Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 196

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 25 of the 25 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Endogenous retroviruses promote homeostatic and inflammatory responses to the microbiota

Open access
Lima-Junior, Djalma S., Krishnamurthy, Siddharth R., Bouladoux, Nicolas, Collins, Nicholas, Han, Seong-Ji, Chen, Erin Y., Constantinides, Michael G., Link, Verena M., Lim, Ai Ing, Enamorado, Michel, Cataisson, Christophe, Gil, Louis, Rao, Indira, Farley, Taylor K., Koroleva, Galina, Attig, Jan, Yuspa, Stuart H., Fischbach, Michael A., Kassiotis, George, Belkaid, Yasmine·2021·Cell

Abstract

The microbiota plays a fundamental role in regulating host immunity. However, the processes involved in the initiation and regulation of immunity to the microbiota remain largely unknown. Here, we show that the skin microbiota promotes the discrete expression of defined endogenous retroviruses (ERVs). Keratinocyte-intrinsic responses to ERVs depended on cyclic GMP-AMP synthase (cGAS)/stimulator of interferon genes protein (STING) signaling and promoted the induction of commensal-specific T cells. Inhibition of ERV reverse transcription significantly impacted these responses, resulting in impaired immunity to the microbiota and its associated tissue repair function. Conversely, a lipid-enriched diet primed the skin for heightened ERV- expression in response to commensal colonization, leading to increased immune responses and tissue inflammation. Together, our results support the idea that the host may have co-opted its endogenous virome as a means to communicate with the exogenous microbiota, resulting in a multi-kingdom dialog that controls both tissue homeostasis and inflammation.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.cell.2021.05.020

Cites

25 of 25 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 25 references

Cited by

See all 196

Metadata

Authors
Lima-Junior, D. S., Krishnamurthy, S. R., Bouladoux, N., Collins, N., Han, S.-J., Chen, E. Y., Constantinides, M. G., Link, V. M., Lim, A. I., Enamorado, M., Cataisson, C., Gil, L., Rao, I., Farley, T. K., Koroleva, G., Attig, J., Yuspa, S. H., Fischbach, M. A., Kassiotis, G., & Belkaid, Y.
Venue
Cell
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2021-07
Volume
184
Issue
14
Pages
3794-3811.e19
ISSN
0092-8674 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3175735655
Cited by
196
References
25
FWCI
9.37
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
hybrid

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Endogenous retroviruses promote homeostatic and inflammatory responses to the microbiota. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.cell.2021.05.020
The paper
Lima-Junior, D. S., Krishnamurthy, S. R., Bouladoux, N., Collins, N., Han, S.-J., Chen, E. Y., Constantinides, M. G., Link, V. M., Lim, A. I., Enamorado, M., Cataisson, C., Gil, L., Rao, I., Farley, T. K., Koroleva, G., Attig, J., Yuspa, S. H., Fischbach, M. A., Kassiotis, G., & Belkaid, Y. (2021). Endogenous retroviruses promote homeostatic and inflammatory responses to the microbiota. Cell. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2021.05.020

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.