Process-mining enabled feedback: “tell me what I did wrong” vs. “tell me how to do it right”
Open accessThe claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
LA-based feedback helps educators to receive recommendations through automatic feedback for better pedagogical interventions.
“the use of LA for feedback helps educators to receive recommendations through automatic feedback for better pedagogical interventions (e.g. Azcona et al., 2019; Sedrakyan et al., 2016).”
From A systematic review of the role of learning analytics in enhancing feedback practices in higher education (2022) · cites this paper as Sedrakyan et al., 2016
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology
Davis, F. D. (1989) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/249008 · Cited by 68,483 · see citing works
User Acceptance of Information Technology: Toward A Unified View1
Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis, G. B., & Davis, F. D. (2003) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/30036540 · Cited by 45,035 · see citing works
User Acceptance of Computer Technology: A Comparison of Two Theoretical Models
Davis, F. D., Bagozzi, R. P., & Warshaw, P. R. (1989) · Management Science · doi:10.1287/mnsc.35.8.982 · Cited by 25,709 · see citing works
Computer Self-Efficacy: Development of a Measure and Initial Test
Compeau, D. R., & Higgins, C. A. (1995) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/249688 · Cited by 6,553 · see citing works
Shute, V. J. (2008) · Review of Educational Research · doi:10.3102/0034654307313795 · Cited by 4,631 · cited 2× · see citing works
“…referred to as outcome feedback, indicating whether or not results are correct (Butler &Winne, 1995), in feedback research the effectiveness of more informative types of feedback that guide the process of cognitive activities is highlighted (Butler & Winne, 1995; Narciss, 2008; Shute, 2008).”
BackgroundSelf-Regulated Learning and Academic Achievement: An Overview
Zimmerman, B. J. (1990) · Educational Psychologist · doi:10.1207/s15326985ep2501_2 · Cited by 3,687 · see citing works
Feedback and Self-Regulated Learning: A Theoretical Synthesis
Butler, D. L., & Winne, P. H. (1995) · Review of Educational Research · doi:10.3102/00346543065003245 · Cited by 3,334 · see citing works
A framework for information systems architecture
Zachman, J. A. (1987) · IBM Systems Journal · doi:10.1147/sj.263.0276 · Cited by 3,232 · see citing works
Understanding quality in conceptual modeling
Lindland, O. I., Sindre, G., & Sølvberg, A. (1994) · IEEE Software · doi:10.1109/52.268955 · Cited by 874 · see citing works
User Acceptance of Computer Technology
DavisFred, D., BagozziRichard, P., & WarshawPaul, R. (1989) · Management Science · doi:10.5555/2797314.2797319 · Cited by 620 · see citing works
Self-Regulated, Co-Regulated, and Socially Shared Regulation of Learning
Hadwin, A. F., Järvelä, S., & Miller, M. (2015) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9780203839010.ch5 · Cited by 509 · see citing works
Feedback Strategies for Interactive Learning Tasks
Narciss, S. (2007) · doi:10.4324/9780203880869.ch11 · Cited by 388 · see citing works
Process mining techniques for analysing patterns and strategies in students’ self-regulated learning
Bannert, M., Reimann, P., & Sonnenberg, C. (2013) · Metacognition and Learning · doi:10.1007/s11409-013-9107-6 · Cited by 322 · see citing works
ProM : the process mining toolkit
van der Aalst, W. M. P., van Dongen, B. F., Günther, C. C., Rozinat, A., Verbeek, H. M. W., & Weijters, T. (2009) · TU/e Research Portal · Cited by 288 · see citing works
Model Driven Engineering: An Emerging Technical Space
Bézivín, J. (2006) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/11877028_2 · Cited by 235 · see citing works
Using ontology to validate conceptual models
Shanks, G., Tansley, E., & Weber, R. (2003) · Communications of the ACM · doi:10.1145/944217.944244 · Cited by 234 · see citing works
Differences Between Novice and Expert Systems Analysts: What Do We Know and What Do We Do?
