Cited by 174Digital Marketing and Social MediaGaze Tracking and Assistive TechnologyVisual Attention and Saliency Detection

Tracking users' visual attention and responses to personalized advertising based on task cognitive demand

Bang, Hyejin, Wojdynski, Bartosz W.·2016·Computers in Human Behavior

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.chb.2015.10.025

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bang, H., & Wojdynski, B. W.
Affiliations
University of Georgia (US)
Corresponding author
Bang, Hyejin
Venue
Computers in Human Behavior
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2016-02
Volume
55
Pages
867-876
ISSN
0747-5632 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2177961586
Cited by
174
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 18 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 22 · 2022: 25 · 2021: 22 · 2020: 21 · 2019: 18 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 1
FWCI
27.64
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Computers in Human Behavior (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Digital Marketing and Social Media
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Gaze Tracking and Assistive Technology
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Visual Attention and Saliency Detection
Keywords
personalized advertising, banner advertising, visual attention, cognitive load, eye tracking, consumer attitudes toward advertising

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review