Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 496

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Epidemiology of Eosinophilic Esophagitis Over Three Decades in Olmsted County, Minnesota

Open access
Prasad, Ganapathy A., Alexander, Jeffery A., Schleck, Cathy D., Zinsmeister, Alan R., Smyrk, Thomas C., Elias, Richard M., Locke, G. Richard, Talley, Nicholas J.·2009·Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology

Abstract

Background & Aims Data on secular trends and outcomes of eosinophilic esophagitis (EE) are scarce. We performed a population-based study to assess the epidemiology and outcomes of EE in Olmsted County, Minnesota, over the last 3 decades. Methods All cases of EE diagnosed between 1976 and 2005 were identified using the Rochester Epidemiology Project resources. Esophageal biopsies with any evidence of esophagitis and/or eosinophilic infiltration were reviewed by a single pathologist. Clinical course (treatment, response and recurrence) was defined using information collected from medical records and prospectively via a telephone questionnaire. Incidence rates per 100,000 person years were directly adjusted for age and sex to the US 2000 population structure. Results A total of 78 patients with EE were identified. The incidence of EE increased significantly over the last 3 of the 5-year intervals (from 0.35 [0,0.87]/100000 person-years during 1991–1995 to 9.45 [7.13, 11.77]/100000 person-years during 2001–2005). The prevalence of EE was 55.0 (42.7, 67.2)/100000 persons as of January 1, 2006 in Olmsted County, Minnesota. EE was diagnosed more frequently in late summer/fall. The clinical course of patients with EE was characterized by recurrent symptoms (observed in 41% of patients). Conclusions The prevalence and incidence of EE is higher than previously reported. The incidence of clinically diagnosed EE increased significantly over the last 3 decades, in parallel with endoscopy volume and seasonal incidence, and was greatest in late summer/fall. EE also appears to be a recurrent relapsing disease in a substantial proportion of patients.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.cgh.2009.06.023

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 3 references

Cited by

See all 496

Metadata

Authors
Prasad, G. A., Alexander, J. A., Schleck, C. D., Zinsmeister, A. R., Smyrk, T. C., Elias, R. M., Locke, G. R., & Talley, N. J.
Venue
Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2009-10
Volume
7
Issue
10
Pages
1055-1061
ISSN
1542-3565 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2044562596
Cited by
496
References
3
FWCI
31.06
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Epidemiology of Eosinophilic Esophagitis Over Three Decades in Olmsted County, Minnesota. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.cgh.2009.06.023
The paper
Prasad, G. A., Alexander, J. A., Schleck, C. D., Zinsmeister, A. R., Smyrk, T. C., Elias, R. M., Locke, G. R., & Talley, N. J. (2009). Epidemiology of Eosinophilic Esophagitis Over Three Decades in Olmsted County, Minnesota. Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cgh.2009.06.023

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.