Cited by 139Child Development and Digital TechnologyChild and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional DevelopmentImpact of Technology on Adolescents

Tantrums, toddlers and technology: Temperament, media emotion regulation, and problematic media use in early childhood

Open access
Coyne, Sarah M., Shawcroft, Jane, Gale, Megan, Gentile, Douglas A., Etherington, Jordan T., Holmgren, Hailey, Stockdale, Laura·2021·Computers in Human Behavior

Abstract

Parents regularly use media to help regulate their child's difficult emotions, particularly for those with a more difficult temperament. However, no research has examined how this may be related to the development of problematic (or addictive-like) media use in early childhood. The purpose of the study was to examine associations between temperament, parental media emotion regulation, and problematic media use in young children, using both questionnaires and observational data. Participants included 269 toddlers (2-3 years old) and their parents, who completed several observational tasks and questionnaires. Analyses revealed that higher levels of media emotion regulation was associated with more problematic media use and more extreme emotions when media was removed in toddlers. Additionally, temperament (specifically negative affect and surgency) was related to problematic media and extreme emotions and was mediated by media emotion regulation. Parents should avoid using media as a primary way of regulating their children's emotions as this may be related to the development of problematic media strategies during infancy.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.chb.2021.106762

Cites

50 of 50 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The ubiquity of access to digital media allows it to become an easy distraction during times of emotional distress, providing emotional relief and subsequently reinforcing digital media engagement.

    “The ubiquity of access to digital media allows it to become an easy distraction during times of emotional distress, providing emotional relief and subsequently reinforcing digital media engagement.19”

    From Digital Ecosystems, Children, and Adolescents: Technical Report (2026) · cites this paper as [19]

    The Media Emotion Regulation section describes parents using phones to soothe distressed infants and toddlers, and the Problematic Media Use section proposes that this may foster reliance on media for coping. The Discussion reports an association with concurrent problematic media use, but the paper does not establish that ubiquitous access causes emotional relief and reinforces engagement across digital-media users generally. (LLM, conf=0.87)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Design features such as auto-play, infinite scrolling, and personalized algorithmic recommendations on social media platforms are digitally engineered to prolong device use and make disengagement more difficult, particularly for children.

    “Design features, such as auto-play, infinite scrolling, and personalized algorithmic recommendations on social media platforms are digitally engineered to both prolong device use and make disengagement from devices more difficult,19 particularly for children, who may be developing their ability to control impulses.”

    From Digital Ecosystems, Children, and Adolescents: Technical Report (2026) · cites this paper as [19]

    The Problematic Media Use section discusses excessive use and children’s self-regulation, but not platform design features. Searches for auto-play, infinite scrolling, algorithmic recommendations, and engineered difficulty disengaging found no passage addressing the claim. Page numbers were not available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.76)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Domoff SE, Borgen AL, Foley RP, & Maffett A (2019a). Excessive use of mobile devices and children’s physical health. Human Behavior and Emerging Technologies, 1(2), 169– 175.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Coyne, S. M., Shawcroft, J., Gale, M., Gentile, D. A., Etherington, J. T., Holmgren, H., & Stockdale, L.
Affiliations
  • Brigham Young University (US)
  • Iowa State University (US)
Corresponding author
Coyne, Sarah M.
Venue
Computers in Human Behavior
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2021-07
Volume
120
Pages
106762
ISSN
0747-5632 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3133784500
Cited by
139
References
50
Citations by year
2026: 40 · 2025: 27 · 2024: 30 · 2023: 23 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 3
FWCI
31.65
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Computers in Human Behavior (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion)
Funders
National Institutes of Health
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Child Development and Digital Technology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Impact of Technology on Adolescents
Keywords
problematic media use, toddler temperament, negative affect, surgency, parental media use, early childhood, screen time, emotion regulation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review