Cited by 127Genomics and Chromatin DynamicsImmunotherapy and Immune ResponsesT-cell and B-cell Immunology

PU.1 Level-Directed Chromatin Structure Remodeling at the Irf8 Gene Drives Dendritic Cell Commitment

Open access
Schönheit, Jörg, Kuhl, Christiane, Gebhardt, Marie Luise, Klett, Francisco Fernández, Riemke, Pia, Scheller, Marina, Huang, Gang, Naumann, Ronald +5 more·2013·Cell Reports

Abstract

Dendritic cells (DCs) are essential regulators of immune responses; however, transcriptional mechanisms that establish DC lineage commitment are poorly defined. Here, we report that the PU.1 transcription factor induces specific remodeling of the higher-order chromatin structure at the interferon regulatory factor 8 (Irf8) gene to initiate DC fate choice. An Irf8 reporter mouse enabled us to pinpoint an initial progenitor stage at which DCs separate from other myeloid lineages in the bone marrow. In the absence of Irf8, this progenitor undergoes DC-to-neutrophil reprogramming, indicating that DC commitment requires an active, Irf8-dependent escape from alternative myeloid lineage potential. Mechanistically, myeloid Irf8 expression depends on high PU.1 levels, resulting in local chromosomal looping and activation of a lineage- and developmental-stage-specific cis-enhancer. These data delineate PU.1 as a concentration-dependent rheostat of myeloid lineage selection by controlling long-distance contacts between regulatory elements and suggest that specific higher-order chromatin remodeling at the Irf8 gene determines DC differentiation.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.celrep.2013.04.007

Cites

11 of 11 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • PU.1 directly induces IRF8 transcription by binding to its enhancer and promoter.

    “PU.1 directly induces IRF8 transcription by binding to its enhancer and promoter [50], while IRF8 reciprocally enhances PU.1 expression by targeting an upstream regulatory element of the PU.1 gene [29, 39].”

    From Targeting Microglial Transcriptional Reprogramming as a Therapy Strategy for Alzheimer's Disease (2026) · cites this paper as [50]

    In “PU.1 Binding Is Necessary for −50 kb Enhancer Activity and Induces Chromatin Remodeling” (page unavailable), the paper reports PU.1 binding at the Irf8 enhancer and describes PU.1 as a direct activator of Irf8 expression. It reports enhancer–promoter contact, but does not establish that PU.1 also binds the promoter; that part of the attributed mechanism is unsupported. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Schönheit, J., Kuhl, C., Gebhardt, M. L., Klett, F. F., Riemke, P., Scheller, M., Huang, G., Naumann, R., Leutz, A., Stocking, C., Priller, J., Andrade-Navarro, M. A., & Rosenbauer, F.
Affiliations
  • Max Delbrück Center (DE)
  • University of Münster (DE)
  • Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center (US)
  • Max Planck Institute of Molecular Cell Biology and Genetics (DE)
  • Leibniz Institute of Virology (LIV) (DE)
  • Stiftung Charité (DE)
Corresponding author
Rosenbauer, Frank
Venue
Cell Reports
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2013-05
Volume
3
Issue
5
Pages
1617-1628
ISSN
2211-1247 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2145034432
Cited by
127
References
11
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 14 · 2013: 2
FWCI
5.98
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Cell Reports (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • MDC Repository (Max-Delbrueck-Center for Molecular Medicine) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
  • Max Planck Institute for Plasma Physics (submittedVersion)
  • MPG.PuRe (Max Planck Society) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
  • Deutsche Krebshilfe
  • Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Chromatin Dynamics
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › Immunotherapy and Immune Responses
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › T-cell and B-cell Immunology
Keywords
PU.1, IRF8, dendritic cell differentiation, myeloid lineage commitment, chromatin looping, long-range chromatin interactions, myeloid progenitor cells
MeSH terms
Interferon Regulatory Factor-8, Proto-Oncogene Protein Spi-1, Animals, Base Sequence, Bone Marrow Cells, Cell Differentiation, Cells, Cultured, Chromatin, Dendritic Cells, Humans, Mice, Inbred C57BL, Promoter Regions, Genetic, Proto-Oncogene Proteins, Trans-Activators, Mice, Knockout, Cell Lineage, Myeloid Cells, Chromatin Assembly and Disassembly, Interferon Regulatory Factors, Mice

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review