Cited by 130Single-cell and spatial transcriptomicsGene expression and cancer classificationGenomics and Phylogenetic Studies

scMatch: a single-cell gene expression profile annotation tool using reference datasets

Open access
Hou, Rui, Denisenko, Elena, Forrest, Alistair R R·2019·Bioinformatics

Abstract

MOTIVATION: Single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq) measures gene expression at the resolution of individual cells. Massively multiplexed single-cell profiling has enabled large-scale transcriptional analyses of thousands of cells in complex tissues. In most cases, the true identity of individual cells is unknown and needs to be inferred from the transcriptomic data. Existing methods typically cluster (group) cells based on similarities of their gene expression profiles and assign the same identity to all cells within each cluster using the averaged expression levels. However, scRNA-seq experiments typically produce low-coverage sequencing data for each cell, which hinders the clustering process. RESULTS: We introduce scMatch, which directly annotates single cells by identifying their closest match in large reference datasets. We used this strategy to annotate various single-cell datasets and evaluated the impacts of sequencing depth, similarity metric and reference datasets. We found that scMatch can rapidly and robustly annotate single cells with comparable accuracy to another recent cell annotation tool (SingleR), but that it is quicker and can handle larger reference datasets. We demonstrate how scMatch can handle large customized reference gene expression profiles that combine data from multiple sources, thus empowering researchers to identify cell populations in any complex tissue with the desired precision. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: scMatch (Python code) and the FANTOM5 reference dataset are freely available to the research community here https://github.com/forrest-lab/scMatch. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/bioinformatics/btz292

Cites

37 of 37 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Hierarchies of cell communities inferred from single-cell RNA sequencing data are typically compared to the Cell Ontology to determine which communities correspond to known versus novel cell types.

    “Likewise, hierarchies of cell communities inferred from single-cell RNA seq data are typically compared to the CL to determine which communities correspond to known versus novel cell types (Bernstein et al., 2021; Hou et al., 2019).”

    From Mapping the multiscale structure of biological systems (2021) · cites this paper as Hou et al., 2019

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hou, R., Denisenko, E., & Forrest, A. R. R.
Affiliations
The University of Western Australia (AU)
Corresponding author
Forrest, Alistair R R
Venue
Bioinformatics
Published
2019-04-26
Volume
35
Issue
22
Pages
4688-4695
ISSN
  • 1367-4803 (ISSN-L)
  • 1367-4811
OpenAlex
W2942380588
Cited by
130
References
37
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 16 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 21 · 2021: 36 · 2020: 17 · 2019: 5
FWCI
7.28
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Bioinformatics (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UWA Profiles and Research Repository (UWA) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • Cancer Research Trust ‘Enabling
  • Cancer Council of Western Australia
  • Australian Government Research Training Programme
  • Cancer Research Trust
  • Australian National Health and Medical Research Council Fellowship (APP1154524)
  • Australian Government and the Government of Western Australia
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Single-cell and spatial transcriptomics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Gene expression and cancer classification
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies
Keywords
single-cell RNA sequencing, cell type annotation, similarity measures, sequencing depth, FANTOM5, cell population identification
MeSH terms
Algorithms, Software, Gene Expression Profiling, Single-Cell Analysis, Transcriptome

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review