Rapid and Scalable Profiling of Nascent RNA with fastGRO
Open accessPublished version of a preprint
Abstract
Abstract Genome-wide profiling of nascent RNA has become a fundamental tool to study transcription regulation. Over the past decade, next-generation sequencing has fostered development of a handful of techniques (i.e. GRO-seq, PRO-seq, TT-seq and NET-seq) that map unprocessed transcripts originating from both the coding and the noncoding portion of the genome. Unlike steady-state RNA sequencing, nascent RNA profiling mirrors the real-time activity of RNA Polymerases and provides an accurate readout of transcriptome-wide variations that occur during short time frames (i.e. response to external stimuli or rapid metabolic changes). Some species of nuclear RNAs, albeit functional, have a short half-life and can only be accurately gauged by nascent RNA techniques (i.e. lincRNAs and eRNAs). Furthermore, these techniques capture uncapped post-cleavage RNA at termination sites or promoter-associated antisense RNAs, providing a unique insight into RNAPII dynamics and processivity. Here we present a run-on assay with 4s-UTP labelling, followed by reversible biotinylation and affinity purification via streptavidin. Our protocol allows streamlined sample preparation within less than 3 days. We named the technique fastGRO (fast Global Run-On). We show that fastGRO is highly reproducible and yields a more complete and extensive coverage of nascent RNA than comparable techniques. Importantly, we demonstrate that fastGRO is scalable and can be performed with as few as 0.5×10^6 cells.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Global quantification of mammalian gene expression control
Schwanhäusser, B., Busse, D., Li, N., Dittmar, G., Schuchhardt, J., Wolf, J., Chen, W., & Selbach, M. (2011) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature10098 · Cited by 6,566 · cited 2× · see citing works
“Nucleosidetriphosphats (NTPs) containing a reactive thiol group are efficiently incorporated by RNA polymerase as evidenced by techniques such as 4SU-seq and TT-seq (Schwanhäusser et al., 2011; Schwalb et al., 2016) that rely on metabolic labeling starting from thionucleoside analogs.”
An atlas of active enhancers across human cell types and tissues
The FANTOM Consortium, Andersson, R., Gebhard, C., Miguel-Escalada, I., Hoof, I., Bornholdt, J., Boyd, M., Chen, Y., Zhao, X., Schmidl, C., et al. (2014) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature12787 · Cited by 2,550 · see citing works
Regulation of cytoplasmic mRNA decay
Schoenberg, D. R., & Maquat, L. E. (2012) · Nature Reviews Genetics · doi:10.1038/nrg3160 · Cited by 656 · see citing works
RNA Binding to CBP Stimulates Histone Acetylation and Transcription
Bose, D. A., Donahue, G., Reinberg, D., Shiekhattar, R., Bonasio, R., & Berger, S. L. (2017) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2016.12.020 · Cited by 426 · see citing works
Mayer, A., di Iulio, J., Maleri, S., Eser, U., Vierstra, J., Reynolds, A., Sandstrom, R., Stamatoyannopoulos, J. A., & Churchman, L. S. (2015) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2015.03.010 · Cited by 367 · see citing works
The end of the message: multiple protein–RNA interactions define the mRNA polyadenylation site
Shi, Y., & Manley, J. L. (2015) · Genes & Development · doi:10.1101/gad.261974.115 · Cited by 249 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
- Authors
- Barbieri, E., Hill, C., Quesnel-Vallières, M., Zucco, A. J., Barash, Y., & Gardini, A.
- Affiliations
- The Wistar Institute (US)
- University of Pennsylvania (US)
- Corresponding author
- Gardini, Alessandro
- Venue
- Cell Reports
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2020-11
- Volume
- 33
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 108373
- ISSN
- 2211-1247 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC7702699
- OpenAlex
- W3098482443
- Cited by
- 33
- References
- 6
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 4
- FWCI
- 1.38
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Cell Reports (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- Funders
- American Cancer Society (RSG-18-157-01)
- G. Harold and Leila Y. Mathers Foundation (MF-1809-00172, T32-CA009171, P30-CA010815)
- National Institutes of Health (R01 HL141326)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Chromatin Dynamics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › RNA Research and Splicing
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cancer Research › Cancer-related molecular mechanisms research
- Keywords
- RNA polymerase II processivity, transcriptional regulation, enhancer RNA, single-cell RNA sequencing
- MeSH terms
- Humans, Transcription, Genetic, Sequence Analysis, RNA, Gene Expression Profiling
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review