The DOI matches its Crossref record; the references it cites are not checked yet.
Electric field assisted membrane separation for oily wastewater with a novel and cost-effective electrocoagulation and electroflotation enhanced membrane module (ECEFMM)
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Hybridization between EF, membrane, and EC was a promising approach to improve the overall system performance to remove heavy metals.
“Therefore, hybridization between EF, membrane, and EC was a promising approach to improve the overall system performance to remove heavy metals 110 .”
From Removal of heavy metal ions from wastewater: a comprehensive and critical review (2021) · cites this paper as [110]
Electrocoagulation is expensive compared to other approaches due to infrastructure, energy, and other operational costs.
“Hence, despite the promise of nearly complete removal in relatively short periods of time, electrocoagulation is expensive compared to other approaches due to infrastructure, energy, and other operational costs [204].”
From Chromium Remediation from Tannery Wastewater in Arequipa, Peru: Local Experiences and Prospects for Sustainable Solutions (2025) · cites this paper as [204]
Citations
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 31 · Cited by 32
Research works printed but not linked: 2
- Ludwig, 2015, Flotation-filtration-process with ceramic membranes for water treatment, in Highlights 2014, F.S. Int. Ed., 27
- Murakawa, 1957, Points on the electrode surface where gas bubbles are most frequently formed during electrolysis, J. Electrochem. Soc. Japan., 25, E-61
Metadata
- Authors
- Mazumder, A., Chowdhury, Z., Sen, D., & Bhattacharjee, C.
- Affiliations
- Jadavpur University (IN)
- Heritage Institute of Technology (IN)
- Corresponding author
- Sen, Dwaipayan
- Venue
- Chemical Engineering and Processing - Process Intensification
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2020-05
- Volume
- 151
- Pages
- 107918
- ISSN
- 0255-2701 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3018833069
- Cited by
- 32
- References
- 31
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 2
- FWCI
- 1.38
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Chemical Engineering and Processing - Process Intensification (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Department of Science and Technology, Ministry of Science and Technology, India
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Water Science and Technology › Membrane Separation Technologies
- Physical Sciences › Chemical Engineering › Filtration and Separation › Minerals Flotation and Separation Techniques
- Physical Sciences › Chemical Engineering › Filtration and Separation › Membrane-based Ion Separation Techniques
- Keywords
- electrocoagulation, electroflotation, membrane fouling, oily wastewater, emulsified oil, polyethersulfone membranes, polysulfone membranes, oil rejection, permeate flux decline, hydrophilicity
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review