Cited by 36Blockchain Technology Applications and SecurityIndigenous Health, Education, and RightsRace, Genetics, and Society

Establishing a blockchain-enabled Indigenous data sovereignty framework for genomic data

Open access
Mackey, Tim K., Calac, Alec J., Chenna Keshava, B S, Yracheta, Joseph, Tsosie, Krystal S., Fox, Keolu·2022·Cell

Abstract

Technological advances have enabled the rapid generation of health and genomic data, though rarely do these technologies account for the values and priorities of marginalized communities. In this commentary, we conceptualize a blockchain genomics data framework built out of the concept of Indigenous Data Sovereignty.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.cell.2022.06.030

Cites

14 of 14 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Smart contracts can automatically enforce consent parameters, such as temporal limitations, usage restrictions, or benefit-sharing triggers.

    “Additionally, smart contracts can automatically enforce consent parameters, such as temporal limitations, usage restrictions, or benefit-sharing triggers (Mackey et al. 2022).”

    From Preventing AI extractivism: the case for braiding indigenous data justice with ABS for stronger AI data governance (2026) · cites this paper as Mackey et al. 2022

    The Background says smart contracts can execute predetermined conditions for data access and sharing and can automate an agreement after community approval. It does not specify temporal limitations, usage restrictions, or benefit-sharing triggers as conditions those contracts enforce. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Part of this paper’s reference list could not be split into single entries.

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Mackey, T. K., Calac, A. J., Chenna Keshava, B. S., Yracheta, J., Tsosie, K. S., & Fox, K.
Affiliations
  • San Diego Supercomputer Center (US)
  • University of California San Diego (US)
Corresponding author
Fox, Keolu
Venue
Cell
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2022-07
Volume
185
Issue
15
Pages
2626-2631
ISSN
0092-8674 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4286266880
Cited by
36
References
14
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 6
FWCI
6.93
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Cell (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Blockchain Technology Applications and Security
  • Social Sciences › Health › Indigenous Health, Education, and Rights
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Race, Genetics, and Society
Keywords
blockchain, Indigenous data sovereignty, genomic data, health data, data governance, indigenous peoples, marginalized communities, data ownership
MeSH terms
Blockchain, Technology, Computer Security, Genomics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review