Cited by 25Protein Degradation and InhibitorsAdvanced Proteomics Techniques and ApplicationsUbiquitin and proteasome pathways

Degradome analysis to identify direct protein substrates of small-molecule degraders

Open access
Jochem, Marco, Schrempf, Anna, Wagner, Lina-Marie, Segal, Dmitri, Cisneros, Jose, Ng, Amanda, Winter, Georg E., Krijgsveld, Jeroen·2025·Cell Chemical Biology

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Targeted protein degradation (TPD) has emerged as a powerful strategy to selectively eliminate cellular proteins using small-molecule degraders, offering therapeutic promise for targeting proteins that are otherwise undruggable. However, a remaining challenge is to unambiguously identify primary TPD targets that are distinct from secondary downstream effects in the proteome. Here we introduce an approach for selective analysis of protein degradation by mass spectrometry (DegMS) at proteomic scale, which derives its specificity from the exclusion of confounding effects of altered transcription and translation induced by target depletion. We show that the approach efficiently operates at the timescale of TPD (hours) and we demonstrate its utility by analyzing the cyclin K degraders dCeMM2 and dCeMM4, which induce widespread transcriptional downregulation, and the GSPT1 degrader CC-885, an inhibitor of protein translation. Additionally, we apply DegMS to characterize a previously uncharacterized degrader, and identify the zinc-finger protein FIZ1 as a degraded target.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.chembiol.2024.10.007

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Authors
Jochem, M., Schrempf, A., Wagner, L.-M., Segal, D., Cisneros, J., Ng, A., Winter, G. E., & Krijgsveld, J.
Affiliations
  • German Cancer Research Center (DE)
  • Austrian Academy of Sciences (AT)
Corresponding author
Krijgsveld, Jeroen
Venue
Cell Chemical Biology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2025-01
Volume
32
Issue
1
Pages
192-200.e6
ISSN
  • 2451-9448 (ISSN-L)
  • 2451-9456
OpenAlex
W4404299406
Cited by
25
References
5
Citations by year
2026: 13 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 2
FWCI
3.40
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Cell chemical biology (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Horizon 2020
  • German Cancer Aid (70114190)
  • HORIZON EUROPE European Research Council (851478)
  • Austrian Science Fund
  • European Research Council
  • Pfizer
  • Austrian Academy of Sciences (P7909, P32125)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Degradation and Inhibitors
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Spectroscopy › Advanced Proteomics Techniques and Applications
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Ubiquitin and proteasome pathways
Keywords
targeted protein degradation, small-molecule degraders, GSPT1, zinc finger proteins, transcriptional downregulation, protein synthesis inhibition, undruggable proteins
MeSH terms
Humans, Mass Spectrometry, Substrate Specificity, Proteomics, Small Molecule Libraries, Proteolysis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review