Cited by 76Technology Adoption and User BehaviourAI in Service InteractionsConsumer Retail Behavior Studies

A multi-method approach to examining consumer intentions to use smart retail technology

Open access
Fazal-e-Hasan, Syed Muhammad, Amrollahi, Alireza, Mortimer, Gary, Adapa, Sujana, Balaji, M S·2021·Computers in Human Behavior

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.chb.2020.106622

Cites

8 of 8 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Fazal-e-Hasan, S. M., Amrollahi, A., Mortimer, G., Adapa, S., & Balaji, M. S.
Affiliations
  • Queensland University of Technology (AU)
  • University of New England (AU)
  • University of Nottingham Ningbo China (CN)
Corresponding author
Mortimer, Gary
Venue
Computers in Human Behavior
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2021-04
Volume
117
Pages
106622
ISSN
0747-5632 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3098208703
Cited by
76
References
8
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 19 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 3
FWCI
8.19
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Computers in Human Behavior (publishedVersion)
  • QUT ePrints (Queensland University of Technology) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • RUNE (Research UNE) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Technology Adoption and User Behaviour
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › AI in Service Interactions
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Marketing › Consumer Retail Behavior Studies
Keywords
technology adoption, consumer intention to use, perceived novelty, perceived efficacy, perceived compatibility, risk perception, shopping value, in-store technology, adoption strategies, target customers

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review