Exploring privacy paradox in information- sensitive mobile app adoption: a cross-cultural comparison
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Future app use is not limited by privacy concerns.
“In this line, Pentina et al. (2016) found that future app use is not limited by privacy concerns.”
From Putting the privacy paradox to the test: Online privacy and security behaviors among users with technical knowledge, privacy awareness, and financial resources (2019) · cites this paper as Pentina et al. (2016)
Extraversion and agreeableness increased perceived benefits from the use of mobile applications, regardless of the cultural environment.
“Extraversion and agreeableness increased perceived benefits from the use of mobile applications, regardless of the cultural environment.”
From The privacy paradox – investigating discrepancies between expressed privacy concerns and actual online behavior – a systematic literature review (2017) · cites this paper as Pentina et al., 2016
Privacy concerns did not have any influence on the adoption and use of mobile applications.
“Privacy concerns did not have any influence on the adoption and use of mobile applications.”
From The privacy paradox – investigating discrepancies between expressed privacy concerns and actual online behavior – a systematic literature review (2017) · cites this paper as Pentina et al., 2016
Cites
Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J.-Y., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.879 · Cited by 82,194 · see citing works
Schwartz, S. H. (1992) · Advances in Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/s0065-2601(08)60281-6 · Cited by 14,619 · see citing works
Back-translation for cross-cultural research.
Brislin, R. W. (1970) · Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology · doi:10.1177/135910457000100301 · Cited by 14,091 · see citing works
Costello, A. B., & Osborne, J. (2005) · University of Massachusetts Amherst · doi:10.7275/jyj1-4868 · Cited by 10,297 · see citing works
A very brief measure of the Big-Five personality domains
Gosling, S. D., Rentfrow, P. J., & Swann, W. B. (2003) · Journal of Research in Personality · doi:10.1016/s0092-6566(03)00046-1 · Cited by 8,307 · see citing works
Personality and motivations associated with Facebook use
Ross, C., Orr, E. S., Sisic, M., Arseneault, J. M., Simmering, M. G., & Orr, R. R. (2009) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2008.12.024 · Cited by 1,728 · see citing works
Ryan, T., & Xenos, S. (2011) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2011.02.004 · Cited by 1,260 · see citing works
Xu, H., Luo, X. (., Carroll, J. M., & Rosson, M. B. (2011) · Decision Support Systems · doi:10.1016/j.dss.2010.11.017 · Cited by 708 · see citing works
Internet Privacy Concerns: An Integrated Conceptualization and Four Empirical Studies1
Hong, W., & Thong, J. Y. L. (2013) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.25300/misq/2013/37.1.12 · Cited by 540 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Barth, S., & de Jong, M. D. T. (2017) · Telematics and Informatics · doi:10.1016/j.tele.2017.04.013 · Cited by 798 · see citing works
Barth, S., de Jong, M. D. T., Junger, M., Hartel, P. H., & Roppelt, J. C. (2019) · Telematics and Informatics · doi:10.1016/j.tele.2019.03.003 · Cited by 219 · see citing works
“In this line, Pentina et al. (2016) found that future app use is not limited by privacy concerns.”
BackgroundWu, W., Huang, Y., & Qian, L. (2024) · Decision Support Systems · doi:10.1016/j.dss.2023.114115 · Cited by 73 · see citing works
Wang, Y., Zhu, J., Liu, R., & Jiang, Y. (2024) · International Journal of Information Management · doi:10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2024.102755 · Cited by 43 · see citing works
Exploring the privacy concerns of smartphone app users: a qualitative approach
Maseeh, H. I., Nahar, S., Jebarajakirthy, C., Ross, M., Arli, D., Das, M., Rehman, M., & Ashraf, H. A. (2023) · Marketing Intelligence & Planning · doi:10.1108/mip-11-2022-0515 · Cited by 29 · see citing works
- Authors
- Pentina, I., Zhang, L., Bata, H., & Chen, Y.
- Affiliations
- University of Toledo (US)
- Weber State University (US)
- Webber International University (US)
- Zhejiang University of Finance and Economics (CN)
- Corresponding author
- Zhang, Lixuan
- Venue
- Computers in Human Behavior
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2016-12
- Volume
- 65
- Pages
- 409-419
- ISSN
- 0747-5632 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2514259669
- Cited by
- 214
- References
- 9
- Citations by year
- 2026: 15 · 2025: 21 · 2024: 26 · 2023: 34 · 2022: 29 · 2021: 42 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 6
- FWCI
- 29.54
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Computers in Human Behavior (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Privacy, Security, and Data Protection
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Technology Adoption and User Behaviour
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › User Authentication and Security Systems
- Keywords
- privacy paradox, mobile application adoption, privacy calculus, personality traits, extraversion, agreeableness, perceived benefits, cross-cultural comparison, millennials, sensitive personal data, social needs, information needs, China–United States comparison
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
