Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 299

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 70 of the 70 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Twin and family studies reveal strong environmental and weaker genetic cues explaining heritability of eosinophilic esophagitis

Open access
Alexander, Eileen S., Martin, Lisa J., Collins, Margaret H., Kottyan, Leah C., Sucharew, Heidi, He, Hua, Mukkada, Vincent A., Succop, Paul A., Abonia, J. Pablo, Foote, Heather, Eby, Michael D., Grotjan, Tommie M., Greenler, Alexandria J., Dellon, Evan S., Demain, Jeffrey G., Furuta, Glenn T., Gurian, Larry E., Harley, John B., Hopp, Russell J., Kagalwalla, Amir, Kaul, Ajay, Nadeau, Kari C., Noel, Richard J., Putnam, Philip E., von Tiehl, Karl F., Rothenberg, Marc E.·2014·Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology

Abstract

Background Eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) is a chronic antigen-driven allergic inflammatory disease, likely involving the interplay of genetic and environmental factors, yet their respective contributions to heritability are unknown. Objective To quantify risk associated with genes and environment on familial clustering of EoE. Methods Family history was obtained from a hospital-based cohort of 914 EoE probands, (n=2192 first-degree “Nuclear-Family” relatives) and the new international registry of monozygotic and dizygotic twins/triplets (n=63 EoE “Twins” probands). Frequencies, recurrence risk ratios (RRRs), heritability and twin concordance were estimated. Environmental exposures were preliminarily examined. Results Analysis of the Nuclear-Family–based cohort revealed that the rate of EoE, in first-degree relatives of a proband, was 1.8% (unadjusted) and 2.3% (sex-adjusted). RRRs ranged from 10–64, depending on the family relationship, and were higher in brothers (64.0; p=0.04), fathers (42.9; p=0.004) and males (50.7; p<0.001) compared to sisters, mothers and females, respectively. Risk of EoE for other siblings was 2.4%. In the Nuclear-Families, combined gene and common environment heritability (hgc2) was 72.0±2.7% (p<0.001). In the Twins cohort, genetic heritability was 14.5±4.0% (p<0.001), and common family environment contributed 81.0±4% (p<0.001) to phenotypic variance. Proband-wise concordance in MZ co-twins was 57.9±9.5% compared to 36.4±9.3% in DZ (p=0.11). Greater birth-weight difference between twins (p=0.01), breastfeeding (p=0.15) and Fall birth season (p=0.02) were associated with twin discordance in disease status. Conclusions EoE recurrence risk ratios are increased 10–64-fold compared with the general population. EoE in relatives is 1.8–2.4%, depending upon relationship and sex. Nuclear-Family heritability appeared to be high (72.0%). However, Twins cohort analysis revealed a powerful role for common environment (81.0%) compared with additive genetic heritability (14.5%).

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jaci.2014.07.021

Cites

70 of 70 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 70 references

Metadata

Authors
Alexander, E. S., Martin, L. J., Collins, M. H., Kottyan, L. C., Sucharew, H., He, H., Mukkada, V. A., Succop, P. A., Abonia, J. P., Foote, H., Eby, M. D., Grotjan, T. M., Greenler, A. J., Dellon, E. S., Demain, J. G., Furuta, G. T., Gurian, L. E., Harley, J. B., Hopp, R. J., Kagalwalla, A., Kaul, A., Nadeau, K. C., Noel, R. J., Putnam, P. E., von Tiehl, K. F., & Rothenberg, M. E.
Venue
Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2014-11
Volume
134
Issue
5
Pages
1084-1092.e1
ISSN
0091-6749 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2142243176
Cited by
299
References
70
FWCI
19.12
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Twin and family studies reveal strong environmental and weaker genetic cues explaining heritability of eosinophilic esophagitis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.jaci.2014.07.021
The paper
Alexander, E. S., Martin, L. J., Collins, M. H., Kottyan, L. C., Sucharew, H., He, H., Mukkada, V. A., Succop, P. A., Abonia, J. P., Foote, H., Eby, M. D., Grotjan, T. M., Greenler, A. J., Dellon, E. S., Demain, J. G., Furuta, G. T., Gurian, L. E., Harley, J. B., Hopp, R. J., . . . Rothenberg, M. E. (2014). Twin and family studies reveal strong environmental and weaker genetic cues explaining heritability of eosinophilic esophagitis. Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaci.2014.07.021

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.