CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 19Technology Use by Older AdultsAging and Gerontology ResearchAging, Elder Care, and Social Issues

InTouch” with seniors: Exploring adoption of a simplified interface for social communication and related socioemotional outcomes

Judges, Rebecca A., Laanemets, Clayo, Stern, Anita, Baecker, Ronald M.·2017·Computers in Human Behavior
DOI 10.1016/j.chb.2017.07.004
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.chb.2017.07.004

Cites

45 of 45 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • For participants who were not motivated to communicate with others or had difficulty using an iPad, fewer positive effects were reported.

    “However, for participants who were not motivated to communicate with others or had difficulty using an iPad, fewer positive effects were reported (Judges et al., 2017).”

    From The relationship between social media use and psychosocial outcomes in older adults: A systematic review (2024) · cites this paper as Judges et al., 2017

  • Overall, participants' experience of the qualitative interventions was positive, and the interventions were effective in reducing and managing loneliness, facilitating network building, enhancing the frequency and quality of communication with friends and family, and improving subjective wellbeing.

    “Overall, their experience was positive, and the interventions were effective in reducing and managing loneliness (Ballantyne et al., 2010), facilitating network building (Jarvis et al., 2019), enhancing the frequency and quality of communication with friends and family (Judges et al., 2017), and improving subjective wellbeing (Hemberg & Santamäki, 2018).”

    From The relationship between social media use and psychosocial outcomes in older adults: A systematic review (2024) · cites this paper as Judges et al., 2017

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

3 of the 48 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Related

Authors
Judges, R. A., Laanemets, C., Stern, A., & Baecker, R. M.
Affiliations
University of Toronto (CA)
Corresponding author
Judges, Rebecca A.
Venue
Computers in Human Behavior
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2017-10
Volume
75
Pages
912-921
ISSN
0747-5632 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1016/j.chb.2017.07.004
OpenAlex
W2730275922
Cited by
19
References
48
Citations by year
2024: 3 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 3 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1
FWCI
3.55
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
Locations
Computers in Human Behavior (publishedVersion)
Funders
University of Toronto (498579)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Demography › Technology Use by Older Adults
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology › Aging and Gerontology Research
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Aging, Elder Care, and Social Issues
Keywords
older adults, digital communication tools, technology adoption, social communication, social and emotional wellbeing, self-efficacy, text messaging, intrinsic motivation, volunteer support, technology adoption barriers

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review