The DOI matches its Crossref record; 49 of the 49 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Development of the “Scale for the assessment of non-experts’ AI literacy” – An exploratory factor analysis
Open accessAbstract
Artificial Intelligence competencies will become increasingly important in the near future. Therefore, it is essential that the AI literacy of individuals can be assessed in a valid and reliable way. This study presents the development of the “Scale for the assessment of non-experts' AI literacy” (SNAIL). An existing AI literacy item set was distributed as an online questionnaire to a heterogeneous group of non-experts (i.e., individuals without a formal AI or computer science education). Based on the data collected, an exploratory factor analysis was conducted to investigate the underlying latent factor structure. The results indicated that a three-factor model had the best model fit. The individual factors reflected AI competencies in the areas of “Technical Understanding”, “Critical Appraisal”, and “Practical Application”. In addition, eight items from the original questionnaire were deleted based on high intercorrelations and low communalities to reduce the length of the questionnaire. The final SNAIL-questionnaire consists of 31 items that can be used to assess the AI literacy of individual non-experts or specific groups and is also designed to enable the evaluation of AI literacy courses’ teaching effectiveness.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Laupichler et al. (2023), on the other hand, aimed to address both technical and ethical dimensions in a balanced way in their scale focusing on artificial intelligence literacy.”
From Development of the Artificial Intelligence Perception and Attitude Scale (AIPAS) (2025) · cites this paper as Laupichler et al. (2023)
In the citing paper
“While Laupichler et al.'s (2023) study addresses both technical and ethical dimensions of AI literacy, the AIPAS examines attitudes towards the use of AI tools as well as ethical perceptions.”
From Development of the Artificial Intelligence Perception and Attitude Scale (AIPAS) (2025) · cites this paper as Laupichler et al.'s (2023)
In the citing paper
“The items generated in the Delphi study were presented to a sample of more than 400 participants and, subsequently, analyzed through an exploratory factor analysis that found three AI-literacy factors: technical understanding, critical appraisal, and practical application [27].”
From Evaluating AI Courses: A Valid and Reliable Instrument for Assessing Artificial-Intelligence Learning through Comparative Self-Assessment (2023) · cites this paper as [27]
In the citing paper
“In this study, the 'scale for the assessment of non-experts' AI literacy' (SNAIL), which was developed by Laupichler et al. [27], was used, because it was validated on a sufficiently large sample and the items can be adapted particularly well for course evaluation.”
From Evaluating AI Courses: A Valid and Reliable Instrument for Assessing Artificial-Intelligence Learning through Comparative Self-Assessment (2023) · cites this paper as [27]
In the citing paper
“SNAIL45 was constructed on an elaborate Delphi study63, it has been revalidated in another three studies49–51 including one with comparative self-assessment gains49, it is one of the few scales with evidence of reliability and responsiveness, and it demonstrated good structural validity and internal consistency, which makes it a promising instrument.”
From A systematic review of AI literacy scales (2024) · cites this paper as [45]
In the citing paper
“SNAIL45 was constructed on an elaborate Delphi study63, it has been revalidated in another three studies49–51 including one with comparative self-assessment gains49, it is one of the few scales with evidence of reliability and responsiveness, and it demonstrated good structural validity and internal consistency, which makes it a promising instrument.”
From A systematic review of AI literacy scales (2024) · cites this paper as [45]
In the citing paper
“SNAIL45 was constructed on an elaborate Delphi study63, it has been revalidated in another three studies49–51 including one with comparative self-assessment gains49, it is one of the few scales with evidence of reliability and responsiveness, and it demonstrated good structural validity and internal consistency, which makes it a promising instrument.”
From A systematic review of AI literacy scales (2024) · cites this paper as [45]
In the citing paper
“GSE-6AI30, MAIRS-MC43, and SNAIL45 have been validated specifically for medical students, which makes them the instruments of choice if medical students are to be assessed.”
From A systematic review of AI literacy scales (2024) · cites this paper as [45]
In the citing paper
“SNAIL45 was constructed on an elaborate Delphi study63, it has been revalidated in another three studies49–51 including one with comparative self-assessment gains49, it is one of the few scales with evidence of reliability and responsiveness, and it demonstrated good structural validity and internal consistency, which makes it a promising instrument.”
