Cited by 369Genomics and Chromatin DynamicsRNA Research and SplicingCancer-related molecular mechanisms research

Native Elongating Transcript Sequencing Reveals Human Transcriptional Activity at Nucleotide Resolution

Open access
Mayer, Andreas, di Iulio, Julia, Maleri, Seth, Eser, Umut, Vierstra, Jeff, Reynolds, Alex, Sandstrom, Richard, Stamatoyannopoulos, John A. +1 more·2015·Cell

Abstract

Major features of transcription by human RNA polymerase II (Pol II) remain poorly defined due to a lack of quantitative approaches for visualizing Pol II progress at nucleotide resolution. We developed a simple and powerful approach for performing native elongating transcript sequencing (NET-seq) in human cells that globally maps strand-specific Pol II density at nucleotide resolution. NET-seq exposes a mode of antisense transcription that originates downstream and converges on transcription from the canonical promoter. Convergent transcription is associated with a distinctive chromatin configuration and is characteristic of lower-expressed genes. Integration of NET-seq with genomic footprinting data reveals stereotypic Pol II pausing coincident with transcription factor occupancy. Finally, exons retained in mature transcripts display Pol II pausing signatures that differ markedly from skipped exons, indicating an intrinsic capacity for Pol II to recognize exons with different processing fates. Together, human NET-seq exposes the topography and regulatory complexity of human gene expression.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.cell.2015.03.010

Cites

88 of 88 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In mammals and many other metazoans, promoter-proximal pausing occurs 25-50 base pairs downstream from the TSS and is a major rate-limiting step of the transcription cycle.

    “In mammals and many other metazoans, promoter‐proximal pausing occurs 25–50 base pairs downstream from the TSS and is a major rate‐limiting step of the transcription cycle (Jonkers et al, 2014; Mayer et al, 2015).”

    From RNA polymerase II speed: a key player in controlling and adapting transcriptome composition (2021) · cites this paper as Mayer et al, 2015

    The Introduction reports strong promoter-proximal pauses about 50 bp downstream of many transcription start sites. The Results describe release of paused Pol II as important for productive elongation, but the paper does not establish that pausing is a major rate-limiting step of the transcription cycle across mammals and other metazoans, or specify a 25–50 bp range. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • PRO-seq and NET-seq confirmed a pause at the 3′ splice site in budding yeast and Drosophila, at the 3′ and 5′ splice sites in human cells, and at the 5′ splice site in plants.

    “These methods also confirmed the existence of a pause at the 3′ splice site in budding yeast (Harlen et al, 2016) and Drosophila (Kwak et al, 2013), at the 3′ and 5′ splice sites in human cells (Mayer et al, 2015; Nojima et al, 2015) and at the 5′ splice site in plants (Kindgren et al, 2020).”
  • Higher RNA Pol II accumulation has been reported at spliced exons, as compared to skipped exons.

    “Moreover, higher RNA Pol II accumulation has been reported at spliced exons, as compared to skipped exons (Kwak et al, 2013; Mayer et al, 2015; Nojima et al, 2015).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Mayer, A., di Iulio, J., Maleri, S., Eser, U., Vierstra, J., Reynolds, A., Sandstrom, R., Stamatoyannopoulos, J. A., & Churchman, L. S.
Affiliations
  • Harvard University (US)
  • University of Washington (US)
Corresponding author
Churchman, L. Stirling
Venue
Cell
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2015-04
Volume
161
Issue
3
Pages
541-554
ISSN
0092-8674 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2037429489
Cited by
367
References
86
Citations by year
2026: 15 · 2025: 19 · 2024: 24 · 2023: 30 · 2022: 37 · 2021: 40 · 2020: 36 · 2019: 39 · 2018: 32 · 2017: 39 · 2016: 38 · 2015: 16
FWCI
18.10
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Cell (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Human Genome Research Institute (U54HG007010, R01HG007173)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Chromatin Dynamics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › RNA Research and Splicing
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cancer Research › Cancer-related molecular mechanisms research
Keywords
RNA polymerase II, transcription elongation, antisense transcription, convergent transcription, transcription factor occupancy, genomic footprinting, exon skipping
MeSH terms
Enhancer Elements, Genetic, Exons, HeLa Cells, Humans, Promoter Regions, Genetic, RNA Polymerase II, Transcription Factors, Transcription, Genetic, RNA, Antisense, Alternative Splicing, Sequence Analysis, RNA, Transcription Elongation, Genetic

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review