Cited by 21Ultrasound and Cavitation PhenomenaEdible Oils Quality and AnalysisAgricultural Engineering and Mechanization

Does the ultrasonic field improve the extraction productivity compared to classical methods-Maceration and reflux distillation?

Oprescu, Elena-Emilia, Enascuta, Cristina-Emanuela, Radu, Elena, Ciltea-Udrescu, Mihaela, Lavric, Vasile·2022·Chemical Engineering and Processing - Process Intensification

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.cep.2022.109082

Cites

24 of 24 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Oprescu et al. found that UAE extraction of rapeseed oil achieved an extraction rate of 19.2 ± 0.04 in 5 min, increasing to 21.36 ± 0.04 after 30 min, while reflux and impregnation methods yielded 21.32 ± 0.05 and 20.44 ± 0.05 after 30 min.

    “The findings revealed that the UAE method achieved an extraction rate of 19.2 ± 0.04 within a remarkably short period of 5 min. The rate of increase then gradually slowed to reach an extraction rate of 21.36 ± 0.04 after 30 min. In comparison, the reflux extraction and impregnation methods yielded extraction rates of 21.32 ± 0.05 and 20.44 ± 0.05 respectively after 30 min.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 25 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Oprescu, E.-E., Enascuta, C.-E., Radu, E., Ciltea-Udrescu, M., & Lavric, V.
Affiliations
  • Petroleum & Gas University of Ploieşti (RO)
  • Institutul Naţional de Cercetare Dezvoltare pentru Chimie si Petrochimie (RO)
Corresponding author
Lavric, Vasile
Venue
Chemical Engineering and Processing - Process Intensification
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2022-09
Volume
179
Pages
109082
ISSN
0255-2701 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4289527699
Cited by
20
References
25
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 1
FWCI
1.34
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Chemical Engineering and Processing - Process Intensification (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Corporation for National and Community Service
  • Unitatea Executiva pentru Finantarea Invatamantului Superior, a Cercetarii, Dezvoltarii si Inovarii (PN-III-P1-1.1-PD-2019-0877, PN-III-P1-1.1-TE-2019-1842)
  • Ministry of Education and Research, Romania
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Ultrasound and Cavitation Phenomena
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Organic Chemistry › Edible Oils Quality and Analysis
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Agricultural Engineering and Mechanization
Keywords
ultrasound-assisted extraction, rapeseed oil, maceration, extraction yield, specific energy consumption, ultrasound intensity, extraction time, energy productivity, process intensification, oil extraction

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review