From A systematic review of AI literacy scales (2024) · cites this paper as [45]
In the citing paper
“SNAIL45 was constructed on an elaborate Delphi study63, it has been revalidated in another three studies49–51 including one with comparative self-assessment gains49, it is one of the few scales with evidence of reliability and responsiveness, and it demonstrated good structural validity and internal consistency, which makes it a promising instrument.”
From A systematic review of AI literacy scales (2024) · cites this paper as [45]
In the citing paper
“AI literacy encompasses not only technical knowledge but also the ability to critically evaluate the ethical implications and societal impacts of AI systems (Carolus et al. 2023;Laupichler et al. 2023;Long and Magerko 2020;Ng et al. 2024;Touretzky et al. 2019;Wang et al. 2023).”
From Fostering AI Literacy in Undergraduates: A ChatGPT Workshop Case Study (2025) · cites this paper as Laupichler et al. 2023
In the citing paper
“The validity of the self-report measurement instruments for AI literacy [11,12,14,15] has only been tested regarding their factorial structure.”
From Meta AI literacy scale: Further validation and development of a short version (2024) · cites this paper as [12]
In the citing paper
“Existing scales, such as those developed by Laupichler et al. [3,4], provide robust measures of general AI literacy, but they lack domain-specific items relevant to nursing practice and were validated in Western educational contexts.”
From Development and psychometric validation of the Thai AI Literacy Scale for Nursing Students in Thailand: a methodological study (2026) · cites this paper as [3]
In the citing paper
“studies and scales have been criticized for primarily focusing on individuals’ basic knowledge of AI and skills in their applications”
From Assessment of AI ethical reflection: the development and validation of the AI ethical reflection scale (AIERS) for university students (2025) · cites this paper as Laupichler et al., 2023
Citations
Cites
An Index of Factorial Simplicity
Kaiser, H. F. (1974) · Psychometrika · doi:10.1007/bf02291575 · Cited by 14,898
The Scree Test For The Number Of Factors
Cattell, R. B. (1966) · Multivariate Behavioral Research · doi:10.1207/s15327906mbr0102_10 · Cited by 13,554
Amazon's Mechanical Turk: A New Source of Inexpensive, Yet High-Quality, Data?
Buhrmester, M., Kwang, T., & Gosling, S. D. (2011) · Perspectives on Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/1745691610393980 · Cited by 9,996
EQS : structural equations program manual
Bentler, P. M. (1989) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 9,669
A Rationale and Test for the Number of Factors in Factor Analysis
Horn, J. L. (1965) · Psychometrika · doi:10.1007/bf02289447 · Cited by 8,965
On the generalized distance in statistics
Mahalanobis, P. C. (1936) · DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) · Cited by 6,068
Measures of Multivariate Skewness and Kurtosis with Applications
Mardia, K. V. (1970) · Biometrika · doi:10.1093/biomet/57.3.519 · Cited by 5,125
Identifying careless responses in survey data.