Schenk, K., Vitalari, N. P., & Davis, K. (1998) · Journal of Management Information Systems · doi:10.1080/07421222.1998.11518195 · Cited by 231 · see citing works
Siau, K. L., & Cao, Q. (2001) · Journal of Database Management · doi:10.4018/jdm.2001010103 · Cited by 175 · see citing works
Arvaja, M., Salovaara, H., Häkkinen, P., & Järvelä, S. (2007) · Learning and Instruction · doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2007.04.003 · Cited by 170 · see citing works
Sequential and temporal characteristics of self and socially regulated learning
Molenaar, I., & Järvelä, S. (2014) · Metacognition and Learning · doi:10.1007/s11409-014-9114-2 · Cited by 160 · see citing works
A conceptual modeling quality framework
Nelson, H. J., Poels, G., Genero, M., & Piattini, M. G. (2011) · Software Quality Journal · doi:10.1007/s11219-011-9136-9 · Cited by 147 · see citing works
Analyzing the structure of expert knowledge
Bradley, J. H., Paul, R. C., & Seeman, E. D. (2006) · Information Manager (The) · doi:10.1016/j.im.2004.11.009 · Cited by 134 · see citing works
Weerdt, J. D., Schupp, A., Vanderloock, A., et al. (2012) · Computers in Industry · doi:10.1016/j.compind.2012.09.010 · Cited by 129 · see citing works
Masón, L., Pluchino, P., & Tornatora, M. C. (2015) · Contemporary Educational Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.cedpsych.2015.01.004 · Cited by 126 · see citing works
Foundations of the Learning Sciences
Nathan, M. J., & Sawyer, R. K. (2014) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9781139519526.004 · Cited by 117 · see citing works
Information engineering, book ii planning and analysis.
Martin, J. (2014) · Cited by 86 · see citing works
Handbook of Conceptual Modeling: Theory, Practice, and Research Challenges
Embley, D. W., & Thalheim, B. (2011) · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-15865-0 · Cited by 75 · see citing works
Styles in business process modeling: an exploration and a model
Pinggera, J., Soffer, P., Fahland, D., Weidlich, M., Zugal, S., Weber, B., Reijers, H. A., & Mendling, J. (2013) · Software & Systems Modeling · doi:10.1007/s10270-013-0349-1 · Cited by 71 · see citing works
Theoretical vs. Practical Complexity
Siau, K. L., Erickson, J., & Lee, L. (2005) · Journal of Database Management · doi:10.4018/jdm.2005070103 · Cited by 68 · see citing works
Visualization and the process of modeling
Crapo, A. W., Waisel, L. B., Wallace, W. A., & Willemain, T. R. (2000) · ACM SIGKDD Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (KDD) · doi:10.1145/347090.347129 · Cited by 68 · see citing works
Process Mining Online Assessment Data
Pechenizkiy, M., Trčka, N., Vasilyeva, E., van der Aalst, W. M. P., & Bra, P. P. D. (2009) · TU/e Research Portal · Cited by 68 · see citing works
The impact of structural complexity on the understandability of UML statechart diagrams
Cruz-Lemus, J. A., Maes, A., Genero, M., et al. (2010) · Information Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.ins.2010.01.026 · Cited by 64 · see citing works
Assessing the effectiveness of feedback enabled simulation in teaching conceptual modeling
Sedrakyan, G., Snoeck, M., & Poelmans, S. (2014) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2014.06.014 · Cited by 63 · see citing works
Self-citationCruz-Lemus, J. A., Genero, M., Manso, M. E., Morasca, S., & Piattini, M. G. (2009) · Empirical Software Engineering · doi:10.1007/s10664-009-9106-z · Cited by 63 · see citing works
From Local Patterns to Global Models: Towards Domain Driven Educational Process Mining
