Bock, K., Moisse, M., & Van Den Bosch, L. (2019) · Acta Neuropathologica Communications · doi:10.1186/s40478-019-0750-2 · Cited by 93 · see citing works
Novel insights from a multiomics dissection of the Hayflick limit
Chan, M., Yuan, H., Soifer, I., Maile, T. M., Wang, R. Y., Ireland, A., O'Brien, J. J., Goudeau, J., Chan, L. J., Vijay, T., et al. (2022) · eLife · doi:10.7554/elife.70283 · Cited by 99 · see citing works
TEAD Inhibition Overcomes YAP1/TAZ-Driven Primary and Acquired Resistance to KRASG12C Inhibitors
Edwards, A. C., Stalnecker, C. A., Jean Morales, A., Taylor, K. E., Klomp, J. E., Klomp, J. A., Waters, A. M., Sudhakar, N., Hallin, J., Tang, T. T., et al. (2023) · Cancer Research · doi:10.1158/0008-5472.can-23-2994 · Cited by 91 · see citing works
Guo, X., Nie, H., Zhang, W., Li, J., Ge, J., Xie, B., Hu, W., Zhu, Y., Zhong, N., Zhang, X., et al. (2025) · Cancer Cell · doi:10.1016/j.ccell.2025.01.001 · Cited by 100 · see citing works
Guo, J. L., Braun, D., Fitzgerald, G. A., Hsieh, Y.-T., Rougé, L., Litvinchuk, A., Steffek, M., Propson, N. E., Heffner, C. M., Discenza, C., et al. (2025) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2024.10.027 · Cited by 91 · see citing works
Ito, F., Kato, K., Yanatori, I., Murohara, T., & Toyokuni, S. (2021) · Redox Biology · doi:10.1016/j.redox.2021.102174 · Cited by 88 · see citing works
“0) [25] in the mapping-based mode with the transcriptome index created from the Homo sapiens genome assembly (GRCh38.”
MethodDevelopment of a high-productivity, halophilic, thermotolerant microalga Picochlorum renovo
Dahlin, L. R., Gerritsen, A. T., Henard, C. A., Van Wychen, S., Linger, J. G., Kunde, Y., Hovde, B. T., Starkenburg, S. R., Posewitz, M. C., & Guarnieri, M. T. (2019) · Communications Biology · doi:10.1038/s42003-019-0620-2 · Cited by 86 · see citing works
Haplotype-aware pantranscriptome analyses using spliced pangenome graphs
Sibbesen, J. A., Eizenga, J. M., Novak, A. M., Sirén, J., Chang, X., Garrison, E., & Paten, B. (2023) · Nature Methods · doi:10.1038/s41592-022-01731-9 · Cited by 83 · see citing works
Tumor heterogeneity in VHL drives metastasis in clear cell renal cell carcinoma
Hu, J., Tan, P., Ishihara, M., Bayley, N. A., Schokrpur, S., Reynoso, J. G., Zhang, Y., Lim, R. J., Dumitras, C., Yang, L., et al. (2023) · Signal Transduction and Targeted Therapy · doi:10.1038/s41392-023-01362-2 · Cited by 85 · see citing works
Shi, H., Wang, X., Li, F., Gerlach, B. D., Yurdagul, A., Moore, M. P., Zeldin, S., Zhang, H., Cai, B., Zheng, Z., et al. (2022) · Science Translational Medicine · doi:10.1126/scitranslmed.abp8309 · Cited by 85 · see citing works
HNF1A recruits KDM6A to activate differentiated acinar cell programs that suppress pancreatic cancer
Kalisz, M., Bernardo, E., Beucher, A., Maestro, M. A., del Pozo, N., Millán, I., Haeberle, L., Schlensog, M., Safi, S. A., Knoefel, W. T., et al. (2020) · The EMBO Journal · doi:10.15252/embj.2019102808 · Cited by 77 · see citing works
Loomis, K. H., Wu, S. K., Ernlund, A., Zudock, K., Reno, A., Blount, K., & Karig, D. K. (2021) · Microbiome · doi:10.1186/s40168-020-00963-1 · Cited by 74 · see citing works
The cardioprotective effects of semaglutide exceed those of dietary weight loss in mice with HFpEF
Withaar, C., Meems, L. M. G., Nollet, E. E., Schouten, E. M., Schroeder, M. A., Knudsen, L. B., Niss, K., Madsen, C. T., Hoegl, A., Mazzoni, G., et al. (2023) · JACC: Basic to Translational Science · doi:10.1016/j.jacbts.2023.05.012 · Cited by 74 · see citing works
Modeling transcriptomic age using knowledge-primed artificial neural networks
Holzscheck, N., Falckenhayn, C., Söhle, J., Kristof, B., Siegner, R., Werner, A., Schössow, J., Jürgens, C., Völzke, H., Wenck, H., et al. (2021) · npj Aging and Mechanisms of Disease · doi:10.1038/s41514-021-00068-5 · Cited by 71 · see citing works
Dedifferentiation and neuronal repression define familial Alzheimer’s disease
Caldwell, A. B., Liu, Q., Schroth, G. P., Galasko, D. R., Yuan, S. H., Wagner, S. L., & Subramaniam, S. (2020) · Science Advances · doi:10.1126/sciadv.aba5933 · Cited by 69 · see citing works
Transcriptome-wide analysis of differential expression in perturbation atlases
Nadig, A., Replogle, J. M., Pogson, A. N., Murthy, M., McCarroll, S. A., Weissman, J. S., Robinson, E. B., & O’Connor, L. J. (2025) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/s41588-025-02169-3 · Cited by 70 · see citing works
- Authors
- Patro, R., Duggal, G., Love, M. I., Irizarry, R. A., & Kingsford, C.
- Affiliations
- Stony Brook University (US)
- DNAnexus (United States) (US)
- Harvard University (US)
- Carnegie Mellon University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Patro, Rob
- Kingsford, Carl
- Venue
- Nature Methods
- Published
- 2017-03-06
- Volume
- 14
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 417-419
- ISSN
- 1548-7091 (ISSN-L)
- 1548-7105
- PMC
- PMC5600148
- OpenAlex
- W2592811885
- Semantic Scholar
- 30ca32529ca227263b3a1e5986fb57b22afde2bd
- Cited by
- 12,700
- References
- 36
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1822 · 2025: 2138 · 2024: 2056 · 2023: 1605 · 2022: 1559 · 2021: 1474 · 2020: 978 · 2019: 613 · 2018: 301 · 2017: 107 · 2016: 40 · 2015: 2 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 226.51
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- doi.org
- Licence
- cc-by-nc-nd
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- Nature Methods (publishedVersion)
- bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- Digital Access to Scholarship at Harvard (DASH) (Harvard University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Funders
- National Science Foundation (1564917, 1319998, 1256087)
- Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation (GBMF4554)
- Carnegie Mellon University
- National Institutes of Health
- Directorate for Biological Sciences
- Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council
- National Human Genome Research Institute (R21HG006913, R01HG005220, R01HG007104)
- National Cancer Institute (T32CA009337)
- National Institute of General Medical Sciences (R01GM083084)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Single-cell and spatial transcriptomics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Gene expression and cancer classification
- Keywords
- salmon, RNA-seq, bias correction, differential expression analysis
- MeSH terms
- Algorithms, Base Composition, Bayes Theorem, Sequence Analysis, RNA, Gene Expression Profiling
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-05.
Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-05.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review