The DOI matches its Crossref record; 27 of the 27 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Comparison of EDTA and EDDS as potential soil amendments for enhanced phytoextraction of heavy metals
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Phytoremediation: A Novel Strategy for the Removal of Toxic Metals from the Environment Using Plants
Salt, D. E., Blaylock, M., Kumar, N. P. B. A., Dushenkov, V., Ensley, B. D., Chet, I., & Raskin, I. (1995) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/nbt0595-468 · Cited by 2,203
Phytoextraction: The Use of Plants To Remove Heavy Metals from Soils
Kumar, P. B. A. N., Dushenkov, V., Motto, H., & Raskin, I. (1995) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/es00005a014 · Cited by 1,439
Raven, P. H., Evert, R. F., & Eichhorn, S. E. (1966) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 873
BAKER, A. J. M., REEVES, R. D., & HAJAR, A. S. M. (1994) · New Phytologist · doi:10.1111/j.1469-8137.1994.tb04259.x · Cited by 671
Strategies of heavy metal uptake by three plant species growing near a metal smelter
Dahmani-Muller, H., van Oort, F., Gélie, B., & Balabane, M. (2000) · Environmental Pollution · doi:10.1016/s0269-7491(99)00262-6 · Cited by 493
Environmental fate and microbial degradation of aminopolycarboxylic acids
Bucheli‐Witschel, M., & Egli, T. W. (2001) · FEMS Microbiology Reviews · doi:10.1016/s0168-6445(00)00055-3 · Cited by 492
Brown, S. L., Chaney, R. L., Angle, J. S., & Baker, A. J. M. (1994) · Journal of Environmental Quality · doi:10.2134/jeq1994.00472425002300060004x · Cited by 448
Lead Phytoextraction from Contaminated Soil with High‐Biomass Plant Species
Shen, Z., Li, X., Wang, C., Chen, H., & Chua, H. (2002) · Journal of Environmental Quality · doi:10.2134/jeq2002.1893 · Cited by 359
EDTA and HEDTA effects on Cd, Cr, and Ni uptake by Helianthus annuus
Chen, H., & Cutright, T. (2001) · Chemosphere · doi:10.1016/s0045-6535(01)00031-5 · Cited by 315
Plant uptake of inorganic waste constituents
Chaney, R. L. (1983) · Cited by 257
Cited by
Role of organic amendments on enhanced bioremediation of heavy metal (loid) contaminated soils
Park, J. H., Lamb, D., Paneerselvam, P., Choppala, G., Bolan, N., & Chung, J.-W. (2011) · Journal of Hazardous Materials · doi:10.1016/j.jhazmat.2010.09.082 · Cited by 936
Evangelou, M. W. H., Ebel, M., & Schaeffer, A. (2007) · Chemosphere · doi:10.1016/j.chemosphere.2007.01.062 · Cited by 632
do Nascimento, C. W. A., Amarasiriwardena, D., & Xing, B. (2006) · Environmental Pollution · doi:10.1016/j.envpol.2005.06.017 · Cited by 280
RETRACTED: Mobilization of contaminants: Potential for soil remediation and unintended consequences
Kumar, M., Bolan, N., Jasemizad, T., Padhye, L. P., Sridharan, S., Singh, L., Bolan, S., O'Connor, J., Zhao, H., Shaheen, S. M., et al. (2022) · Science of The Total Environment · doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.156373 · Cited by 104
RetractedDang, P., & Li, C. (2022) · International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology · doi:10.1007/s13762-021-03807-z · Cited by 36
Metadata
- Authors
- Meers, E., Ruttens, A., Hopgood, M. J., Samson, D., & Tack, F. M. G.
- Venue
- Chemosphere
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2005-02
- Volume
- 58
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 1011-1022
- ISSN
- 0045-6535 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2036133324
- Cited by
- 438
- References
- 27
- FWCI
- 16.88
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Comparison of EDTA and EDDS as potential soil amendments for enhanced phytoextraction of heavy metals. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2004.09.047
- The paper
- Meers, E., Ruttens, A., Hopgood, M. J., Samson, D., & Tack, F. M. G. (2005). Comparison of EDTA and EDDS as potential soil amendments for enhanced phytoextraction of heavy metals. Chemosphere. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2004.09.047
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