Meade, A. W., & Craig, S. B. (2012) · Psychological Methods · doi:10.1037/a0028085 · Cited by 3,865
Klemelä, J. (2018) · Wiley series in probability and statistics · doi:10.1002/9781119409137.ch4 · Cited by 3,817
A First Course in Factor Analysis
Price, B., Comrey, A. L., & Lee, H. B. (1993) · Technometrics · doi:10.1080/00401706.1993.10485363 · Cited by 3,512
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- Tabachnik, 2019, Vol. 7
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 101–200 of 272
Fostering AI Literacy in Undergraduates: A ChatGPT Workshop Case Study
Archambault, S. G., Murph, N. L., & Ramachandran, S. (2025) · Library Trends · doi:10.1353/lib.2025.a968491 · Cited by 5
Artificial Intelligence Literacy Education: A Scoping Literature Review from 2020–2024
Xia, L. (2025) · 2025 5th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Education (ICAIE) · doi:10.1109/icaie64856.2025.11158088 · Cited by 7
Generative AI, cognitive load, and supply chain risk perception: the moderating role of AI literacy
Li, R., Wu, J., Niu, N., & Song, Y. (2025) · International Journal of Logistics Research and Applications · doi:10.1080/13675567.2025.2584305 · Cited by 6
Zhang, Y., & Kang, B. (2026) · BMC Psychology · doi:10.1186/s40359-026-04047-x · Cited by 9
Boolzen, C., Kühn, J., Flegr, S., Rott, E.-M., Stausberg, N., & Küchemann, S. (2026) · Artificial Intelligence Review · doi:10.1007/s10462-026-11665-9 · Cited by 13
ÇOBAN, N., & Beydağ, K. D. (2025) · BMC Nursing · doi:10.1186/s12912-025-04248-6 · Cited by 4
How to Assess AI Literacy: Misalignment Between Self-Reported and Objective-Based Measures
Zhang, S. B., Xiao, R., Botelho, A. F., Liao, G., Chiu, T. K. F., Stamper, J. C., & Koedinger, K. R. (2026) · International Conference on Learning Analytics and Knowledge (LAK) · doi:10.1145/3785022.3785088 · Cited by 7
Yılmaz, F. G. K., Olpak, Y. Z., & Yılmaz, R. (2026) · Journal of Research on Technology in Education · doi:10.1080/15391523.2026.2683793 · Cited by 4
Wang, R., Li, C., Tan, Y., Liu, S., & Cao, L. (2025) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.5735717 · Cited by 4
Riviezzo, A., Mason, M. C., Zamparo, G., & Napolitano, M. R. (2025) · The Journal of Technology Transfer · doi:10.1007/s10961-025-10197-8 · Cited by 4
Helm, G., & Hesse, F. (2025) · Journal of Writing Research · doi:10.17239/jowr-2025.17.01.01 · Cited by 8
Pozsonyi, E., Molnar, T., & Racsko, R. (2025) · Educational Media International · doi:10.1080/09523987.2025.2588529 · Cited by 3
Kong, S. C., & Hou, C. (2025) · Computers and Education Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1016/j.caeai.2025.100503 · Cited by 10
Yu, Y., Yetim, M. A., & Cocieru, O. C. (2025) · International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1080/10447318.2025.2588652 · Cited by 6
Developing a Nursing Research Education Agent Using Knowledge Graphs and Large Language Models
Zeng, Y., Xie, H., Zhou, X., Xu, C., Jiang, Y., & Lau, S. T. (2026) · Nurse Educator · doi:10.1097/nne.0000000000002105 · Cited by 3
Erdoğan, F., Tutak, T., & Polat, M. (2026) · Journal of Baltic Science Education · doi:10.33225/jbse/26.25.22 · Cited by 6
Assessing Community Vitality among Chinese and Nepali Communities in India
Samanta, P., Chattopadhyay, S., & Biswas, A. (2025) · Journal of International Migration and Integration / Revue de l integration et de la migration internationale · doi:10.1007/s12134-025-01284-8 · Cited by 3
Adaptation of Artificial Intelligence Literacy Scale: Latent Profile Analysis
Kırksekiz, A., Yıldız, M., Kıyıcı, M., & Yıldız, M. (2024) · Sakarya University Journal of Education · doi:10.19126/suje.1479294 · Cited by 5
The System Admin's Perspective: A Discussion on AI in Education with LMS Admins
