Cited by 295Impact of Technology on AdolescentsCyberloafing and Workplace BehaviorEducational Outcomes and Influences

Mobile social media usage and academic performance

Open access
Giunchiglia, Fausto, Zeni, Mattia, Gobbi, Elisa, Bignotti, Enrico, Bison, Ivano·2018·Computers in Human Behavior

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.chb.2017.12.041

Cites

8 of 8 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Giunchiglia, F., Zeni, M., Gobbi, E., Bignotti, E., & Bison, I.
Affiliations
University of Trento (IT)
Corresponding author
Bignotti, Enrico
Venue
Computers in Human Behavior
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2018-05
Volume
82
Pages
177-185
ISSN
0747-5632 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2781484749
Cited by
295
References
8
Citations by year
2026: 33 · 2025: 43 · 2024: 37 · 2023: 35 · 2022: 43 · 2021: 35 · 2020: 42 · 2019: 23 · 2018: 4
FWCI
55.45
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Computers in Human Behavior (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • Institutional Research Information System (Università degli Studi di Trento) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
QROWD (732194)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Impact of Technology on Adolescents
  • Social Sciences › Demography › Cyberloafing and Workplace Behavior
  • Social Sciences › Education › Educational Outcomes and Influences
Keywords
social media use, academic performance, smartphone use, students, social media addiction, time diaries, time management

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review