Cited by 202Technostress in Professional SettingsStress and Burnout ResearchWorkplace Health and Well-being

Use of information communication technology and stress, burnout, and mental health in older, middle-aged, and younger workers – results from a systematic review

Open access
Berg-Beckhoff, Gabriele, Nielsen, Grace, Ladekjær Larsen, Eva·2017·International Journal of Occupational and Environmental Health

Abstract

The aim of this systematic review is to summarise quantitative studies in occupational settings observing the association between Information communication technology (ICT) and stress, and burnout, considering age as an effect modifier. A systematic review using PRISMA guidelines was conducted through the following bibliographic databases: PubMed, Web of Science, Psycinfo, and the Cochrane Library. Inclusion criteria were occupational settings and content relevant to our research question. Risk of bias was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa scale. Two interventional, 4 cohorts, and 29 cross-sectional studies were found. ICT use in occupational settings was associated with stress seen in cross-sectional studies, but not in interventional studies. There was a concordant association with ICT and burnout in different study designs. Overall, there were no linear trends between age and technostress. We suggest that the observed associations were mostly present in the middle-aged working population and that these associations need to be supported in further studies.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/10773525.2018.1436015

Cites

63 of 63 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Some previous technostress reviews deal with leadership only in passing.

    “or deal with it only in passing (Berg-Beckhoff et al. 2017;Gualano et al. 2023;Marsh et al. 2022;Pflügner 2022;Rohwer et al. 2022;Shirmohammadi et al. 2022)”

    From Leadership and technostress: A systematic literature review (2025) · cites this paper as Berg-Beckhoff et al. 2017

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

5 of the 68 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 6

  1. Tarafdar M, Pullins EB, Ragu-Nathan TS. Technostress: negative effect on performance and possible mitigations. Inf Syst J. 2015;25(2):103-132.
  2. Maslach C, Schaufeli WB, Leiter MP. Job burnout. Ann Rev Psychol. 2001;52(1):397-422.
  3. La Paglia F, Caci B, Barbera LD. Technostress: a research about computer self-efficacy, internet attitude and computer anxiety. Ann Rev Cybertherapy Telemed. 2008;6:63-69.
  4. Day A, Scott N, Kelloway EK. Information and communication technology: implications for job stress and employee well-being. In: Perrewé og Ganster DC (red). New developments in theoretical and conceptual approaches to job stress. Research in occupational stress and well-being. Vol. 8. Emerald Group Publishing Limited; 2010. p. 317-350. References
  5. Korpinen L, Pääkkönen R. Working-aged population's mental symptoms and the use of the internet. Mental Illness. 2011;3(1):25-28.
  6. Barnett K, Spoehr J, Moretti C, Gregory T, Chiveralls K. AISR -Technology at work: stress, work and technology across the life cycle -literature review. The University of Adelaide: Australian Institute For Social Research Reported prepared for SafeWork SA Adelaide, Australia 2011.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Berg-Beckhoff, G., Nielsen, G., & Ladekjær Larsen, E.
Affiliations
  • Unit for Health Promotion Research, University of Southern Denmark, Esbjerg, Denmark
  • University of Southern Denmark (DK)
Venue
International Journal of Occupational and Environmental Health
Published
2017-04-03
Volume
23
Issue
2
Pages
160-171
ISSN
  • 1077-3525 (ISSN-L)
  • 2049-3967
OpenAlex
W2789061384
Cited by
197
References
68
Citations by year
2026: 16 · 2025: 31 · 2024: 31 · 2023: 39 · 2022: 37 · 2021: 27 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 4
FWCI
0.68
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • International Journal of Occupational and Environmental Health (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • University of Southern Denmark Research Portal (University of Southern Denmark) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Technostress in Professional Settings
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Stress and Burnout Research
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Workplace Health and Well-being
Keywords
information and communication technologies, technostress, burnout, occupational stress, mental health, age effect modification, older workers, middle-aged workers, young workers
MeSH terms
Information Technology, Adult, Age Factors, Burnout, Professional, Humans, Mental Health, Middle Aged, Stress, Psychological, Prevalence, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review