Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 253

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 57 of the 57 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Repeated Omicron exposures override ancestral SARS-CoV-2 immune imprinting

Open access
Yisimayi, Ayijiang, Song, Weiliang, Wang, Jing, Jian, Fanchong, Yu, Yuanling, Chen, Xiaosu, Xu, Yanli, Yang, Sijie, Niu, Xiao, Xiao, Tianhe, Wang, Jing, Zhao, Lijuan, Sun, Haiyan, An, Ran, Zhang, Na, Wang, Yao, Wang, Peng, Yu, Lingling, Lv, Zhe, Gu, Qingqing, Shao, Fei, Jin, Ronghua, Shen, Zhongyang, Xie, Xiaoliang Sunney, Wang, Youchun, Cao, Yunlong·2024·Nature

Abstract

The continuing emergence of SARS-CoV-2 variants highlights the need to update COVID-19 vaccine compositions. However, immune imprinting induced by vaccination based on the ancestral (hereafter referred to as WT) strain would compromise the antibody response to Omicron-based boosters 1–5 . Vaccination strategies to counter immune imprinting are critically needed. Here we investigated the degree and dynamics of immune imprinting in mouse models and human cohorts, especially focusing on the role of repeated Omicron stimulation. In mice, the efficacy of single Omicron boosting is heavily limited when using variants that are antigenically distinct from WT—such as the XBB variant—and this concerning situation could be mitigated by a second Omicron booster. Similarly, in humans, repeated Omicron infections could alleviate WT vaccination-induced immune imprinting and generate broad neutralization responses in both plasma and nasal mucosa. Notably, deep mutational scanning-based epitope characterization of 781 receptor-binding domain (RBD)-targeting monoclonal antibodies isolated from repeated Omicron infection revealed that double Omicron exposure could induce a large proportion of matured Omicron-specific antibodies that have distinct RBD epitopes to WT-induced antibodies. Consequently, immune imprinting was largely mitigated, and the bias towards non-neutralizing epitopes observed in single Omicron exposures was restored. On the basis of the deep mutational scanning profiles, we identified evolution hotspots of XBB.1.5 RBD and demonstrated that these mutations could further boost the immune-evasion capability of XBB.1.5 while maintaining high ACE2-binding affinity. Our findings suggest that the WT component should be abandoned when updating COVID-19 vaccines, and individuals without prior Omicron exposure should receive two updated vaccine boosters.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41586-023-06753-7

Cites

57 of 57 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 57 references

Cited by

See all 253

Metadata

Authors
Yisimayi, A., Song, W., Wang, J., Jian, F., Yu, Y., Chen, X., Xu, Y., Yang, S., Niu, X., Xiao, T., Wang, J., Zhao, L., Sun, H., An, R., Zhang, N., Wang, Y., Wang, P., Yu, L., Lv, Z., Gu, Q., Shao, F., Jin, R., Shen, Z., Xie, X. S., Wang, Y., & Cao, Y.
Venue
Nature
Published
2023-11-22
Volume
625
Issue
7993
Pages
148-156
ISSN
  • 0028-0836 (ISSN-L)
  • 1476-4687
OpenAlex
W4388897344
Cited by
253
References
57
FWCI
47.42
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
hybrid

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Repeated Omicron exposures override ancestral SARS-CoV-2 immune imprinting. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1038/s41586-023-06753-7
The paper
Yisimayi, A., Song, W., Wang, J., Jian, F., Yu, Y., Chen, X., Xu, Y., Yang, S., Niu, X., Xiao, T., Wang, J., Zhao, L., Sun, H., An, R., Zhang, N., Wang, Y., Wang, P., Yu, L., Lv, Z., . . . Cao, Y. (2024). Repeated Omicron exposures override ancestral SARS-CoV-2 immune imprinting. Nature. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-023-06753-7

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.