Cited by 178Inflammatory Bowel DiseaseHealth Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of LifePsychometric Methodologies and Testing

Evaluation of the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System in a Large Cohort of Patients With Inflammatory Bowel Diseases

Open access
Kappelman, Michael D., Long, Millie D., Martin, Christopher, DeWalt, Darren A., Kinneer, Patricia M., Chen, Wenli, Lewis, James D., Sandler, Robert S.·2014·Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology

Abstract

Background & aims Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) convey important aspects of health status, complementing physician-reported measures. The PRO Measurement Information System (PROMIS) provides valid, widely available measures applicable to patients with chronic illness and the general population. We sought to evaluate these measures in a large cohort of patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Methods By using data from the Crohn's and Colitis Foundation Association Partners internet cohort, we performed cross-sectional and longitudinal analyses to evaluate associations between PROMIS measures and validated disease activity indices (Short Crohn's Disease Activity Index and Simple Clinical Colitis Activity Index) and the Short IBD Questionnaire quality-of-life instrument. Results A total of 10,634 individuals (6689 with Crohn's disease and 3945 with ulcerative colitis or indeterminate colitis) completed PRO testing. Compared with the general population (mean PROMIS score, 50), IBD patients in this cohort reported more depression (mean, 54), anxiety (mean, 52), fatigue (mean, 56), sleep disturbance (mean, 52), and pain interference (mean, 53); and they had less social satisfaction (mean, 48). In each PROMIS domain, there was worse functioning with increasing levels of disease activity and worsening Short IBD Questionnaire scores (P < .001 for all). Longitudinal analyses showed improved PROMIS scores with improved disease activity and worsening PROMIS scores with worsening disease (P < .001 for all comparisons). Conclusions In a cross-sectional and longitudinal study, we observed differences between patients with IBD and the general population in several important aspects of health. The improvement in diverse health outcome measures with improved disease control provides strong support for the construct validity of PROMIS measures in the IBD population. Their use should advance patient-centered outcomes research in IBD.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.cgh.2013.10.019

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kappelman, M. D., Long, M. D., Martin, C., DeWalt, D. A., Kinneer, P. M., Chen, W., Lewis, J. D., & Sandler, R. S.
Affiliations
  • University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US)
  • University of Pennsylvania (US)
Corresponding author
Kappelman, Michael D.
Venue
Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2014-08
Volume
12
Issue
8
Pages
1315-1323.e2
ISSN
1542-3565 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1971726757
Cited by
178
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 20 · 2021: 22 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 16 · 2018: 15 · 2017: 15 · 2016: 24 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 4
FWCI
7.52
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (K08DK088957, P30DK034987)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Inflammatory Bowel Disease
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
Keywords
PROMIS, patient-reported outcomes, inflammatory bowel disease, Crohn's disease, ulcerative colitis, disease activity, construct validity, quality of life, depression, anxiety, fatigue, sleep disorders, pain interference, social satisfaction, patient-centered outcomes research
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Cross-Sectional Studies, Female, Humans, Information Systems, Longitudinal Studies, Male, Middle Aged, Inflammatory Bowel Diseases, Cohort Studies, Treatment Outcome, Patient Satisfaction

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review