Simbeck, K., Schauer, S., & Fernsel, L. (2024) · International Conference on Information Technology Based Higher Education and Training (ITHET) · doi:10.1109/ithet61869.2024.10837664 · Cited by 4
Development of the Artificial Intelligence Perception and Attitude Scale (AIPAS)
Dinler, H. (2025) · Bartın University Journal of Faculty of Education · doi:10.14686/buefad.1602673 · Cited by 4
Integrating generative AI tools in higher education
Emre, İ. E. (2025) · American Journal of STEM Education · doi:10.32674/2gxk8g16 · Cited by 2
AKYÜREK, M. İ. (2025) · Gazi Üniversitesi Gazi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi · doi:10.17152/gefad.1469370 · Cited by 2
Social Work Practice in the Era of Artificial Intelligence: Social Workers’ Voices from South Asia
Pandya, S. P. (2025) · Social Work · doi:10.1093/sw/swaf050 · Cited by 2
Aksoy, M., Aksoy, D. A., Polat, E., Hopcan, S., & Bush, A. (2026) · European Journal of Education · doi:10.1111/ejed.70454 · Cited by 6
Zhao, J. (2026) · Current Psychology · doi:10.1007/s12144-025-08631-z · Cited by 2
On the Measurement of AI Literacy Among Students in Higher Education: A Scoping Review
Jones, J. (2026) · International Journal of AI in Pedagogy Innovation and Learning Futures · doi:10.46787/ijaipil.v2026i1.6920 · Cited by 7
Weber, J., & Goldkind, L. (2026) · Social Work Education · doi:10.1080/02615479.2026.2635471 · Cited by 2
Camacho, X. G. O., & Martínez, S. J. R. (2026) · Information · doi:10.3390/info17060555 · Cited by 2
Liu, Q., Miao, W., Li, J., & Lei, Y. (2026) · Behavioral Sciences · doi:10.3390/bs16071110 · Cited by 2
Exploring AI and Dialogic Education Outcomes From a Learning Sciences Perspective
Anapey, G. M. (2024) · Advances in IT standards and standardization research (AISSR) book series/Advances in IT standards and standardization research series · doi:10.4018/978-1-6684-9962-7.ch008 · Cited by 3
Where Is the Environment in AI Ethics? Integrating Ecoliteracy Into AI Literacy
Inclezan, D., & Prádanos, L. I. (2025) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-98462-4_49 · Cited by 2
Gong, L., Chen, J., & Ye, M. (2025) · ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition · doi:10.18260/1-2--56237 · Cited by 2
AI Literacy for Legal AI Systems: a Practical Approach
Gültekin-Várkonyi, G. (2025) · Iustum Aequum Salutare · doi:10.69695/ias.2025.4.01 · Cited by 6
Making a Case for Artificial Intelligence Literacy Skills for School-Age Children
Kleinknecht, E., Blumberg, F. C., & Flynn, R. M. (2024) · Integrated science · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-60713-4_13 · Cited by 3
Abunaser, F. M., Hamd, M. M., Bani-Oraba, A. M. N., Hamed, O., Alshiyab, M. Q. M., & Shebani, Z. (2025) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su17157092 · Cited by 4
Eğitimde Yapay Zekâ Kullanımına İlişkin Geliştirilen ve Uyarlanan Ölçeklerin İncelenmesi
Yılmaz, N., & Korkmaz, Ö. (2025) · Abant İzzet Baysal Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi · doi:10.17240/aibuefd.2025..-1563316 · Cited by 2
Cengiz, E., & YALÇINKAYA, B. (2025) · Türk Kütüphaneciliği · doi:10.24146/tk.1674520 · Cited by 1
Prompt Assessment for Human-AI Interaction: Intent, Complexity & Lay Perceptions
Velázquez, M. P., Bobrowicz-Campos, V., & Arriaga, P. (2025) · Journal of Machine Intelligence and Data Science · doi:10.11159/jmids.2025.008 · Cited by 1
Özer, T., & Eker, H. S. (2025) · Bilgisayar bilimleri ve mühendisliği dergisi. · doi:10.54525/bbmd.1763200 · Cited by 1
Critical or Confident? AI Literacy and Student–AI Collaboration in Higher Education
Göhler, V. (2025) · Conference on Information Technology Education · doi:10.1145/3769694.3771145 · Cited by 4
