The effects and interaction of spatial visualization and domain expertise on information seeking
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Authors with a high level of topic knowledge find more information and more relevant information.
“authors with a high level of topic knowledge find more information and more relevant information (Downing et al., 2005)”
From Core Elements in the Process of Citing Publications: Conceptual Overview of the Literature (2018) · cites this paper as Downing et al., 2005
Cites
Chase, W. G., & Simon, H. A. (1973) · Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1016/0010-0285(73)90004-2 · Cited by 4,479 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Core Elements in the Process of Citing Publications: Conceptual Overview of the Literature
Tahamtan, I., & Bornmann, L. (2018) · Journal of Informetrics · doi:10.1016/j.joi.2018.01.002 · Cited by 149 · see citing works
Older adults’ use of mobile device: usability challenges while navigating various interfaces
Li, Q., & Luximon, Y. (2020) · Behaviour & Information Technology · doi:10.1080/0144929x.2019.1622786 · Cited by 121 · see citing works
Ziefle, M., & Bay, S. (2006) · Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1207/s15327051hci2104_2 · Cited by 99 · see citing works
Tao, D., Or, C. K. L., & Li, K. (2014) · Proceedings of the International Symposium on Human Factors and Ergonomics in Health Care · doi:10.1177/2327857914031008 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
- Authors
- Downing, R. E., Moore, J. L., & Brown, S. W.
- Affiliations
- Rockhurst University (US)
- University of Missouri (US)
- Corresponding author
- Downing, Ricard E.
- ORCID
- Moore, Joi L.
- Venue
- Computers in Human Behavior
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2005-03
- Volume
- 21
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 195-209
- ISSN
- 0747-5632 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1967173551
- Cited by
- 117
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 7
- FWCI
- 14.61
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Computers in Human Behavior (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Automotive Engineering › Spatial Cognition and Navigation
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Information Retrieval and Search Behavior
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Data Visualization and Analytics
- Keywords
- spatial visualization ability, domain knowledge, information seeking, individual differences, archival search, FirstSearch, search time, user interface design, cognitive ability
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
