Cited by 164Genomics and Chromatin DynamicsEpigenetics and DNA MethylationScientific Computing and Data Management

The BLUEPRINT Data Analysis Portal

Open access
Fernández, José María, de la Torre, Victor, Richardson, David, Royo, Romina, Puiggròs, Montserrat, Moncunill, Valentí, Fragkogianni, Stamatina, Clarke, Laura +5 more·2016·Cell Systems

Abstract

The impact of large and complex epigenomic datasets on biological insights or clinical applications is limited by the lack of accessibility by easy, intuitive, and fast tools. Here, we describe an epigenomics comparative cyber-infrastructure (EPICO), an open-access reference set of libraries to develop comparative epigenomic data portals. Using EPICO, large epigenome projects can make available their rich datasets to the community without requiring specific technical skills. As a first instance of EPICO, we implemented the BLUEPRINT Data Analysis Portal (BDAP). BDAP provides a desktop for the comparative analysis of epigenomes of hematopoietic cell types based on results, such as the position of epigenetic features, from basic analysis pipelines. The BDAP interface facilitates interactive exploration of genomic regions, genes, and pathways in the context of differentiation of hematopoietic lineages. This work represents initial steps toward broadly accessible integrative analysis of epigenomic data across international consortia. EPICO can be accessed at https://github.com/inab, and BDAP can be accessed at http://blueprint-data.bsc.es.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.cels.2016.10.021

Cites

22 of 22 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Large-scale annotation projects such as the Roadmap Epigenomics Project, the Blueprint Project, and PsychENCODE aim to generate, and make publicly available, high-quality reference annotation maps across a wide variety of human cell and tissue types.

    “This search has been facilitated by large-scale annotation projects such as the Roadmap Epigenomics Project [180], the Blueprint Project [181], and PsychENCODE [182]. These projects aim to generate, and make publicly available, high-quality reference annotation maps across a wide variety of human cell and tissue types.”

    From Genetic architecture of Alzheimer's disease (2020) · cites this paper as [181]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Fernández, J. M., de la Torre, V., Richardson, D., Royo, R., Puiggròs, M., Moncunill, V., Fragkogianni, S., Clarke, L., Flicek, P., Rico, D., Torrents, D., Carrillo de Santa Pau, E., & Valencia, A.
Affiliations
  • Instituto de Salud Carlos III (ES)
  • European Bioinformatics Institute (GB)
  • Barcelona Supercomputing Center (ES)
  • Spanish National Cancer Research Centre (ES)
  • Institució Catalana de Recerca i Estudis Avançats (ES)
Corresponding author
Valencia, Alfonso
Venue
Cell Systems
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2016-11
Volume
3
Issue
5
Pages
491-495.e5
ISSN
2405-4712 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2549343567
Cited by
151
References
22
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 21 · 2022: 23 · 2021: 20 · 2020: 19 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 1
FWCI
6.41
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Cell Systems (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • Newcastle University ePrints (Newcastle Univesity) (cc-by)
Funders
  • ISCIII (PT13/0001)
  • FEDER
  • Spanish Ministry of Health, ISCIII (PRB2: PT13/0001/0028)
  • European Union’s Seventh Framework Programme (FP7/2007-2013)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Chromatin Dynamics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Epigenetics and DNA Methylation
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Scientific Computing and Data Management
Keywords
epigenomics, hematopoietic differentiation, epigenetic features
MeSH terms
Cell Differentiation, Software, User-Computer Interface, Genome, Internet, Epigenesis, Genetic, Epigenomics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review