Cited by 33Celiac Disease Research and ManagementEosinophilic EsophagitisWheat and Barley Genetics and Pathology

Antitissue Transglutaminase Normalization Postdiagnosis in Children With Celiac Disease

Isaac, Daniela Migliarese, Rajani, Seema, Yaskina, Maryna, Huynh, Hien Q., Turner, Justine M.·2017·Journal of Pediatric Gastroenterology and Nutrition

Abstract

Objectives Limited pediatric data exist examining the trend and predictors of antitissue transglutaminase (atTG) normalization over time in children with celiac disease (CD). We aimed to evaluate time to normalization of atTG in children after CD diagnosis, and to assess for independent predictors affecting this duration. Methods A retrospective chart review was completed in pediatric patients with CD diagnosed from 2007 to 2014 at the Stollery Children's Hospital Celiac Clinic (Edmonton, Alberta, Canada). The clinical predictors assessed for impact on time to atTG normalization were initial atTG, Marsh score at diagnosis, gluten-free diet compliance (GFDC), age at diagnosis, sex, ethnicity, medical comorbidities, and family history of CD. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was completed to assess time to atTG normalization, and Cox regression to assess for independent predictors of this time. Results A total of 487 patients met inclusion criteria. Approximately 80.5% of patients normalized atTG levels. Median normalization time was 407 days for all patients (95% confidence interval [CI: 361-453]), and 364 days for gluten-free diet compliant patients (95% CI [335-393]). Type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM) patients took significantly longer to normalize at 1204 days (95% CI [199-2209], P Conclusions GFDC and lower atTG at diagnosis are predictors of earlier normalization. Patients with T1DM are less likely to normalize atTG levels, with longer normalization time. Additional research a…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/mpg.0000000000001480

Cites

20 of 20 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Isaac, D. M., Rajani, S., Yaskina, M., Huynh, H. Q., & Turner, J. M.
Affiliations
  • Department of Pediatric Gastroenterology and Nutrition Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry
  • Department of Pediatrics Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry
  • University of Alberta (CA)
Corresponding author
  • Isaac, Daniela Migliarese
  • Huynh, Hien Q.
  • Turner, Justine M.
Venue
Journal of Pediatric Gastroenterology and Nutrition
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2017-08
Volume
65
Issue
2
Pages
195-199
ISSN
  • 0277-2116 (ISSN-L)
  • 1536-4801
OpenAlex
W2559223315
Cited by
33
References
20
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1
FWCI
1.82
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Pediatric Gastroenterology and Nutrition (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Gastroenterology › Celiac Disease Research and Management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Eosinophilic Esophagitis
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Wheat and Barley Genetics and Pathology
Keywords
celiac disease, pediatric celiac disease, gluten-free diet compliance, type 1 diabetes, antibody serology
MeSH terms
Protein Glutamine gamma Glutamyltransferase 2, Adolescent, Autoantibodies, Autoantigens, Celiac Disease, Child, Child, Preschool, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Infant, Male, Transglutaminases, Retrospective Studies, Biomarkers, Proportional Hazards Models, Treatment Outcome, GTP-Binding Proteins, Kaplan-Meier Estimate, Diet, Gluten-Free

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review