Cited by 33Death Anxiety and Social ExclusionDeath, Funerary Practices, and MourningMedia Influence and Health

Death of a salesman: Webpage-based manipulations of mortality salience

Chopik, William J., Edelstein, Robin S.·2014·Computers in Human Behavior

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.chb.2013.10.022

Cites

8 of 8 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Chopik, W. J., & Edelstein, R. S.
Affiliations
University of Michigan (US)
Corresponding author
Chopik, William J.
Venue
Computers in Human Behavior
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2014-02
Volume
31
Pages
94-99
ISSN
0747-5632 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2020836136
Cited by
33
References
8
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 1
FWCI
3.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Computers in Human Behavior (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Science Foundation
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Death Anxiety and Social Exclusion
  • Social Sciences › Anthropology › Death, Funerary Practices, and Mourning
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Literature and Literary Theory › Media Influence and Health
Keywords
mortality salience, terror management theory, online advertising, worldview defense, luxury consumption, consumer spending, death-related thoughts, online consumer behavior, cultural values

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review