Cited by 146Fluid Dynamics and MixingMinerals Flotation and Separation TechniquesGranular flow and fluidized beds

Detailed modelling of hydrodynamics, mass transfer and chemical reactions in a bubble column using a discrete bubble model: Chemisorption of CO 2 into NaOH solution, numerical and experimental study

Darmana, D., Henket, R.L.B., Deen, N.G., Kuipers, J.A.M.·2007·Chemical Engineering Science

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ces.2007.01.065

Cites

34 of 34 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Darmana et al. [254] found that their model reproduces qualitatively very well the entire process, but time-averaged velocities, plume meandering period, and gas hold-up only match well with experiments if mass transfer is neglected; if mass transfer is taken into account, the average bubble size computed numerically is higher than experimentally found, leading to higher gas hold-up, higher flow,

    “Although the model reproduces qualitatively very well the entire process, timeaveraged averaged velocities, plume meandering period, and gas hold-up only match well with experiments if mass transfer is neglected. If mass transfer is taken into account, the average bubble size computed numerically is higher compared to the one found experimentally, leading to a higher gas hold-up, higher flow”
  • Taborda and Sommerfeld [138] found that their numerical results are in reasonable agreement with the experimental data of [254] in terms of time averaged gas hold-up, equivalent bubble diameter, time averaged bubble velocity and decrease of pH with time.

    “The numerical results are in reasonable agreement with the experimental data of [254] in terms of time averaged gas hold-up, equivalent bubble diameter, time averaged bubble velocity and decrease of pH with time.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Darmana, D., Henket, R. L. B., Deen, N. G., & Kuipers, J. A. M.
Affiliations
University of Twente (NL)
Corresponding author
Deen, N.G.
Venue
Chemical Engineering Science
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2007-05
Volume
62
Issue
9
Pages
2556-2575
ISSN
0009-2509 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1986600499
Cited by
146
References
34
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 2
FWCI
2.63
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Chemical Engineering Science (publishedVersion)
  • University of Twente Research Information (publishedVersion)
  • TU/e Research Portal (submittedVersion)
  • University of Twente Research Information (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Shell
  • Technische Universiteit Delft
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Fluid Dynamics and Mixing
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Water Science and Technology › Minerals Flotation and Separation Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Computational Mechanics › Granular flow and fluidized beds
Keywords
bubble column, chemisorption, CO2 absorption, NaOH solution, Euler-Lagrange model, discrete bubble model, mass transfer, chemical reactions, bubble hydrodynamics, bubble size distribution, gas holdup, bubble velocity, particle image velocimetry

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review