Cited by 23SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 Researchvaccines and immunoinformatics approachesAnimal Virus Infections Studies

A broadly generalizable stabilization strategy for sarbecovirus fusion machinery vaccines

Open access
Lee, Jimin, Stewart, Cameron, Schäfer, Alexandra, Leaf, Elizabeth M., Park, Young-Jun, Asarnow, Daniel, Powers, John M., Treichel, Catherine +5 more·2024·Nature Communications

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Evolution of SARS-CoV-2 alters the antigenicity of the immunodominant spike (S) receptor-binding domain and N-terminal domain, undermining the efficacy of vaccines and antibody therapies. To overcome this challenge, we set out to develop a vaccine focusing antibody responses on the highly conserved but metastable S 2 subunit, which folds as a spring-loaded fusion machinery. We describe a strategy for prefusion-stabilization and high yield recombinant production of SARS-CoV-2 S 2 trimers with native structure and antigenicity. We demonstrate that our design strategy is broadly generalizable to sarbecoviruses, as exemplified with the SARS-CoV-1 (clade 1a) and PRD-0038 (clade 3) S 2 subunits. Immunization of mice with a prefusion-stabilized SARS-CoV-2 S 2 trimer elicits broadly reactive sarbecovirus antibodies and neutralizing antibody titers of comparable magnitude against Wuhan-Hu-1 and the immune evasive XBB.1.5 variant. Vaccinated mice were protected from weight loss and disease upon challenge with XBB.1.5, providing proof-of-principle for fusion machinery sarbecovirus vaccines.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41467-024-49656-5

Cites

10 of 10 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Authors
Lee, J., Stewart, C., Schäfer, A., Leaf, E. M., Park, Y.-J., Asarnow, D., Powers, J. M., Treichel, C., Sprouse, K. R., Corti, D., Baric, R., King, N. P., & Veesler, D.
Affiliations
  • University of Washington (US)
  • University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US)
  • Howard Hughes Medical Institute (US)
  • Vir Biotechnology (Switzerland) (CH)
Corresponding author
Veesler, David
Venue
Nature Communications
Published
2024-06-28
Volume
15
Issue
1
Pages
5496-5496
ISSN
2041-1723 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4400146025
Cited by
23
References
10
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 3
FWCI
7.90
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nature Communications (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
Howard Hughes Medical Institute
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 Research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › vaccines and immunoinformatics approaches
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Animal Science and Zoology › Animal Virus Infections Studies
Keywords
SARS-CoV-2, recombinant protein expression, SARS-CoV-1, XBB.1.5 variant, neutralizing antibodies, broadly reactive antibodies, antigenic drift
MeSH terms
COVID-19, SARS-CoV-2, COVID-19 Vaccines, Animals, Antibodies, Viral, Female, Humans, Mice, Inbred BALB C, Mice, Antibodies, Neutralizing, Spike Glycoprotein, Coronavirus

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review