Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 292

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 51 of the 51 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Combined TP53 and RB1 Loss Promotes Prostate Cancer Resistance to a Spectrum of Therapeutics and Confers Vulnerability to Replication Stress

Open access
Nyquist, Michael D., Corella, Alexandra, Coleman, Ilsa, De Sarkar, Navonil, Kaipainen, Arja, Ha, Gavin, Gulati, Roman, Ang, Lisa, Chatterjee, Payel, Lucas, Jared, Pritchard, Colin, Risbridger, Gail, Isaacs, John, Montgomery, Bruce, Morrissey, Colm, Corey, Eva, Nelson, Peter S.·2020·Cell Reports

Abstract

Prostate cancers (PCs) with loss of the potent tumor suppressors TP53 and RB1 exhibit poor outcomes. TP53 and RB1 also influence cell plasticity and are frequently lost in PCs with neuroendocrine (NE) differentiation. Therapeutic strategies that address these aggressive variant PCs are urgently needed. Using deep genomic profiling of 410 metastatic biopsies, we determine the relationships between combined TP53 and RB1 loss and PC phenotypes. Notably, 40% of TP53/RB1-deficient tumors are classified as AR-active adenocarcinomas, indicating that NE differentiation is not an obligate consequence of TP53/RB1 inactivation. A gene expression signature reflecting TP53/RB1 loss is associated with diminished responses to AR antagonists and reduced survival. These tumors exhibit high proliferation rates and evidence of elevated DNA repair processes. While tumor cells lacking TP53/RB1 are highly resistant to all single-agent therapeutics tested, the combination of PARP and ATR inhibition is found to produce significant responses, reflecting a clinically exploitable vulnerability resulting from replication stress.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.celrep.2020.107669

Cites

51 of 51 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 51 references

Cited by

See all 292

Metadata

Authors
Nyquist, M. D., Corella, A., Coleman, I., De Sarkar, N., Kaipainen, A., Ha, G., Gulati, R., Ang, L., Chatterjee, P., Lucas, J., Pritchard, C., Risbridger, G., Isaacs, J., Montgomery, B., Morrissey, C., Corey, E., & Nelson, P. S.
Venue
Cell Reports
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2020-05
Volume
31
Issue
8
Pages
107669
ISSN
2211-1247 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3030794881
Cited by
292
References
51
FWCI
18.10
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
gold

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Combined TP53 and RB1 Loss Promotes Prostate Cancer Resistance to a Spectrum of Therapeutics and Confers Vulnerability to Replication Stress. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.celrep.2020.107669
The paper
Nyquist, M. D., Corella, A., Coleman, I., De Sarkar, N., Kaipainen, A., Ha, G., Gulati, R., Ang, L., Chatterjee, P., Lucas, J., Pritchard, C., Risbridger, G., Isaacs, J., Montgomery, B., Morrissey, C., Corey, E., & Nelson, P. S. (2020). Combined TP53 and RB1 Loss Promotes Prostate Cancer Resistance to a Spectrum of Therapeutics and Confers Vulnerability to Replication Stress. Cell Reports. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.celrep.2020.107669

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.