Trčka, N., & Pechenizkiy, M. (2009) · International Conference on Intelligent Systems Design and Applications (ISDA) · doi:10.1109/isda.2009.159 · Cited by 61 · see citing works
Tying Process Model Quality to the Modeling Process: The Impact of Structuring, Movement, and Speed
Claes, J., Vanderfeesten, I., Reijers, H. A., et al. (2012) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-32885-5_3 · Cited by 56 · see citing works
A visual analysis of the process of process modeling
Claes, J., Vanderfeesten, I., Pinggera, J., et al. (2014) · Information Systems and e-Business Management · doi:10.1007/s10257-014-0245-4 · Cited by 52 · see citing works
Bernaert, M., Poels, G., Snoeck, M., & Backer, M. D. (2013) · Progress in IS · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-38244-4_4 · Cited by 49 · see citing works
Self-citationHow Novices Model Business Processes
Recker, J., Safrudin, N., & Rosemann, M. (2010) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-15618-2_5 · Cited by 42 · see citing works
Sedrakyan, G., Snoeck, M., & Weerdt, J. D. (2014) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2014.09.054 · Cited by 41 · see citing works
Self-citationEvaluation of the comprehension of the dynamic modeling in UML
Otero, M. C., & Dolado, J. J. (2003) · Information and Software Technology · doi:10.1016/s0950-5849(03)00108-3 · Cited by 40 · see citing works
Process Mining from Educational Data
(2010) · CRC Press eBooks · doi:10.1201/b10274-15 · Cited by 38 · see citing works
Enterprise Information Systems Engineering : The MERODE Approach
Snoeck, M. (2014) · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-10145-3 · Cited by 37 · see citing works
Self-citationDefining Metrics for UML Statechart Diagrams in a Methodological Way
Genero, M., Miranda, D. B., & Piattini, M. G. (2003) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-540-39597-3_12 · Cited by 37 · see citing works
Consistency by Construction: The Case of MERODE
Snoeck, M., Michiels, C., & Dedene, G. (2003) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-540-39597-3_11 · Cited by 37 · see citing works
Self-citationOutcome feedback during collaborative learning: Contingencies between feedback and dyad composition
Asterhan, C. S. C., Schwarz, B. B., & Cohen-Eliyahu, N. (2014) · Learning and Instruction · doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2014.07.003 · Cited by 37 · see citing works
Can UML be simplified? Practitioner use of UML in separate domains
Erickson, J., & Siau, K. L. (2007) · Cited by 37 · see citing works
A constructivist approach in a blended e-learning environment for statistics
Poelmans, S., & Wessa, P. (2013) · Interactive Learning Environments · doi:10.1080/10494820.2013.766890 · Cited by 36 · see citing works
Learning analytics on coursera event data: a process mining approach
Mukala, M. P., Buijs, J. J., Leemans, M., et al. (2015) · TU/e Research Portal · Cited by 32 · see citing works
Cognitive Mechanisms of Conceptual Modelling
Wilmont, I., Hengeveld, S. J., Barendsen, E., & Hoppenbrouwers, S. J. B. A. (2013) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-41924-9_7 · Cited by 31 · see citing works
Requirements Engineering for Embedded Systems: An Investigation of Industry Needs
Sikora, E., Tenbergen, B., & Pohl, K. (2011) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-19858-8_16 · Cited by 30 · see citing works
Process Mining to Support Students' Collaborative Writing.
Southavilay, V., Yacef, K., & Calvo, R. A. (2010) · Cited by 30 · see citing works
What are the used UML diagrams? A Preliminary Survey.
