The DOI matches its Crossref record; 62 of the 63 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Investigating student motivation in the context of a learning analytics intervention during a summer bridge program
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Furthermore, recent studies on the effectiveness of existing dashboards suggest that learner goal orientations (Lonn et al., 2015) and differences in achievement levels (Park & Jo, 2015) need to be carefully considered in the design of any intervention, as the resulting approaches and tools can affect students' interpretations of their data and subsequent academic success.”
From Linking learning behavior analytics and learning science concepts: Designing a learning analytics dashboard for feedback to support learning regulation (2020) · cites this paper as Lonn et al., 2015
In the citing paper
“Several researchers argue that showing an aggregated analysis with respect to peer performance is a good approach (Lonn et al., 2015).”
From Linking learning behavior analytics and learning science concepts: Designing a learning analytics dashboard for feedback to support learning regulation (2020) · cites this paper as Lonn et al., 2015
Citations
Cites
Intrinsic Motivation and Self-Determination in Human Behavior
Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1985) · doi:10.1007/978-1-4899-2271-7 · Cited by 26,772
Leaving College: Rethinking the Causes and Cures of Student Attrition
Bean, J. P., & Tinto, V. (1988) · The Journal of Higher Education · doi:10.2307/1982243 · Cited by 7,408
Student Involvement: A Developmental Theory for Higher Education
Astin, A. W. (2014) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9781315051888-15 · Cited by 5,251
A 2 × 2 achievement goal framework.
Elliot, A. J., & McGregor, H. A. (2001) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037//0022-3514.80.3.501 · Cited by 3,953
Cognitive Apprenticeship: Teaching the Crafts of Reading, Writing, and Mathematics
Collins, A., Brown, J. S., & Newman, S. E. (2018) · Knowing, Learning, and Instruction · doi:10.4324/9781315044408-14 · Cited by 3,674
Goals: An approach to motivation and achievement.
Elliott, E. S., & Dweck, C. S. (1988) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037//0022-3514.54.1.5 · Cited by 3,098
Approach and avoidance achievement goals and intrinsic motivation: A mediational analysis.
Elliot, A. J., & Harackiewicz, J. M. (1996) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.70.3.461 · Cited by 2,666
(2013) · Cited by 1,951
(2006) · US Department of Education · Cited by 1,586
Revision of achievement goal theory: Necessary and illuminating.
Harackiewicz, J. M., Barron, K. E., Pintrich, P. R., Elliot, A. J., & Thrash, T. M. (2002) · Journal of Educational Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-0663.94.3.638 · Cited by 1,474
Research works printed but not linked: 3
- Fitts, J. D. (1989). A comparison of locus of control and achievement among remedial summer bridge and nonbridge students in community colleges in New Jersey (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ.
- Howley, I., & Rosé, C. P. (2014). Undergraduate attitudes toward help-seeking. In Proceedings of the 11th international conference of the learning sciences (pp. 1561–2562). Boulder, CO: International Society of the Learning Sciences.
- Lepper, 1981, Intrinsic and extrinsic motivation in children: Detrimental effects of superfluous social controls, Vol. 14, 155
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Aldowah, H., Al-Samarraie, H., & Fauzy, W. M. (2019) · Telematics and Informatics · doi:10.1016/j.tele.2019.01.007 · Cited by 564
Matcha, W., Uzir, N. A., Gašević, D., & Pardo, A. (2019) · IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies · doi:10.1109/tlt.2019.2916802 · Cited by 472
Visual learning analytics of educational data: A systematic literature review and research agenda
Vieira, C., Parsons, P., & Byrd, V. (2018) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2018.03.018 · Cited by 316
Sedrakyan, G., Malmberg, J., Verbert, K., Järvelä, S., & Kirschner, P. A. (2020) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2018.05.004 · Cited by 283
Jivet, I., Scheffel, M., Specht, M. M., & Drachsler, H. (2018) · International Conference on Learning Analytics and Knowledge (LAK) · doi:10.1145/3170358.3170421 · Cited by 310
Metadata
- Authors
- Lonn, S., Aguilar, S. J., & Teasley, S. D.
- Affiliations
- University of Michigan (US)
- Corresponding author
- Lonn, Steven
- Venue
- Computers in Human Behavior
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2015-06
- Volume
- 47
- Pages
- 90-97
- ISSN
- 0747-5632 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1981210033
- Cited by
- 152
- References
- 63
- Citations by year
- 2026: 7 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 22 · 2019: 21 · 2018: 19 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 7
- FWCI
- 9.42
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Computers in Human Behavior (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Science Applications › Online Learning and Analytics
- Social Sciences › Education › Higher Education Research Studies
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Education, Achievement, and Giftedness
- Keywords
- student motivation, summer bridge programs, mastery orientation, academic advising, student retention, at-risk students, high-impact practices
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
