Cited by 90

E-mail characteristics, work performance and distress

Mano, Rita S., Mesch, Gustavo S.·2010·Computers in Human Behavior

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.chb.2009.08.005

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • This study corroborates findings that email handling strategies are more strongly related to negative, rather than positive, indicators of well-being.

    “This study corroborates findings that email handling strategies are more strongly related to negative, rather than positive, indicators of well-being”

    From For whom and under what circumstances does email message batching work? (2022) · cites this paper as Mano and Mesch, 2010

  • Research suggests that email interruptions and strategies to reduce them have a stronger effect on negative well-being indicators than positive well-being indicators.

    “This finding is in line with research that suggests that email interruptions and strategies to reduce them have a stronger effect on negative well-being indicators than positive well-being indicators”

    From For whom and under what circumstances does email message batching work? (2022) · cites this paper as Mano and Mesch, 2010

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Mano, R. S., & Mesch, G. S.
Venue
Computers in Human Behavior
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2010-01
Volume
26
Issue
1
Pages
61-69
ISSN
0747-5632
Cited by
90
References
1
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review