Protein surface chemistry encodes an adaptive tolerance to desiccation
Open accessPublished version of a preprint
Abstract
Cellular desiccation-the loss of nearly all water from the cell-is a recurring stress that drives widespread protein dysfunction. To survive, part of the proteome must resume function upon rehydration. Which proteins tolerate desiccation, and the molecular determinants that underlie this tolerance, are largely unknown. Here, we use quantitative mass spectrometry and structural proteomics to show that certain proteins possess an innate capacity to tolerate extreme water loss. Structural analyses point to protein surface chemistry as a key determinant of desiccation tolerance, which we test by showing that rational surface mutants can convert a desiccation-sensitive protein into a tolerant one. We also find that highly tolerant proteins are responsible for the production of small-molecule building blocks, while intolerant proteins are involved in energy-consuming processes such as ribosome biogenesis. We propose that this functional bias enables cells to kickstart their metabolism and promote cell survival following desiccation and rehydration. A record of this paper's transparent peer review process is included in the supplemental information.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Highly accurate protein structure prediction with AlphaFold
Jumper, J., Evans, R., Pritzel, A., Green, T., Figurnov, M., Ronneberger, O., Tunyasuvunakool, K., Bates, R., Žídek, A., Potapenko, A., et al. (2021) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-021-03819-2 · Cited by 43,764 · see citing works
Highly accurate protein structure prediction for the human proteome
Tunyasuvunakool, K., Adler, J., Wu, Z., Green, T., Zielinski, M., Žídek, A., Bridgland, A., Cowie, A., Meyer, C., Laydon, A., et al. (2021) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-021-03828-1 · Cited by 3,025 · see citing works
Interdependence of Cell Growth and Gene Expression: Origins and Consequences
Scott, M., Gunderson, C. W., Mateescu, E. M., Zhang, Z., & Hwa, T. (2010) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1192588 · Cited by 1,470 · see citing works
ECOD: an evolutionary classification of protein domains
Cheng, H., Schaeffer, R. D., Liao, Y., Kinch, L. N., Pei, J., Shi, S., Kim, B.-H., & Grishin, N. V. (2014) · PLoS Computational Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003926 · Cited by 426 · see citing works
Widespread aggregation and neurodegenerative diseases are associated with supersaturated proteins
Ciryam, P., Tartaglia, G. G., Morimoto, R. I., Dobson, C. M., & Vendruscolo, M. (2013) · Cell Reports · doi:10.1016/j.celrep.2013.09.043 · Cited by 270 · see citing works
Chainsaw: protein domain segmentation with fully convolutional neural networks
Wells, J., Hawkins-Hooker, A., Bordin, N., Sillitoe, I., Paige, B., & Orengo, C. (2023) · doi:10.1101/2023.07.19.549732 · Cited by 53 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
- Authors
- Romero-Pérez, P. S., Moran, H. M., Cordone, D. P., Horani, A., Truong, A., Manriquez-Sandoval, E., Ramirez, J. F., Martinez, A., Gollub, E., Hunter, K., Kolamunna, K. C., Lotthammer, J. M., Emenecker, R. J., Liu, H., Iwasa, J. H., Boothby, T. C., Holehouse, A. S., Fried, S. D., & Sukenik, S.
- Affiliations
- Johns Hopkins University (US)
- Syracuse University (US)
- University of California, Merced (US)
- University of Wyoming (US)
- Washington University in St. Louis (US)
- University of Utah (US)
- Corresponding author
- Holehouse, Alex S.
- Fried, Stephen D.
- Sukenik, Shahar
- ORCID
- Venue
- Cell Systems
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2025-10
- Volume
- 16
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 101407
- ISSN
- 2405-4712 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC11312438
- OpenAlex
- W4414805570
- Cited by
- 9
- References
- 6
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 4
- FWCI
- 2.71
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- doi.org
- Licence
- cc-by-nc-nd
- www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)
- www.elsevier.com/legal/tdmrep-license (tdm)
- www.elsevier.com/open-access/userlicense/1.0/ (am, 379 d)
- doi.org/10.15223/policy-017 (stm-asf)
- doi.org/10.15223/policy-037 (stm-asf)
- doi.org/10.15223/policy-012 (stm-asf)
- doi.org/10.15223/policy-029 (stm-asf)
- doi.org/10.15223/policy-004 (stm-asf)
- Locations
- Cell Systems (publishedVersion)
- bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- SSRN Electronic Journal (acceptedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- Funders
- Alfred P. Sloan Foundation
- National Science Foundation (2128067, DGE-2139839, 2128069, 2128068)
- Human Frontier Science Program (RGP0015/2022)
- Division of Biological Infrastructure (2213983, 62937, 1817845, 62936, 89249, 89247, 89252, 89248)
- National Institutes of Health (T32GM135131)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Structure and Dynamics
- Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Spectroscopy › Advanced Proteomics Techniques and Applications
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Tardigrade Biology and Ecology
- Keywords
- desiccation tolerance, rehydration, protein stability, ribosome biogenesis
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review