Cited by 40Organ Transplantation Techniques and OutcomesLiver physiology and pathologyNerve injury and regeneration

Immunohistochemical studies on the innervation of human transplanted liver.

Dhillon, Amar P., Sankey, Elizabeth A., Wang, Jiahua H., Wightman, A. Kay, Mathur, Sandip, Burroughs, Andrew K., Scheuer, Peter J.·1992·The Journal of Pathology

Abstract

The changing pattern of innervation in the human transplanted liver was studied from the day of transplantation to 5 years later. Seven liver biopsies from non-transplant controls, 37 liver biopsies from 22 transplant patients, and one of these biopsied livers removed at retransplantation, were available for the study. Sections were immunostained for protein gene product 9.5 (PGP 9.5), neurone-specific enolase (NSE), S-100 protein, and vasoactive intestinal polypeptide. NSE and PGP 9.5 demonstrated nerves most successfully in our tissues. Staining for most small nerves was reduced by day 5 post-transplantation. Scanty fine nerves could be detected from day 13 to day 241 in occasional biopsies. Consistently identifiable immunostaining of PGP 9.5 and NSE nerve fibres was again apparent in portal areas after this time in all but one case. The findings indicate that in transplanted liver limited reinnervation can eventually take place. This could be due to either proliferation of intrinsic nerves, or regrowth of extrinsic nerves, or both.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/path.1711670209

Cites

22 of 22 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 23 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Dhillon, A. P., Sankey, E. A., Wang, J. H., Wightman, A. K., Mathur, S., Burroughs, A. K., & Scheuer, P. J.
Affiliations
The Royal Free Hospital (GB)
Corresponding author
Dhillon, Amar P.
Venue
The Journal of Pathology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1992-06
Volume
167
Issue
2
Pages
211-216
ISSN
  • 0022-3417 (ISSN-L)
  • 1096-9896
OpenAlex
W2018556838
Cited by
40
References
23
Citations by year
2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2014: 1 · 2012: 1
FWCI
2.93
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Journal of Pathology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Organ Transplantation Techniques and Outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Hepatology › Liver physiology and pathology
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Nerve injury and regeneration
Keywords
liver transplantation, innervation, reinnervation, PGP 9.5, neuron-specific enolase, S-100 protein, vasoactive intestinal peptide, retransplantation
MeSH terms
Humans, Immunohistochemistry, Liver, Nerve Regeneration, S100 Proteins, Neuropeptides, Phosphopyruvate Hydratase, Vasoactive Intestinal Peptide, Liver Transplantation, Ubiquitin Thiolesterase

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review