Cited by 75Privacy, Security, and Data ProtectionDigital Marketing and Social MediaConsumer Market Behavior and Pricing

Gen Z's personalization paradoxes: A privacy calculus examination of digital personalization and brand behaviors

Open access
McKee, Kathleen M., Dahl, Andrew J., Peltier, James W.·2024·Journal of Consumer Behaviour

Abstract

Employing privacy calculus theory, we examine why Gen Z consumers increasingly adopt ad blockers, use private browsers, or take other measures to limit data tracking. Specifically, we evaluate consumer behaviors related to personalized and non‐personalized digital marketing in light of two personalization paradoxes: privacy–benefits and avoidance–annoyance . Using structural equation modeling on a sample of 414 Gen Z consumers, our findings show that both the privacy–benefits paradox and avoidance–annoyance paradox strongly influence consumers' intentions to avoid brands that fail to personalize marketing efforts. We also explore the interaction effects of the two digital personalization tensions, showing that tradeoffs exist between the utilization of these two paradoxes. Our findings underscore key implications for marketers investing in personalized marketing efforts to enhance consumer–brand relationships.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/cb.2199

Cites

79 of 79 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
McKee, K. M., Dahl, A. J., & Peltier, J. W.
Affiliations
  • University of Wisconsin–Parkside (US)
  • University of Wisconsin–Whitewater (US)
Corresponding author
Dahl, Andrew J.
Venue
Journal of Consumer Behaviour
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2023-06-28
Volume
23
Issue
2
Pages
405-422
ISSN
  • 1472-0817 (ISSN-L)
  • 1479-1838
OpenAlex
W4382358870
Cited by
75
References
79
Citations by year
2026: 32 · 2025: 29 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 3
FWCI
32.23
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
Journal of Consumer Behaviour (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Privacy, Security, and Data Protection
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Digital Marketing and Social Media
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Marketing › Consumer Market Behavior and Pricing
Keywords
Generation Z, privacy calculus, digital personalization, personalized marketing, ad blockers, private browsing, data tracking, consumer-brand relationships, brand avoidance, consumer privacy behavior

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review