Reggio, G., Leotta, M., Ricca, F., & Clerissi, D. (2013) · Cited by 30 · see citing works
Keller, C. (2009) · Communications of the Association for Information Systems · doi:10.17705/1cais.02538 · Cited by 26 · see citing works
Technology-Enhanced Support for Learning Conceptual Modeling
Sedrakyan, G., & Snoeck, M. (2012) · Lecture notes in business information processing · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-31072-0_30 · Cited by 22 · see citing works
Self-citationFacilitating Self-Regulated Learning With Technology
Barber, L. K., Bagsby, P. G., Grawitch, M. J., et al. (2011) · Teaching of Psychology · doi:10.1177/0098628311421337 · Cited by 20 · see citing works
Using Controlled Experiments for Validating UML Statechart Diagrams Measures
Cruz-Lemus, J. A., Genero, M., & Piattini, M. G. (2008) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-540-85553-8_11 · Cited by 17 · see citing works
Identifying the Weaknesses of UML Class Diagrams during Data Model Comprehension
Bavota, G., Gravino, C., Oliveto, R., et al. (2016) · Cited by 15 · see citing works
A PIM-to-Code Requirements Engineering Framework
Sedrakyan, G., & Snoeck, M. (2013) · International Conference on Model-Driven Engineering and Software Development · doi:10.5220/0004344701630169 · Cited by 15 · see citing works
Self-citationFeedback-Enabled MDA-Prototyping Effects on Modeling Knowledge
Sedrakyan, G., & Snoeck, M. (2013) · Lecture notes in business information processing · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-38484-4_29 · Cited by 14 · see citing works
Self-citationEffects of Simulation on Novices’ Understanding of the Concept of Inheritance in Conceptual Modeling
Sedrakyan, G., & Snoeck, M. (2015) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-25747-1_32 · Cited by 13 · see citing works
Self-citationLightweight Semantic Prototyper for Conceptual Modeling
Sedrakyan, G., & Snoeck, M. (2014) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-12256-4_32 · Cited by 11 · see citing works
Self-citationA Meta-language for EA Information Modeling – State-of-the-Art and Requirements Elicitation
Buckl, S., Matthes, F., & Schweda, C. M. (2010) · Lecture notes in business information processing · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-13051-9_15 · Cited by 10 · see citing works
The Modeling Mind: Behavior Patterns in Process Modeling
Pinggera, J., Zugal, S., Furtner, M. R., Sachse, P., Martini, M., & Weber, B. (2014) · Lecture notes in business information processing · doi:10.1007/978-3-662-43745-2_1 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
Conceptual Modeling and Integration of Static and Dynamic Aspects of Service Architectures
Gustas, R. (2010) · Lecture notes in business information processing · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-16496-5_2 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
Do we need to teach testing skills in courses on requirements engineering and modelling
Sedrakyan, G., & Snoeck, M. (2014) · Lirias · Cited by 8 · see citing works
Self-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 2
- Carbone, M., & Santucci, G. (2002). Fast&&Serious: a UML based metric for effort estimation. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 6th ECOOP workshop on quantitative approaches in object-oriented software engineering (QAOOSE'02).
- Cruz-Lemus, J. A., Genero, M., Morasca, S., & Piattini, M. (2007). Using practitioners for assessing the understandability of UML statechart diagrams with composite states Advances in Conceptual Modeling-Foundations and Applications (pp. 213-222): Springer.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Sedrakyan, G., Malmberg, J., Verbert, K., Järvelä, S., & Kirschner, P. A. (2020) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2018.05.004 · Cited by 283 · see citing works
Self-citationBanihashem, S. K., Noroozi, O., van Ginkel, S., Macfadyen, L. P., & Biemans, H. J. A. (2022) · Educational Research Review · doi:10.1016/j.edurev.2022.100489 · Cited by 246 · see citing works
- Authors
- Sedrakyan, G., De Weerdt, J., & Snoeck, M.
- Affiliations
- KU Leuven (BE)
- Corresponding author
- Sedrakyan, Gayane
- Venue
- Computers in Human Behavior
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2016-04
- Volume
- 57
- Pages
- 352-376
- ISSN
- 0747-5632 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2216293510
- Cited by
- 62
- References
- 66
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 1
- FWCI
- 8.03
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- lirias.kuleuven.be
- Licence
- Locations
- Computers in Human Behavior (publishedVersion)
- Lirias (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Science Applications › Online Learning and Analytics
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management Information Systems › Business Process Modeling and Analysis
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Intelligent Tutoring Systems and Adaptive Learning
- Keywords
- process mining, feedback, domain modeling, novice learners, problem solving, model validation, virtual learning environments, process-oriented feedback, outcome feedback, teaching guidance, replication study
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