AI literacy: ai4Ev, a guide for adults non-technical learners
Falco, M. (2026) · Iran Journal of Computer Science · doi:10.1007/s42044-025-00377-y · Cited by 2
Künstliche Intelligenz in der Hochschulbildung
Winterlich, J., & Lohse, M. (2025) · Informatik-Spektrum · doi:10.1007/s00287-025-01598-y · Cited by 1
Offiong, U. P., Szopik‐Depczyńska, K., & Cheba, K. (2026) · Digital Policy Regulation and Governance · doi:10.1108/dprg-09-2025-0316 · Cited by 1
Kong, S. C., & Zhu, J. (2026) · Computers and Education Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1016/j.caeai.2026.100555 · Cited by 2
Liu, H., Hamid, A. H. A., & Alias, B. S. (2026) · Multidisciplinary Reviews · doi:10.31893/multirev.2026381 · Cited by 2
Vuoriainen, A., Räty, P., Heilala, V., Rikala, J., Kettunen, L., & Hämäläinen, R. (2026) · Futures · doi:10.1016/j.futures.2026.103808 · Cited by 1
Scheibenzuber, C., Chernikova, O., Vejvoda, J., Sailer, M., & Fischer, F. (2026) · British Journal of Educational Technology · doi:10.1111/bjet.70065 · Cited by 2
Assessing AI Literacy at University Entry: A Mixed-Item Diagnostic Instrument
Iovine, I. (2026) · CHI Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI EA) · doi:10.1145/3772363.3798666 · Cited by 1
Rechtskommunikation im Umbruch
Mundorf, M. (2026) · Studien zu Fach, Sprache und Kultur · doi:10.57088/978-3-7329-8690-3_2 · Cited by 1
Olea, F. E. P., & Villacís-Macías, C. D. (2026) · Frontiers in Education · doi:10.3389/feduc.2026.1791361 · Cited by 3
Karaçay, P., Yaşar, Ö., Göktaş, P., & Küçükkaya, A. (2026) · BMC Nursing · doi:10.1186/s12912-026-04832-4 · Cited by 1
Incorporating AI literacy into a university professional communication English class
Ting, A. (2026) · Journal of English for Academic Purposes · doi:10.1016/j.jeap.2026.101711 · Cited by 1
Assessment of Artificial Intelligence Attitudes, Literacy, and Self‐Efficacy in Nursing Students
Duran, S., & ÖZ, Y. C. (2026) · Perspectives In Psychiatric Care · doi:10.1155/ppc/1496081 · Cited by 1
Si, J. (2026) · Medical Education Online · doi:10.1080/10872981.2026.2696610 · Cited by 1
Jin, S., Cheng, J., Zhang, A., Lei, Z., & Liu, X. (2026) · Frontiers in Education · doi:10.3389/feduc.2026.1886090 · Cited by 2
Karataş, F., Gür, R., Eriçok, B., BAŞARIR, F., & TANRIKULU, L. (2026) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2026.105700 · Cited by 1
崔晓慧, & Khan, T. J. (2026) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2026.1896371 · Cited by 1
The Dizzy Spells of AI: Enacting Intellectual Independence in AI Literacy and AI-Mediated Learning
Hachem, H., Primus, F., Linden, K., Heintz, F., & Wiggberg, M. (2026) · Human-Centric Intelligent Systems · doi:10.1007/s44230-026-00168-z · Cited by 2
Hefter, M. H., Paaßen, B., & Berthold, K. (2026) · AI in Education · doi:10.3390/aieduc2030027 · Cited by 1
Aldemir, T., Biçer, A., Kılınç, S., Moon, J., & Kwok, M. (2026) · Cogent Education · doi:10.1080/2331186x.2026.2721038 · Cited by 2
GARİP, S. (2025) · Akademik Açı · doi:10.59597/akademikaci.1631306 · Cited by 1
Digital Transformation Challenges in the Agricultural Industry at Indonesian Agri-Business Company
Bagaskara, M. I. P., & Noviaristanti, S. (2024) · Studies in big data · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-73632-2_8
How Entrepreneurs Learn About Artificial Intelligence by Using an Analogue Card Game
Freese, M., Zürn, B., & Wittenzellner, H. (2025) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-86555-8_17
Bachmann, P., Griesser, S., Mohr, S., Rast, V., Stutz, N., & Zeder, R. (2025) · Europäische Kulturen in der Wirtschaftskommunikation · doi:10.1007/978-3-658-47591-8_9
Bibliometric Analysis of Artificial Intelligence Literacy Research Status Based on Clustering
