Cited by 37Bone Tissue Engineering MaterialsSurface Treatment and CoatingsPolymer Surface Interaction Studies

Ultrafast bone-like apatite formation on bioactive tricalcium silicate cement using mussel-inspired polydopamine

Wu, Meng, Wang, Tao, Wang, Yangyang, Wang, Hui·2019·Ceramics International

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ceramint.2018.10.149

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wu, M., Wang, T., Wang, Y., & Wang, H.
Affiliations
Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics (CN)
Corresponding author
Wang, Tao
Venue
Ceramics International
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2019-02
Volume
45
Issue
3
Pages
3033-3043
ISSN
0272-8842 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2896858750
Cited by
37
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 2
FWCI
1.30
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Ceramics International (publishedVersion)
Funders
Priority Academic Program Development of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Bone Tissue Engineering Materials
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Surface Treatment and Coatings
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Surfaces, Coatings and Films › Polymer Surface Interaction Studies
Keywords
bone-like apatite formation, tricalcium silicate cement, polydopamine coating, amorphous calcium phosphate, carbonated hydroxyapatite, simulated body fluid, dip coating, implant-tissue interface, hard tissue repair, calcium adsorption

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review