CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 35

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Social reactions toward people vs. computers: How mere lables shape interactions

Aharoni, E., Fridlund, A.J.·2007·Computers in Human Behavior
DOI 10.1016/j.chb.2006.02.019
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.chb.2006.02.019

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 2 references

Research works printed but not linked: 18

  1. Bailenson, J., Aharoni, E., Beall, A., Guadagno, R., Dimov, A., Blascovich, J. (2004). Comparing behavioral and self-report measures of agents’ social presence in immersive virtual environments. In Proceedings of the 7th annual international workshop on PRESENCE (2004, Valencia, Spain).
  2. Bailenson, 2003, Interpersonal distance in immersive virtual environments, Personality & Social Psychology Bulletin, 29, 819, 10.1177/0146167203029007002 · DOI
  3. Baumeister, 1982, A self-presentational view of social phenomena, Psychological Bulletin, 91, 3, 10.1037/0033-2909.91.1.3 · DOI
  4. Bonito, J., Burgoon, J., Bengtsson, B. (1999). The role of expectations in human–computer interaction. In Proceedings of the international ACM SIGGROUP conference on supporting group work. · DOI
  5. Burgoon, 1998, The nature and measurement of interpersonal dominance, Communication Monographs, 65, 308, 10.1080/03637759809376456 · DOI
  6. De Laere, 1998, The electronic mirror: human–computer interaction and change in self appraisals, Computers in Human Behavior, 14, 43, 10.1016/S0747-5632(97)00031-9 · DOI
  7. Kacmar, 1999, Effectiveness of impression management tactics across human resource situations, Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 29, 1203
  8. Lautenschlager, 1990, Computer administration of questions: more desirable or more socially desirable?, Journal of Applied Psychology, 75, 310, 10.1037/0021-9010.75.3.310 · DOI
  9. Lee, 2002, Experimental tests of normative group influence and representation effects in computer-mediated communication: when interacting via computers differs from interacting with computers, Human Communication Research, 28, 349
  10. Mandler, 1961, The response to threat: relations among verbal and physiological indices, Psychological Monographs, 75, 22
  11. Martin, 1989, Some effects of computerized interviewing on job applicant responses, Journal of Applied Psychology, 74, 72, 10.1037/0021-9010.74.1.72 · DOI
  12. Nass, 1999, Are people polite to computers? Responses to computer-based interviewing systems, Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 29, 1093, 10.1111/j.1559-1816.1999.tb00142.x · DOI · Paper page
  13. Nass, 1995, Can computer personalities be human personalities?, International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 43, 223, 10.1006/ijhc.1995.1042 · DOI
  14. Nass, 1994, Machines, social attributions, and ethopoeia: performance assessments of computers subsequent to “self-” and “other-” evaluations, International Journal of Man-Machine Studies, 40, 543
  15. Resnik, 1985, The influence of self-esteem on cognitive responses to machine-like versus human-like computer feedback, Journal of Social Psychology, 125, 761, 10.1080/00224545.1985.9713550 · DOI
  16. Schechtman, N., Horowitz, L. (2003). Media inequality in conversation: how people behave differently when interacting with computers and people. In Proceedings of the CHI 2003 conference on human–computer interaction. Ft. Lauderdale, FL, April 5–10. · DOI
  17. Parise, 1999, Cooperating with life-like interface agents, Computers in Human Behavior, 15, 123, 10.1016/S0747-5632(98)00035-1 · DOI
  18. Wenger, 1991, On the rhetorical contract in human–computer interaction, Computers in Human Behavior, 7, 245, 10.1016/0747-5632(91)90013-Q · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 35

Metadata

Authors
Aharoni, E., & Fridlund, A. J.
Venue
Computers in Human Behavior
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2007-09
Volume
23
Issue
5
Pages
2175-2189
ISSN
0747-5632
DOI
10.1016/j.chb.2006.02.019
Cited by
35
References
2
Language
en
Licence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review