Wu, Y., Yang, W., Ji, T., Luo, Y., Lin, Y., Yang, Y., & Liu, Y. (2025) · International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Big Data (ICAIBD) · doi:10.1109/icaibd64986.2025.11081974
Şengül, B. C., Türkyılmaz, C. A., YILDIRIM, Y. O., & Pirtini, S. (2025) · R&S - Research Studies Anatolia Journal · doi:10.33723/rs.1708096
Supporting AI Learning with AI-Embodied Educational Robotics
Eguchi, A. (2025) · Lecture notes in networks and systems · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-98762-5_18
Interaction Trace Analysis to Identify AI Competencies: Preliminary Results from a Pilot Project
Marques, D., & Morandini, M. (2025) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-032-05002-1_32
Galván-Cabello, M. F., Tereucán-Angulo, J., Troncoso-Tejada, G., Arellano-Silva, D., Sánchez-Gallegos, V., & Nogués-Solano, I. (2025) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su17198597
Huang, L., Wu, T. Y., Tsai, T., & Cheung, W. (2025) · Proceedings of the Association for Information Science and Technology · doi:10.1002/pra2.1442
Nodarse, M. H., Torres, W. F., de León, D. P., Villarroel, V., & Ramos, A. R. L. (2025) · Salud Ciencia y Tecnología · doi:10.56294/saludcyt20252359 · Cited by 2
Arita, C. S., & Ali, M. M. (2026) · International Conference on ICT for Smart Society (ICISS) · doi:10.1109/iciss71466.2026.11715040
Yapay Zekâ Okuryazarlığı Ölçeği: Türkçeye Uyarlama Çalışması
Gökoğlu, S., Erdoğdu, F., & Altun, E. (2025) · Anadolu Journal Of Educational Sciences International · doi:10.18039/ajesi.1699897
Development and Validation of an AI Literacy Diagnostic Tool for Middle School Students
Chung, K., Kim, S., Lee, J., Lee, C., Noh, H., Kwon, Y., & Kim, H. (2025) · International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1080/10447318.2025.2595309
Introduction: Implementation of Artificial Intelligence for Improving Healthcare
Hübner, U. H., Rubeis, G., Delaney, C. W., & Ball, M. J. (2026) · Health informatics · doi:10.1007/978-3-032-11938-4_1
Wallace, J. J., Perino, J., & Katzarska-Miller, I. I. (2026) · Advances in computational intelligence and robotics book series · doi:10.4018/979-8-3373-3000-6.ch004 · Cited by 1
AI Literacy in Portuguese-Speaking Contexts: Validation of a Comprehensive Assessment Tool
Arantes, L., Sousa, B., & Santos, J. D. (2026) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-99147-9_16
Starkova, V., & Howley, I. K. (2026) · ACM International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces (IUI) · doi:10.1145/3742413.3789153
Yoo, N., & Jang, S. H. (2026) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.6361104
Khasawneh, Y. J. A., Khasawneh, N. A. S., & Khasawneh, M. A. S. (2026) · Journal of Computer Assisted Learning · doi:10.1002/jcal.70216
A qualitative exploration of AI literacy development in Saudi media education
Mansoor, H. M. H., Alquaary, M. A., Aisha, F., & Alquaary, A. (2026) · Discover Education · doi:10.1007/s44217-026-01356-6 · Cited by 2
Xu, Y., Sun, C., & Cheng, W. (2026) · Research Square · doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-8924262/v1
A standardization and automatable process for body language data studyPreprint
Guillaume, R., Pailhès, J., Gruhier, E., Lou, R., & Baudin, Y. (2026) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.6462380
Sarı, B. (2026) · Anadolu Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi · doi:10.18037/ausbd.1735626
Los modernos odiseos: la literacidad en IA como factor en la apropiación tecnológica
Ulloa, E. M., & Flores, J. I. L. (2025) · doi:10.61728/ae20253752
Köse, N. (2026) · Türk Eğitim Bilimleri Dergisi · doi:10.37217/tebd.1782832 · Cited by 1
