Cited by 184Click Chemistry and ApplicationsComputational Drug Discovery MethodsAdvanced Proteomics Techniques and Applications

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 96 of the 96 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

How Chemoproteomics Can Enable Drug Discovery and Development

Open access

Abstract

Creating first-in-class medications to treat human disease is an extremely challenging endeavor. While genome sequencing and genetics are making direct connections between mutations and human disorders at an unprecedented rate, matching molecular targets with a suitable therapeutic indication must ultimately be achieved by pharmacology. Here, we discuss how the integration of chemical proteomic platforms (such as activity-based protein profiling) into the earliest stages of the drug discovery process has the potential to greatly expand the scope of proteins that can be pharmacologically evaluated in living systems, and, through doing so, promote the identification and prioritization of new therapeutic targets.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.chembiol.2012.01.001

Cites

96 of 96 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

1 retracted

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 96 references

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 101–184 of 184

Metadata

Authors
Moellering, R. E., & Cravatt, B. F.
Affiliations
Scripps Research Institute (US)
Corresponding author
Cravatt, Benjamin F.
Venue
Chemistry & Biology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2012-01
Volume
19
Issue
1
Pages
11-22
ISSN
1074-5521 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2030953184
Cited by
182
References
96
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 22 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 21 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 16 · 2015: 15 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 14 · 2012: 7
FWCI
6.47
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Chemistry & Biology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • Howard Hughes Medical Institute
  • Cancer Research Institute
  • Damon Runyon Cancer Research Foundation
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Institute on Drug Abuse (DA025285, R01DA025285)
  • National Cancer Institute (R01CA132630, CA-087660, R37CA087660, R01CA087660, CA132630)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Organic Chemistry › Click Chemistry and Applications
  • Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Drug Discovery › Computational Drug Discovery Methods
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Spectroscopy › Advanced Proteomics Techniques and Applications
Keywords
chemoproteomics, drug discovery, drug development, activity-based protein profiling, drug target identification, target prioritization, first-in-class drugs
MeSH terms
Enzymes, Humans, Serine Proteinase Inhibitors, Genome, Human, Proteomics, Metabolic Networks and Pathways, Small Molecule Libraries, Drug Discovery

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review