Cited by 105Celiac Disease Research and ManagementMedication Adherence and ComplianceChild Nutrition and Feeding Issues

Rate, Risk Factors, and Outcomes of Nonadherence in Pediatric Patients With Celiac Disease: A Systematic Review

Myléus, Anna, Reilly, Norelle R., Green, Peter H.R.·2020·Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology

Abstract

Background and aims The only treatment for celiac disease is strict adherence to a gluten-free diet (GFD). We performed a systematic review to investigate the rate of adherence to a GFD in children with celiac disease, risk factors that affect adherence, and outcomes of non-adherence. Methods We searched PubMed, Cochrane Library, EBSCO, and Scopus for studies through January 2019. We included observational studies of ≥50 children diagnosed with celiac disease and recommended for placement on a GFD. We collected data on adherence assessment (self-report, serology tests, structured dietary interview, biopsies, or assays for gluten immunogenic peptides), risk factors, and outcomes related to adherence. Findings were presented with medians, range, and a narrative synthesis. Results We identified 703 studies; of these, 167 were eligible for full-text assessment and 49 were included in the final analysis, comprising 7850 children. Rates of adherence to a GFD ranged from 23% to 98%. Comparable rates (median rates of adherence, 75%-87%) were found irrespective of how assessments were performed. Adolescents were at risk of non-adherence and children whose parents had good knowledge about celiac disease adhered more strictly. Non-adherence associated with patient growth, symptoms, and quality of life. Conclusion In a systematic review of 49 studies of children with celiac disease, we found substantial variation in adherence to a GFD among patients. Rate of adherence was not associated…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.cgh.2019.05.046

Cites

11 of 11 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Myléus, A., Reilly, N. R., & Green, P. H. R.
Affiliations
  • Umeå University (SE)
  • Columbia University Irving Medical Center (US)
Corresponding author
Myléus, Anna
Venue
Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2020-03
Volume
18
Issue
3
Pages
562-573
ISSN
1542-3565 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2948109422
Cited by
105
References
11
Citations by year
2026: 13 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 18 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 1 · 2017: 1
FWCI
1.95
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Forskningsrådet om Hälsa, Arbetsliv och Välfärd (2006-1512)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Gastroenterology › Celiac Disease Research and Management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Family Practice › Medication Adherence and Compliance
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Child Nutrition and Feeding Issues
Keywords
celiac disease, gluten-free diet, dietary adherence, non-compliance, pediatric patients, adolescents, risk factors, adherence measurement methods, parental knowledge, quality of life, growth, clinical symptoms
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Celiac Disease, Child, Humans, Patient Compliance, Quality of Life, Risk Factors, Diet, Gluten-Free

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review