Birhanu, E. T., Tefera, G. W., Tilwani, S. A., Terefe, B., & Shiferaw, Y. G. (2026) · Discover Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1007/s44163-026-01149-8 · Cited by 1
Tsioukas, K., & Κώστας, Α. (2026) · Advances in computational intelligence and robotics book series · doi:10.4018/407456
Park, J., Ryu, H. B., & Kim, J. (2026) · The Journal of Korean Association of Computer Education · doi:10.32431/kace.2026.29.3.001
Kılıç, S. (2026) · Uluslararası Iktisadi ve Idari Incelemeler Dergisi · doi:10.18092/ulikidince.1849363
Validation of the Turkish Version of the ChatGPT Literacy Scale
Bulut, A., Gökhan, A. B. A., Mutlu, C., Guven‐Uslu, P., & Çalışkan, R. E. (2026) · Measurement Interdisciplinary Research and Perspectives · doi:10.1080/15366367.2026.2665784
Learning and using AI: how critical awareness shapes attitudes and engagement
Kim, S., & Yoon, H. J. (2026) · European journal of training and development · doi:10.1108/ejtd-12-2025-0293
Lehren und Lernen über Künstliche Intelligenz
Schlemmer, D., Bauer, K., Canz, M., Sänger, V., Schmidt, C., & Sedlmeier, T. (2026) · MedienPädagogik Zeitschrift für Theorie und Praxis der Medienbildung · doi:10.21240/mpaed/00/2026.05.10.x
Responsible AI integration in higher education: drivers and effects in the context of Bangladesh
Akter, N., Nepo, M. N. I., Chowdhury, M. S., Sadique, M. S., Haque, M. E., Bhuiyan, T., & Hasan, M. S. (2026) · International Journal of Information and Learning Technology · doi:10.1108/ijilt-09-2025-0268 · Cited by 1
Reimagining Continuous Professional Development for Physicians in the Age of Artificial Intelligence
Barry, J. S., & McAdams, R. M. (2026) · Journal of Continuing Education in the Health Professions · doi:10.1097/ceh.0000000000000644
AI Literacy as a Mediator Between Education Climate and Learning Agency in Nursing Students
Zeng, F., Liu, Q., Zhang, Y., Jiang, N., Ning, M., & Yu, Q. (2026) · Nursing Education Perspectives · doi:10.1097/01.nep.0000000000001547
Bipasha, N. J., Bhuyan, M. M., & Muhammad, M.-U.-I. (2026) · IFLA Journal · doi:10.1177/03400352261457340 · Cited by 1
Mikula, L. (2026) · Education Journal · doi:10.11648/j.edu.20261503.12
Alhilfi, A. H. H., Mohammed, A. K., Jasim, Z. A., Almatwari, A. A. S., Hussein, S. A.-D. A., & Alyousuf, A. N. J. (2026) · Advances in computational intelligence and robotics book series · doi:10.4018/979-8-3373-7240-2.ch007
Metadata
- Authors
- Laupichler, M. C., Aster, A., Haverkamp, N., & Raupach, T.
- Affiliations
- University Hospital Bonn (DE)
- University of Bonn (DE)
- Corresponding author
- Laupichler, Matthias Carl
- Venue
- Computers in Human Behavior Reports
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2023-12
- Volume
- 12
- Pages
- 100338
- ISSN
- 2451-9588 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4387082112
- Semantic Scholar
- a79d835c8af0fd54cddaf501cc28db21a298cb47
- Cited by
- 269
- References
- 49
- Citations by year
- 2026: 135 · 2025: 96 · 2024: 35 · 2023: 3
- FWCI
- 63.15
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Computers in Human Behavior Reports (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- bonndoc (University of Bonn) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Funders
- Rheinische Friedrich-Wilhelms-Universität Bonn
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Education › Digital literacy in education
- Social Sciences › Education › Artificial Intelligence in Education
- Social Sciences › Library and Information Sciences › Library Science and Information Literacy
- Keywords
- AI literacy, non-experts, AI literacy assessment, questionnaire development, factor structure, technical understanding, critical appraisal, practical application, teaching effectiveness evaluation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
