Cited by 18Liver physiology and pathologyTissue Engineering and Regenerative MedicineNerve injury and regeneration

Netrin-1 promotes liver regeneration possibly by facilitating vagal nerve repair after partial hepatectomy in mice

Open access
Wang, Zongding, Jiang, Tiemin, Aji, Tuerganaili, Aimulajiang, Kalibixiati, Liu, Yanshi, Lv, Guodong, Wen, Hao·2022·Cellular Signalling

Abstract

Hepatic regeneration after hepatectomy is a great concern in clinical practice. Recently, the neuronal guidance protein netrin-1 has been reported to enhance regeneration after nerve injury. The goal of this study was to preliminarily investigate whether netrin-1 stimulates vagus nerve regeneration to promote liver regeneration after partial hepatectomy in mice. The expression of netrin-1 in murine remnant livers after partial hepatectomy (PHx) was evaluated in initial studies. C57BL/6 mice that received exogenous netrin-1 after PHx were used to examine liver regeneration. PHx was performed in wild-type mice after adeno-associated virus injection (Ntn1 gene silencing) to detect the impact of endogenous netrin-1. After PHx and hepatic branch vagotomy (HV), the mice were injected with or without netrin-1 to evaluate the effects on hepatic regeneration and vagal nerve recovery. Significant reductions in netrin-1 at the transcript and protein levels in murine liver tissue after hepatectomy were observed. Subsequent studies of netrin-1 administration revealed the promotion of hepatocyte proliferation and specific growth factors contributing to liver repair and a decrease in hepatic-specific injury enzymes. Furthermore, the opposite results were observed in the netrin-1 knockdown group. HV delayed liver regeneration after PHx. However, this retardation was reversed by exogenous netrin-1 supplementation. In addition, the results of nerve growth and vagal nerve repair in the remnant liver suggested that netrin-1 promoted vagal nerve regeneration after hepatectomy. Netrin-1 accelerates liver regeneration after partial hepatectomy in mice, and the potential mechanism is related to the promotion of vagus nerve repair and regeneration.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.cellsig.2021.110227

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wang, Z., Jiang, T., Aji, T., Aimulajiang, K., Liu, Y., Lv, G., & Wen, H.
Affiliations
First Affiliated Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University (CN)
Corresponding author
Wen, Hao
Venue
Cellular Signalling
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2022-03
Volume
91
Pages
110227
ISSN
0898-6568 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4200118410
Cited by
18
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 1
FWCI
1.67
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Cellular Signalling (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Hepatology › Liver physiology and pathology
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Nerve injury and regeneration
Keywords
netrin-1, liver regeneration, partial hepatectomy, hepatocyte proliferation, gene silencing
MeSH terms
Netrin-1, Animals, Hepatectomy, Liver, Liver Regeneration, Mice, Inbred C57BL, Vagus Nerve, Mice

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review