Cited by 174Digital literacy in educationGender and Technology in EducationEducational Innovations and Technology

ICT Use, Digital Skills and Students’ Academic Performance: Exploring the Digital Divide

Open access
Ben Youssef, Adel, Dahmani, Mounir, Ragni, Ludovic·2022·Information

Abstract

Information and communication technologies (ICTs) are an integral part of our environment, and their uses vary across generations and among individuals. Today’s student population is made up of “digital natives” who have grown up under the ubiquitous influence of digital technologies, and for whom the use of ICT is common and whose daily activities are structured around media use. The aim of this study is to examine the impact of ICT use and digital skills on students’ academic performance and to explore the digital divide in France. Data were collected through face-to-face questionnaires administered to 1323 students enrolled in three French universities. Principal component analysis, a non-hierarchical k-means clustering approach and multilevel ordered logistic regression were used for data analysis and provide four main findings: first, poor investment in ICT affects students’ results; second, the ICT training offered by universities has little impact on students’ results; third, student performance improves with the innovative and collaborative use of ICTs; fourth, the acquisition of digital skills increases students’ academic performance. The results show that the digital divide still exists, and this raises questions about the effectiveness of education policies in France. They suggest also that organizational change in universities is essential to enable an exploitation of ICT.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3390/info13030129

Cites

65 of 65 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 66 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ben Youssef, A., Dahmani, M., & Ragni, L.
Affiliations
  • GREDEG CNRS, Université Côté d’Azur, 5 rue du 22ème BCA, 06300 Nice, France
  • University of Gafsa (TN)
  • Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR)
Venue
Information
Publisher
MDPI AG
Published
2022-03-03
Volume
13
Issue
3
Pages
129
ISSN
2078-2489 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4214928691
Cited by
174
References
66
Citations by year
2026: 34 · 2025: 42 · 2024: 36 · 2023: 51 · 2022: 11
FWCI
34.66
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Information (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • HAL (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Digital literacy in education
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender and Technology in Education
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Educational Innovations and Technology
Keywords
information and communication technologies, digital skills, academic performance, digital divide, university students, digital natives, ICT training, ICT investment, cooperative learning, educational technology, education policy, France

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review