The influence of achievement goals and perceptions of online help on its actual use in an interactive learning environment
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Huet et al. (2011) found a positive relationship between students' mastery of goals and their perceptions of help-seeking in an interactive learning environment.
“Huet et al. (2011) found a positive relationship between students' mastery of goals and their perceptions of help-seeking in an interactive learning environment.”
From A Systematic Review of Studies Exploring Help-Seeking Strategies in Online Learning Environments (2023) · cites this paper as Huet et al., 2011
High mastery goals were related to high perception of a threat to a learner's autonomy but not to the use of help.
“Their findings revealed that high mastery goals were related to high perception of a threat to a learner's autonomy but not to the use of help.”
From A Systematic Review of Studies Exploring Help-Seeking Strategies in Online Learning Environments (2023) · cites this paper as Huet et al., 2011
Cites
Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology
Davis, F. D. (1989) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/249008 · Cited by 68,483 · see citing works
Help Seeking and Help Design in Interactive Learning Environments
Aleven, V., Stahl, E., Schworm, S., Fischer, F., & Wallace, R. (2003) · Review of Educational Research · doi:10.3102/00346543073003277 · Cited by 609 · see citing works
Butler, R. (1998) · Journal of Educational Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-0663.90.4.630 · Cited by 236 · see citing works
Limitations of Student Control: Do Students Know when They Need Help?
Aleven, V., & Koedinger, K. R. (2000) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/3-540-45108-0_33 · Cited by 236 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
A Systematic Review of Studies Exploring Help-Seeking Strategies in Online Learning Environments
Yang, F., & Stefaniak, J. (2023) · Online Learning · doi:10.24059/olj.v27i1.3400 · Cited by 27 · see citing works
Asking generative artificial intelligence the right questions improves writing performance
Cheng, Y., Fan, Y., Li, X., Chen, G., Gašević, D., & Swiecki, Z. (2025) · Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1016/j.caeai.2025.100374 · Cited by 21 · see citing works
Jiang, X., & Yu, Z. (2025) · Interactive Learning Environments · doi:10.1080/10494820.2025.2457352 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
- Authors
- Huet, N., Escribe, C., Dupeyrat, C., & Sakdavong, J.-C.
- Affiliations
- Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR)
- Corresponding author
- Huet, Nathalie
- Venue
- Computers in Human Behavior
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2011-01
- Volume
- 27
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 413-420
- ISSN
- 0747-5632 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1968431377
- Cited by
- 59
- References
- 4
- Citations by year
- 2025: 7 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 3 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 2
- FWCI
- 7.37
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Computers in Human Behavior (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Intelligent Tutoring Systems and Adaptive Learning
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Education, Achievement, and Giftedness
- Keywords
- achievement goals, help-seeking, online support, mastery goals, performance goals, instrumental support, learner autonomy, perceived competence, technology acceptance model, interactive learning environment, statistics learning
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review