CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 140Liver Disease Diagnosis and TreatmentUltrasound Imaging and ElastographyAdvanced MRI Techniques and Applications

The DOI matches its Crossref record, with a small difference in title or year; 31 of the 31 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Direct Comparison of US and MR Elastography for Staging Liver Fibrosis in Patients With Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease

Open access
Imajo, Kento, Honda, Yasushi, Kobayashi, Takashi, Nagai, Koki, Ozaki, Anna, Iwaki, Michihiro, Kessoku, Takaomi, Ogawa, Yuji, Takahashi, Hirokazu, Saigusa, Yusuke, Yoneda, Masato, Kirikoshi, Hiroyuki, Utsunomiya, Daisuke, Aishima, Shinichi, Saito, Satoru, Nakajima, Atsushi·2022·Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology
DOI 10.1016/j.cgh.2020.12.016
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

BACKGROUND & AIMS: As alternatives to the expensive liver biopsy for assessing liver fibrosis stage in patients with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD), we directly compared the diagnostic abilities of magnetic resonance elastography (MRE), vibration-controlled transient elastography (VCTE), and two-dimensional shear wave elastography (2D-SWE). METHODS: Overall, 231 patients with biopsy-proven NAFLD were included. Intra- and inter-observer reproducibility was analyzed using intraclass correlation coefficient in a sub-group of 70 participants, in whom liver stiffness measurement (LSM) was performed by an elastography expert and an ultrasound expert who was an elastography trainee on the same day. RESULTS: Valid LSMs were obtained for 227, 220, 204, and 201 patients using MRE, VCTE, 2D-SWE, and all three modalities combined, respectively. Although the area under the curve did not differ between the modalities for detecting stage ≥1, ≥2, and ≥3 liver fibrosis, it was higher for MRE than VCTE and 2D-SWE for stage 4. Sex was a significant predictor of discordance between VCTE and liver fibrosis stage. Skin-capsule distance and the ratio of the interquartile range of liver stiffness to the median were significantly associated with discordance between 2D-SWE and liver fibrosis stage. However, no factors were associated with discordance between MRE and liver fibrosis stage. Intra- and inter-observer reproducibility in detecting liver fibrosis was higher for MRE than VCTE and 2D-SWE. CONCLUSIONS: MRE, VCTE, and 2D-SWE demonstrated excellent diagnostic accuracy in detecting liver fibrosis in patients with NAFLD. MRE demonstrated the highest diagnostic accuracy for stage 4 detection and intra- and inter-observer reproducibility. UMIN Clinical Trials Registry No. UMIN000031491.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.cgh.2020.12.016

Cites

31 of 31 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 31 references

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 101–140 of 140

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Imajo, K., Honda, Y., Kobayashi, T., Nagai, K., Ozaki, A., Iwaki, M., Kessoku, T., Ogawa, Y., Takahashi, H., Saigusa, Y., Yoneda, M., Kirikoshi, H., Utsunomiya, D., Aishima, S., Saito, S., & Nakajima, A.
Affiliations
  • Yokohama City University (JP)
  • Saga University (JP)
  • Yokohama City University Hospital (JP)
Corresponding author
Nakajima, Atsushi
ORCID
Venue
Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2022-04
Volume
20
Issue
4
Pages
908-917.e11
ISSN
1542-3565 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1016/j.cgh.2020.12.016
OpenAlex
W3110769583
Cited by
140
References
31
Citations by year
2026: 24 · 2025: 27 · 2024: 31 · 2023: 20 · 2022: 29
FWCI
10.39
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
Locations
  • Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Japan Science and Technology Agency
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Hepatology › Liver Disease Diagnosis and Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Ultrasound Imaging and Elastography
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications
Keywords
non-alcoholic fatty liver disease, liver fibrosis staging, magnetic resonance elastography, vibration-controlled transient elastography, shear wave elastography, liver stiffness measurement, noninvasive fibrosis assessment, observer reproducibility, diagnostic accuracy
MeSH terms
Female, Humans, Liver, Liver Cirrhosis, Male, Reproducibility of Results, Elasticity Imaging Techniques, Non-alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review