Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 161

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 11 of the 11 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Rational identification of potent and broad sarbecovirus-neutralizing antibody cocktails from SARS convalescents

Open access
Cao, Yunlong, Jian, Fanchong, Zhang, Zhiying, Yisimayi, Ayijiang, Hao, Xiaohua, Bao, Linlin, Yuan, Fei, Yu, Yuanling, Du, Shuo, Wang, Jing, Xiao, Tianhe, Song, Weiliang, Zhang, Ying, Liu, Pulan, An, Ran, Wang, Peng, Wang, Yao, Yang, Sijie, Niu, Xiao, Zhang, Yuhang, Gu, Qingqing, Shao, Fei, Hu, Yaling, Yin, Weidong, Zheng, Aihua, Wang, Youchun, Qin, Chuan, Jin, Ronghua, Xiao, Junyu, Xie, Xiaoliang Sunney·2022·Cell Reports

Abstract

Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) Omicron sublineages have escaped most receptor-binding domain (RBD)-targeting therapeutic neutralizing antibodies (NAbs), which proves that previous NAb drug screening strategies are deficient against the fast-evolving SARS-CoV-2. Better broad NAb drug candidate selection methods are needed. Here, we describe a rational approach for identifying RBD-targeting broad SARS-CoV-2 NAb cocktails. Based on high-throughput epitope determination, we propose that broad NAb drugs should target non-immunodominant RBD epitopes to avoid herd-immunity-directed escape mutations. Also, their interacting antigen residues should focus on sarbecovirus conserved sites and associate with critical viral functions, making the antibody-escaping mutations less likely to appear. Following these criteria, a featured non-competing antibody cocktail, SA55+SA58, is identified from a large collection of broad sarbecovirus NAbs isolated from SARS-CoV-2-vaccinated SARS convalescents. SA55+SA58 potently neutralizes ACE2-utilizing sarbecoviruses, including circulating Omicron variants, and could serve as broad SARS-CoV-2 prophylactics to offer long-term protection, especially for individuals who are immunocompromised or with high-risk comorbidities.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.celrep.2022.111845

Cites

11 of 11 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 11 references

Cited by

See all 161

Metadata

Authors
Cao, Y., Jian, F., Zhang, Z., Yisimayi, A., Hao, X., Bao, L., Yuan, F., Yu, Y., Du, S., Wang, J., Xiao, T., Song, W., Zhang, Y., Liu, P., An, R., Wang, P., Wang, Y., Yang, S., Niu, X., Zhang, Y., Gu, Q., Shao, F., Hu, Y., Yin, W., Zheng, A., Wang, Y., Qin, C., Jin, R., Xiao, J., & Xie, X. S.
Venue
Cell Reports
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2022-12
Volume
41
Issue
12
Pages
111845
ISSN
2211-1247 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4312210144
Cited by
161
References
11
FWCI
14.40
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
gold

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Rational identification of potent and broad sarbecovirus-neutralizing antibody cocktails from SARS convalescents. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.celrep.2022.111845
The paper
Cao, Y., Jian, F., Zhang, Z., Yisimayi, A., Hao, X., Bao, L., Yuan, F., Yu, Y., Du, S., Wang, J., Xiao, T., Song, W., Zhang, Y., Liu, P., An, R., Wang, P., Wang, Y., Yang, S., Niu, X., . . . Xie, X. S. (2022). Rational identification of potent and broad sarbecovirus-neutralizing antibody cocktails from SARS convalescents. Cell Reports. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.celrep.2022.111845

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.