Cited by 241Bioinformatics and Genomic NetworksGene Regulatory Network AnalysisBiomedical Text Mining and Ontologies

Compact integration of multi-network topology for functional analysis of genes

Open access
Cho, Hyunghoon, Berger, Bonnie, Peng, Jian·2016·Cell Systems

Abstract

The topological landscape of molecular or functional interaction networks provides a rich source of information for inferring functional patterns of genes or proteins. However, a pressing yet-unsolved challenge is how to combine multiple heterogeneous networks, each having different connectivity patterns, to achieve more accurate inference. Here, we describe the Mashup framework for scalable and robust network integration. In Mashup, the diffusion in each network is first analyzed to characterize the topological context of each node. Next, the high-dimensional topological patterns in individual networks are canonically represented using low-dimensional vectors, one per gene or protein. These vectors can then be plugged into off-the-shelf machine learning methods to derive functional insights about genes or proteins. We present tools based on Mashup that achieve state-of-the-art performance in three diverse functional inference tasks: protein function prediction, gene ontology reconstruction, and genetic interaction prediction. Mashup enables deeper insights into the structure of rapidly accumulating and diverse biological network data and can be broadly applied to other network science domains.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.cels.2016.10.017

Cites

68 of 68 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The Mashup algorithm analyzes the topology of each network separately and learns a single weighted network representation that best explains the topological patterns observed across all networks.

    “In a related method, the Mashup algorithm analyzes the topology of each network separately and learns a single weighted network representation that best explains the topological patterns observed across all networks (Cho et al., 2016).”

    From Mapping the multiscale structure of biological systems (2021) · cites this paper as Cho et al., 2016

  • The NeXO and Mashup efforts found that the majority of cellular components catalogued in GO could be recovered from hierarchical detection of communities in protein network data.

    “For instance, the multiscale models of cellular components constructed by the NeXO and Mashup efforts (see above) found that the majority of cellular components catalogued in GO could be recovered from hierarchical detection of communities in protein network data (Cho et al., 2016; Dutkowski et al., 2013).”

    From Mapping the multiscale structure of biological systems (2021) · cites this paper as Cho et al., 2016

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Cho, H., Berger, B., & Peng, J.
Affiliations
  • MIT Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence Laboratory (US)
  • University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign (US)
Corresponding author
  • Berger, Bonnie
  • Peng, Jian
Venue
Cell Systems
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2016-12
Volume
3
Issue
6
Pages
540-548.e5
ISSN
2405-4712 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2556519015
Cited by
241
References
68
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 21 · 2024: 22 · 2023: 24 · 2022: 37 · 2021: 40 · 2020: 29 · 2019: 30 · 2018: 19 · 2017: 9
FWCI
10.05
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Cell Systems (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • DSpace@MIT (Massachusetts Institute of Technology) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Funders
NIH (R01GM081871)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Bioinformatics and Genomic Networks
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Gene Regulatory Network Analysis
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Biomedical Text Mining and Ontologies
Keywords
network integration, heterogeneous biological networks, diffusion analysis, topological patterns, low-dimensional embedding, protein function prediction

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review