Cited by 121Technology Use by Older AdultsUsability and User Interface DesignDigital Accessibility for Disabilities

Older adults’ use of mobile device: usability challenges while navigating various interfaces

Open access
Li, Qingchuan, Luximon, Yan·2020·Behaviour & Information Technology

Abstract

Mobile devices are becoming ubiquitous among older adults, but have also caused unprecedented challenges due to the high demands of interaction techniques and changeable design patterns found across various applications. This paper aims to investigate how older adults navigate with mobile interfaces and identify their potential usability challenges while navigating. To do so, we summarised six state-of-the-art mobile interface design patterns and conducted individual usability test and in-depth interview with 22 older adults. Participants were asked to perform 19 navigation tasks that contain these design patterns under realistic usage scenarios. Follow-up interviews were held to collect their detailed comments on usability issues regarding visual design, ease of understanding, and interaction and navigation of the design patterns, as well as their personal experience. The results found that overall older adults were able to navigate contents more effectively than menus and buttons. Participants experienced great challenges in directing their attention to the menus and buttons, understanding the meaning of icons, and interacting with these menu components. In contrast, the content-oriented navigation design performed better in understanding, navigation, and interaction, which could be a promising direction for elderly-friendly mobile application design. Design implications are further discussed for creating an elderly-friendly mobile interface.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/0144929x.2019.1622786

Cites

85 of 85 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Users focused more on the content than navigation cues and did not open vertical menus, such as the side drawer and springboard, to explore menu options further.

    “Users focused more on the content than navigation cues, similar to prior studies [50], and did not open vertical menus, such as the side drawer and springboard to explore menu options further [37].”

    From "Where is history": Toward Designing a Voice Assistant to help Older Adults locate Interface Features quickly (2023) · cites this paper as [37]

    For the claim attached to [37], the Results of activity analysis (page unavailable) report that some older adults could not find the side-drawer entry point or recognize that the side drawer and springboard could be scrolled. But the paper also reports successful menu selection and says participants could search and select side-drawer items once they found its entry point; it does not establish that users generally did not open these menus to explore further options. The content-versus-navigation-cues clause is attached to [50], not [37]. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Not being able to locate the correct features within a reasonable amount of time at either the beginning or during a task constitutes the core struggle of older adults when trying to explore and use a feature-rich UI.

    “Most recently, it has been observed that not being able to locate the correct features-within a reasonable amount of time-at either the beginning or during a task constitutes the core struggle of older adults when trying to explore and use a feature-rich UI [37,45].”

    From "Where is history": Toward Designing a Voice Assistant to help Older Adults locate Interface Features quickly (2023) · cites this paper as [37]

    The Results of activity analysis and the section on assisted navigation buttons report that older adults struggled to find entry points and target buttons, supporting the feature-location aspect. The Tasks section says participants had no time limit, and the paper does not establish failure to locate features within a reasonable time, at either task stage, as the core struggle of using a feature-rich UI. Page numbers were not provided in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.83)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Older adults fixate more on the central part of the screen than the peripheral top and left parts, where many mobile interface menus often reside.

    “Studies have also shown that older adults fxate more on the central part of the screen than the peripheral top and left parts, where many mobile interface menus often reside [37,50].”

    From "Where is history": Toward Designing a Voice Assistant to help Older Adults locate Interface Features quickly (2023) · cites this paper as [37]

    In “Designing for menu-oriented navigation” (page unavailable), the study says participants focused more on content in the middle of the screen and had difficulty directing attention to tab menus alongside it. It does not establish that they fixated less on both the top and left parts of the screen; the same section reports that top-placed tabs improved menu noticeability. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Even tens of features and hidden navigation menu structures can cause usability issues.

    “Although mobile apps do not have hundreds of features as found in desktop interfaces, even tens of features and hidden navigation menu structures can cause usability issues [37].”

    From "Where is history": Toward Designing a Voice Assistant to help Older Adults locate Interface Features quickly (2023) · cites this paper as [37]

    The Results of activity analysis and Designing for menu-oriented navigation sections report usability problems with side-drawer menus and their hamburger-button entry point among older adults. The paper does not establish that apps with ‘tens of features’ cause such problems, and its findings do not directly cover users generally. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Failing to locate the correct feature even once during a task often leads to looping, several back-and-forths, and ultimately task abandonment and user frustration.

    “Although this number might seem low, studies have shown that failing to locate the correct feature even once during a task often leads to looping, several back-andforths, and ultimately task abandonment and user frustration [37,69].”

    From "Where is history": Toward Designing a Voice Assistant to help Older Adults locate Interface Features quickly (2023) · cites this paper as [37]

    The Results of activity analysis (page unavailable) describe participants searching in the wrong places or switching tabs when they could not locate buttons, and report some resulting action failures. They also describe several forward-and-backward flips, but not as a demonstrated sequence from one missed feature to task abandonment. The cited paper does not establish that a single failure to locate a feature often causes that sequence or user frustration. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 6

  1. [16]16. Chen, K., Chan, A. H. S., and Tsang, S. N. H. 2013. "Usage of mobile phones amongst elderly people in Hong Kong." In Proceedings of the International MultiConference of Engineering and Computer Scientists, edited by Ao, S.I., Castillo, O., Douglas, C., Feng, D.D., and Lee, J.A.: 1016-1019. Hong Kong: Newswood Limited.
  2. [30]30. Furuki, K., and Kikuchi, Y. 2013. "Approach to commercialization of Raku-Raku smartphone." FUJITSU Scientific & Technical Journal, 49(2), 196-201.
  3. [36]36. Harris, S. R. 2004. "Systemic-structural activity analysis of HCI video data." In Proceedings of ATIT04: 1st International Workshop on Activity Theory Based Practical Methods for IT-Design, edited by Bertelsen, O.W., Korpela, M., and Mursu, A.: 48-63.
  4. [57]57. Maguire, M., and Osman, Z. 2003. Designing for older and inexperienced mobile phone users. In Proceedings of HCI International, edited by Stephanidis, C.: 22-27. New Jersey: CRC Press.
  5. [62]62. Murano, P., and Oenga, K.K.2012. "The impact on effectiveness and user satisfaction of menu positioning on web pages", International Journal of Advanced Computer Science and Applications, 3(9).
  6. [64]64. Olwal, A., Lachanas, D., and Zacharouli, E. 2011. "OldGen: Mobile phone personalization for older adults." In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems: 3393-3396. New York: ACM.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Li, Q., & Luximon, Y.
Affiliations
Hong Kong Polytechnic University (HK)
Corresponding author
Luximon, Yan
Venue
Behaviour & Information Technology
Published
2019-06-03
Volume
39
Issue
8
Pages
837-861
ISSN
  • 0144-929X (ISSN-L)
  • 1362-3001
OpenAlex
W2948526175
Cited by
121
References
84
Citations by year
2026: 31 · 2025: 24 · 2024: 20 · 2023: 19 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 3
FWCI
15.28
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Behaviour and Information Technology (publishedVersion)
  • PolyU Institutional Research Archive (Hong Kong Polytechnic University) (submittedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Funders
The Hong Kong Polytechnic University (RU9Y)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Demography › Technology Use by Older Adults
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Usability and User Interface Design
  • Social Sciences › Human Factors and Ergonomics › Digital Accessibility for Disabilities
Keywords
older adults, mobile devices, mobile interface design, navigation, usability problems, design patterns, icons, elderly-friendly design

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review