Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 294

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 254 of the 254 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Ready to be a Silver Surfer? A Meta-analysis on the Relationship Between Chronological Age and Technology Acceptance

Hauk, Nathalie, Hüffmeier, Joachim, Krumm, Stefan·2018·Computers in Human Behavior

Abstract

Abstract This meta-analysis addresses two major issues of our time: the proliferation of technologies and the aging of society. That is, we investigate how chronological age relates to technology acceptance. Pertinent primary studies reported inconsistent results. To integrate this literature, the current meta-analysis includes 144 studies covering different types of technologies and technology users in a random effects model. In line with our theorizing, we found that age was overall negatively related to perceived ease of use (ρ = −.25), perceived usefulness (ρ = −.09), and intention to use a technology (ρ = −.07). These effects were stable over time and thus no mere cohort effects. A meta-analytic mediation model revealed that the links from age to (a) perceived usefulness and (b) intention to use were both fully mediated through perceived ease of use. Furthermore, results were moderated by type of technology, such that age-effects were only evident for technologies that do not address the prevailing needs of older adults. We conclude that age is only related to specific technology perceptions (perceived ease of use) and only for specific technologies. Thus, we challenge prevailing age stereotypes and call for an age-sensitive design of specific technologies.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.chb.2018.01.020

Cites

254 of 254 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 254 references

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Carstensen, 1991, Selectivity theory: Social activity in life-span context, Annual Review of Gerontology and Geriatrics, 11, 195
  2. Chou, 2009, On-line learning performance and computer anxiety measure for unemployed adult novices using a grey relation entropy method, Information Processing & Management, 45, 200, 10.1016/j.ipm.2008.12.001 · doi:10.1016/j.ipm.2008.12.001
  3. Kiel, 2005, The digital divide: Internet and e-mail use by the elderly, Medical Informatics & the Internet in Medicine, 30, 19, 10.1080/14639230500066900 · doi:10.1080/14639230500066900

Cited by

See all 294

Metadata

Authors
Hauk, N., Hüffmeier, J., & Krumm, S.
Venue
Computers in Human Behavior
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2018-07
Volume
84
Pages
304-319
ISSN
0747-5632 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2787517993
Cited by
294
References
254
FWCI
7.05
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
  • www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)
  • www.elsevier.com/legal/tdmrep-license (tdm)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Ready to be a Silver Surfer? A Meta-analysis on the Relationship Between Chronological Age and Technology Acceptance. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.chb.2018.01.020
The paper
Hauk, N., Hüffmeier, J., & Krumm, S. (2018). Ready to be a Silver Surfer? A Meta-analysis on the Relationship Between Chronological Age and Technology Acceptance. Computers in Human Behavior. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2018.01.020

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.