Cited by 16Zebrafish Biomedical Research ApplicationsNeuroscience and Neuropharmacology ResearchNeurological disorders and treatments

Transgenic tools targeting the basal ganglia reveal both evolutionary conservation and specialization of neural circuits in zebrafish

Open access
Tanimoto, Yuki, Kakinuma, Hisaya, Aoki, Ryo, Shiraki, Toshiyuki, Higashijima, Shin-ichi, Okamoto, Hitoshi·2024·Cell Reports

Abstract

The cortico-basal ganglia circuit mediates decision making. Here, we generated transgenic tools for adult zebrafish targeting specific subpopulations of the components of this circuit and utilized them to identify evolutionary homologs of the mammalian direct- and indirect-pathway striatal neurons, which respectively project to the homologs of the internal and external segment of the globus pallidus (dorsal entopeduncular nucleus [dEN] and lateral nucleus of the ventral telencephalic area [Vl]) as in mammals. Unlike in mammals, the Vl mainly projects to the dEN directly, not by way of the subthalamic nucleus. Further single-cell RNA sequencing analysis reveals two pallidal output pathways: a major shortcut pathway directly connecting the dEN with the pallium and the evolutionarily conserved closed loop by way of the thalamus. Our resources and circuit map provide the common basis for the functional study of the basal ganglia in a small and optically tractable zebrafish brain for the comprehensive mechanistic understanding of the cortico-basal ganglia circuit.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.celrep.2024.113916

Cites

8 of 8 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The telencephalon contains putative analogues to components of the mammalian limbic system (for example, hippocampus).

    “a brain region that contains putative analogues to components of the mammalian limbic system (for example, hippocampus)2–4”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Tanimoto, Y., Kakinuma, H., Aoki, R., Shiraki, T., Higashijima, S.-I., & Okamoto, H.
Affiliations
  • RIKEN Center for Brain Science (JP)
  • National Institute for Basic Biology (JP)
Corresponding author
Okamoto, Hitoshi
Venue
Cell Reports
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2024-03
Volume
43
Issue
3
Pages
113916
ISSN
2211-1247 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4392740371
Cited by
16
References
8
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 2
FWCI
3.61
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Cell Reports (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Japan Society for the Promotion of Science
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cell Biology › Zebrafish Biomedical Research Applications
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Neurological disorders and treatments
Keywords
cortico-basal ganglia circuits, basal ganglia, zebrafish, globus pallidus, thalamus, evolutionary conservation, neural circuit mapping, decision-making
MeSH terms
Animals, Basal Ganglia, Corpus Striatum, Globus Pallidus, Mammals, Neural Pathways, Zebrafish, Animals, Genetically Modified

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review